The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India

, Volume 67, Issue 6, pp 428–431 | Cite as

Geriatric Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Going the Extra Mile

Original Article



To assess the quality of life in geriatric patients after reconstructive and obliterative vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).


Prospective observational study was conducted between January 2009 and December 2014 at the department of Urogynaecology, Government Kasturbha Gandhi Hospital. A total of 424 women (between the age group of 60 and 94 years) with advanced pelvic organ prolapse underwent vaginal hysterectomy along with vaginal apical suspension procedures which were McCalls culdoplasty (35.02%), sacrospinous ligament suspension (8.3%), high uterosacral ligament suspension (26.2%), iliococcygeus fixation (4.6%) for stage 3–4 POP. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy (3.2%) was done for stage 3–4 vaginal vault prolapse. Patients with medical comorbidities underwent Leeforts partial colpocleisis (8.1%) and total colpocleisis (2%) for stage 3 and 4 POP. Site-specific repair (12.5%) was done for stage 3/4 cystocele and rectocele. The main outcomes measured were subjective cure (no prolapse), subjective improvements in pelvic floor symptoms as per the pelvic floor impact questionnaire, and objective cure (no prolapse of vaginal segment on maximum straining).


Mean age of the patient was 64.29 years. The major complication rates were less than 1%. 85% were examined at 3 and 12 months. The subjective cure rate at 12 months is 92% and the objective cure rate is 94.5%.


The geriatric patients who underwent either reconstructive or obliterative procedures were relieved of their preoperative symptoms and their quality of life had greatly improved.


Geriatric pelvic organ prolapse Apical suspension procedures Colpocleisis Quality of life 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Seethalakshmi Krishnan declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This prospective study was approved by Ethical Committee of Government Kasturbha Gandhi Hospital, Madras Medical College, Chennai.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008(5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Sung VW, Weitzen S. Effect of patient age on increasing morbidity and mortality following urogynaecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1411–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen GD, Ng SC. Functional and structural changes of pelvic floor in ageing women. Incont Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;1(3):81–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barber MD, Amundsen CL. Quality of life after surgery for genital prolapse in elderly women. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18:799–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erekson EA, Ratner ES. Gynaecologic surgery in the geriatric patient. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(6):1262.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stepp KJ, Mathew D. Incidence of perioperative complications of urogynecologic surgery in elderly women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1630–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Betscart C, Rizk DEE. Pelvic floor surgery and the need for geriatric urogynaecology. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:297–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Gynaec OncologyGovernment Aringar Anna Memorial Cancer Hospital and Regional Cancer CentreKanchipuramIndia

Personalised recommendations