Skip to main content

Tale of the Tails, the Missing Postpartum IUCD Strings

Abstract

Introduction

Using an intrauterine device (IUD) is many times safer than pregnancy and more effective in preventing pregnancy than oral contraceptives, condoms, spermicidal, any barrier method, or natural family planning. Benefits of healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy are many. Postpartum contraception is becoming popular after introduction of PPIUCD services.

Objective

To study the incidence, management, clinical outcome of missing strings cases in post-placental and intra-cesarean IUCD.

Materials and Methods

This study was a retrospective observational study, carried out in the district of Balangir, Odisha, India. Status of women who had post-placental and intra-cesarean IUCD insertion in various institutions between January 2010 and December 2012 having follow-up as per the protocol was taken for the study. All the complications were recorded and studied. Incidence, clinical outcome, and management of missing strings were analyzed.

Results

Records of 1343 clients were studied. Six hundred and seventeen cases had failed to report for follow-up as per the study design. Seven hundred and twenty-six cases had follow-up as per the protocol. Of them, 36 had expulsion, and rest 690 cases were taken for the study. There were 209 missing strings at 3 months. At the end of the study, there was spontaneous descend in 138 cases. More than 50 % cases were asymptomatic. Ultrasonography was the method of diagnosis, and simple sounding of the uterus alone could also establish IUD in uterine cavity. Removal rate was higher in missing strings group, Continuation rate is higher in String visible group.

Conclusion

Post-placental intra-cesarean Copper T 380A insertion is a safe and effective method of reversible contraception; missing string is emerging as a potential distracter of its use. It is important that every user must be followed up and the providers must be competent in managing complication. Better after care in form of effective follow-up and complication management is needed to maintain popularity. Introduction of compensation scheme will also help improving the acceptance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Norton M, Shelton JD. Stillbirth and healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy. Lancet. 2011;378(9794):876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marchi NM, Castro S, Hidalgo MM, et al. Management of missing strings in users of intrauterine contraceptives. Contraception. 2012;86(4):354–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Counseling for postpartum family planning and postpartum IUCD. New Delhi: family planning division. Government of India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singal S, Bharti R, Dewan R, et al. Clinical outcome of postplacental copper t 380a insertion in women delivering by caesarean section. J Clin Diagn Res. [serial online] 2014;8(9):OC04.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pfitzer A, MacKenzie D, Blanchard H, et al. A facility birth can be the time to start family planning: postpartum intrauterine device experiences from six countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;130(S2):S54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yadav V, Balasubramaniam S, Das S, et al. Comparison of outcomes at 6 weeks following postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertions by doctors and nurses in India: a case-control study. Contraception. 2016;93(4):347–55 (Epub 2015 Dec 29).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and expulsion of post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD). J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64(5):337–43. doi:10.1007/s13224-014-0550-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. López-Farfan JA, Hernandez-Gonzalez A, Vélez-Machorro IJ, Vázquez-Estrada LA. A comparative, randomized study of levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) vs copper T 380A intrauterine device applied during cesarean section. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2:151–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katheit G, Agarwal J. Evaluation of post-placental intrauterine device (PPIUCD) in terms of awareness, acceptance, and expulsion in a tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(4):539–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahuja R, Rahtore A. Continuation rates of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) insertion: randomised trial of post placental versus immediate postpartum insertion. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(s2):9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhutta SZ, Butt IJ, Bano K. Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device at caesarean section. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2011;21(9):527–30.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstuck ND, Wildemeersch D. Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion. Int J Women’s Health. 2014;6(1):735–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujnanendra Mishra.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

Author certify that he has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted work.

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Dr. Sujnanendra Mishra MD (OBGYN), is senior consultant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, S. Tale of the Tails, the Missing Postpartum IUCD Strings. J Obstet Gynecol India 67, 202–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0940-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0940-9

Keywords

  • PPIUCD
  • Missing string
  • Expulsion
  • Management of missing thread
  • IUD retriever Hook
  • Alligator forceps