References
Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:415–29.
Salim R, Jurkovic D. Assessing congenital uterine anomalies: the role of three-dimensional ultrasonography. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18:29–36.
American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:944–55.
Ludwin A, Pityński K, Ludwin I, et al. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(1):90–9. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.011.
Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, et al., editors. Uterine microstructure in Gray’s anatomy. 37th ed. Harlow: Longman Group UK; 1989. p. 1442–3.
Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Leveno KJ, et al., editors. The puerperium in Williams obstetrics. 19th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall Int. Inc.; 1993. p. 459.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Mete Isikoglu is Specialist of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Practitioner and Bachelor in Endoscopy at GELECEK The Center For Human Reproduction.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Isikoglu, M. Arcuate Uterus: Does It Really Cause Pregnancy Loss?. J Obstet Gynecol India 66, 6–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0847-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0847-5