Abstract
Objective
To investigate the role of “mifepristone” for induction of labor (IOL) in pregnant women with prior cesarean section (CS).
Methods
In this retrospective study, all pregnant women with prior CS who received oral mifepristone (400 mg) for IOL (as per clear obstetric indications) [group 1] were compared with pregnant women with prior CS who had spontaneous onset of labor (SOL) [group 2], with respect to incidence of vaginal delivery, CS, duration of labor, and various maternal and fetal outcomes.
Results
During the study period, 72 women received mifepristone (group 1) for IOL and 346 had SOL (group 2). In group 1 after mifepristone administration, 40 (55.6 %) women had labor onset, and 24 (33.3 %) women had cervical ripening (Bishop Score ≥ 8) within 48 h. There were no statistically significant differences with respect to duration of labor (p value: 0.681), mode of delivery (i.e., normal delivery or CS—p value: 0.076 or 0.120, respectively), or maternal (blood loss or scar dehiscence/rupture uterus), or fetal outcomes (NICU admission) compared to women with previous CS with SOL (group 2). However, the need of oxytocin (p value 0.020) and dose of oxytocin requirement (p value 0.008) were more statistically significant in group 1.
Conclusion
Mifepristone may be considered as an agent for IOL in women with prior CS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arulkumaran S. Caesarean section rates are increasing worldwide. Preface. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):151–2. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.01.001.
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, et al. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:1–13.
Niino Y. The increasing cesarean rate globally and what we can do about it. Biosci Trends. 2011;5(4):139–50. doi:10.5582/bst.2011.v5.4.139.
ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(4):450–63. doi:10.5582/bst.2011.v5.4.139.
Jozwiak M, Dodd JM. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009792.
Dodd J, Crowther C. Induction of labour for women with a previous Caesarean birth: a systematic review of the literature. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44(5):392–5.
Hapangama D, Neilson JP. Mifepristone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002865.
McGill J, Shetty A. Mifepristone and misoprostol in the induction of labor at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;96(2):80–4.
Stenlund PM, Ekman G, Aedo AR et al. Induction of labor with mifepristone–a randomized, double-blind study versus placebo. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(9):793–8.
Li L, Gao W, Chen S. Labour induction in women at term with mifepristone and misoprostol. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1996;31(11):681–4.
Lelaidier C, Baton C, Benifla JL et al. Mifepristone for labour induction after previous caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(6):501–3.
Zhang N, Hu Y. Labor induction in women at term with mifepristone and it’s safety. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1999;34(12):751–3.
Su H, Li E, Weng L. Mifepristone for induction of labor. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1996;31(11):676–80.
Edwards MS. Mifepristone: cervical ripening and induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;39(2):469–73.
Lelaidier C, Benifla JL, Fernandez H et al. [The value of RU-486 (mifepristone) in medical indications of the induction of labor at term. Results of a double-blind randomized prospective study (RU-486 versus placebo)]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1993;22(1):91–100.
Berkane N, Verstraete L, Uzan S et al. Use of mifepristone to ripen the cervix and induce labor in term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(1):114–20.
Elliott CL, Brennand JE, Calder AA. The effects of mifepristone on cervical ripening and labor induction in primigravidae. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(5):804–9.
Wing DA, Fassett MJ, Mishell DR. Mifepristone for preinduction cervical ripening beyond 41 weeks’ gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(4):543–8.
Giacalone PL, Targosz V, Laffargue F et al. Cervical ripening with mifepristone before labor induction: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(4 Pt 1):487–92.
Berkane N, Verstraete L, Uzan S et al. Use of mifepristone to ripen the cervix and induce labor in term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(1):114–20.
Brogden RN, Goa KL, Faulds D. Mifepristone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential. Drugs. 1993;45:384–409.
Chwalisz K, Garfield RE. New molecular challenges in the induction on cervical ripening. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:245–52.
Garfield RE, Blennerhassett MG, Miller SM. Control of myometrial contractility: role and regulation of gap junctions. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol. 1988;10:436–90.
Cheng L, Kelly RW, Thong KJ et al. The effects of mifepristone (RU486) on prostaglandin dehydrogenase in decidual and chorionic tissue in early pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:705–9.
Cheng L, Kelly RW, Thong KJ et al. The effect of mifepristone (RU486) on the immunohistochemical distribution of prostaglandin E and its metabolite in decidual and chorionic tissue in early pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:873–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest with any individual or organization.
Ethical Statement
Compliance with ethical requirements and Conflict of interest Ethical clearance has been taken from ethical committee of Dr. RPGMC Kangra at Tanda (HFW-H-DRPGMC/Ethics/2014) keeping in view the ICMR guidelines (1994) and Helinski declaration (modified 2000). Written informed consent was taken from all the women. Identity of every women is kept as secret. All the women were adequately informed of the aims, methods, and any discomfort it may entail to her and the remedies thereof. Every precaution was taken to respect the privacy of the patient, the confidentiality of the patient’s information, and to minimize the impact of the study on her physical and mental integrity and her personality. The patient was given the right to abstain from the study or to withdraw consent to participate at any time of study without reappraisal.
Additional information
Dr. Chanderdeep Sharma is an Assistant Professor, Dr. Anjali Soni is an Associate Professor, Dr. Pawan K. Soni is an Assistant Professor (Radio-diagnosis), Dr. Suresh Verma is a Professor and the Head, Dr. Ashok Verma is an Associate Professor, Dr. Amit Gupta is an Associate Professor at the Department of OBG, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College (Dr. RPGMC) Kangra at Tanda (HP), Kangra, HP, India.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, C., Soni, A., Soni, P.K. et al. A Retrospective Case–Control Study Evaluating the Role of Mifepristone for Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section. J Obstet Gynecol India 66 (Suppl 1), 30–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0760-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0760-3