A Comparison of the “Hands-Off” and “Hands-On” Methods to Reduce Perineal Lacerations: A Randomised Clinical Trial
- 942 Downloads
The objective of the current study was to compare the “Hands-off” and “Hands-on” methods to reduce perineal lacerations.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two techniques for perineum protection during spontaneous delivery. Study participants included 600 nulliparous expectant mothers, who were divided equally between the “hands off” and “hands on” groups (n_300 per group).
A total of 147 (49 %) women in the “Hands-on” and 143 women (47.7 %) in the “Hand -off” groups encountered perineal trauma (p = 0.74). In the “Hands-on” group, 8 women (2.7 %) experienced a third degree trauma compared with (0.3 %) that in the “Hands-off” method (p = 0.1).
Episiotomy was performed on 38 women (12.7 %) from the “Hands-on” and 17 (5.7 %) women from the “Hands-off” (p = 0.003) groups. In addition, 28 women (9.3 %) from the “Hands-on” group and 47 women (15.7 %) from the “Hands-off” group experienced periurethral tears (p = 0.01) that did not need mending.
Application of the “Hands-off” method for vaginal delivery has a positive effect on the mother’s health because of the reduction of Episiotomy and third degree tearing. Therefore, we conclude that the “Hands-off” method offers a safer alternative for perineal control during labor.
KeywordsHands-on Hand off Perineal lacerations
We thank all the women and midwives who took part in this study and helped us; we would also like to express our gratitude to the head of Imam Ali hospital and the authority of the delivery department. This study was funded by Mazandaran university of medical sciences, Sari, Iran
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest
- 2.Sohrabi M, Ivan BR, SHirinkam R, et al. A comparison of” Hands Off versus” Hands On”(Ritgen) techniques on perineal trauma during birth in nulliparous women. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci(JAUMS). 2009.Google Scholar
- 6.Jahdi F, Kashanian M, Ashghali Farahani M, et al. The effect of hands-off and hands-on methods on perineal status. J Sabzevar Sch Med Sci. 2010;16(4):189–195.Google Scholar
- 7.Mathai MSH, Guidotti RJ. World Health Organization managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: a guide for midwive and doctors recommendations for preventing and treating perineal injury at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;107(2):361–6.Google Scholar
- 8.Heit M, Mudd K, Culligan P. Prevention of childbirth injuries to the pelvic floor. Curr Women’s Health Rep. 2001;1:72–80.Google Scholar
- 9.de Souza Caroci da Costa A, Gonzalez Riesco ML. A comparison of “Hands Off” versus “Hands On” techniques for decreasing perineal lacerations during birth. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2006;51(2):106–111.Google Scholar
- 13.Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Lukasse M, et al. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub2.
- 15.Greve T. Disturbing” New” trends in tear prevention threaten midwives’ autonomy. Midwifery Today IntMidwife. 2009;35(92):56.Google Scholar