Placental Laterality as a Predictor for Development of Preeclampsia

  • Tania Kakkar
  • Virender Singh
  • Rajni Razdan
  • Sanjeev K. Digra
  • Amita Gupta
  • Manisha Kakkar
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To find whether placental laterality as determined by ultrasound can be used as predictor for the development of preeclampsia.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Govt. Medical College, Jammu from 2006 to 2007. 150 pregnant women attending antenatal clinic both OPD and IPD at 18–24 weeks of gestation without any high risk factor were subjected to ultrasound examination, and placental location was determined. These cases were followed for the development of signs and symptoms of preeclampsia.

Result

Out of the total 150 women, 84 (56 %) had laterally located placenta and of them, 56 (66.6 %) developed preeclampsia, while the remaining 66 (44 %) had centrally located placenta and of them, 24 (36.3 %) developed preeclampsia. So, the overall risk of developing preeclampsia with laterally located placenta was 5.09 (odds ratio) and 95 % confidence interval (2.40–10.88). The difference was found to be statistically significant, p value (0.00002) by χ2 test.

Conclusion

From the above study, we concluded that females with laterally located placenta determined by USG at 18–24 weeks of gestation have five times greater risk of developing preeclampsia.

Keywords

Placental laterality Preeclampsia Central placenta 

References

  1. 1.
    Walker JJ. Current thoughts on the pathophysiology of preeclampsia/eclampsia. In: Studd J, editor. Progress in obstetrics and gynecology. Edinburgh: Livingstone-Churchill; 1998. p. 177–88.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Williams obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005. p. 761–808.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fleischer A, Schulman H, Farmakides G, et al. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in pregnant women with hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;154:806–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schulman H, Winter D, Farmakides G, et al. Pregnancy surveillance with Doppler velocimetry of uterine and umbilical arteries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:192–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Campbell S, Bewbey S, Cohen-overbeek T. Investigation of the uteroplacental circulation by Doppler ultrasound. Semin Perinatol. 1987;11:362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kofinas AD, Penry M, Swain M, et al. Effect of placental laterality on uterine artery resistance and development of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pai Muralidhar V, Pillia J. Placental laterality by ultrasound—a simple yet reliable predictive test for preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2005;55:431–3.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalanithi LE, Illuzzi JL, Nossov VB, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction and placental location. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26:1481–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania Kakkar
    • 1
    • 3
  • Virender Singh
    • 2
  • Rajni Razdan
    • 1
  • Sanjeev K. Digra
    • 2
  • Amita Gupta
    • 1
  • Manisha Kakkar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics & GynaecologySMGS Hospital, Government Medical College, ShalamarJammuIndia
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsSMGS Hospital, Government Medical College, ShalamarJammuIndia
  3. 3.JammuIndia

Personalised recommendations