Contraceptive Methods: Needs, Options and Utilization



Background-Contraception is the intentional prevention of conception through the use of various devices, sexual practices, chemicals, drugs or surgical procedures. An effective contraception allows a physical relationship without fear of an unwanted pregnancy and ensures freedom to have children when desired. The aim is to achieve contraception in maximum comfort and privacy, with minimum cost and side effects. Some methods, like male and female condoms, also provide twin advantage of protection from sexually transmitted diseases. The burden of unsafe abortion lies primarily in developing countries. Here, contraceptive prevalence is measured among currently married women of reproductive age, and levels have not yet reached those that exist in developed countries.


In countries like India, there is a dire need for contraceptive methods to be more women friendly, accessible and provide adequate privacy. Providers also need to be sensitive to special needs of adolescents as they are at a critically vulnerable segment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. 1.

    The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). Sharing responsibility: women, society and abortion worldwide. New York: AGI; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Maternal mortality in 2005; Estimates Developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank, WHO, Geneva 2007.

  3. 3.

    Lule E, Singh S, Chowdhury SA. Fertility regulation behavior and their costs: contraception and unintended pregnancies in Africa and Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Washington: World Bank; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chhabra R, Nuna C. Abortion in India: an overview. New Delhi: Veerendra printers, Ford Foundation; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Washington AE, Cates W, Wasserheit J. Preventing pelvic inflammatory disease. JAMA. 1991;266(4):2574–80.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Blanc AK, Tsui AO, Croft TN, et al. Patterns and trends in adolescents’ contraceptive use and discontinuation in developing countries and comparisons with adult women. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;35(2):63–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dehne KL, Riedner G. Sexually transmitted infections among adolescents: the need for adequate health services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cowan FM, Mindel A. Sexually transmitted diseases in children: adolescents. Genitourin Med. 1993;69(2):141–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pilot P and Islam MQ. Sexually transmitted diseases in the 1990s: global epidemiology and challenges for control. Sex Transm Dis. 1994; 21(supp 2): S7–S13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ramasubban R. Women’s vulnerability: recent evidence on sexually transmitted infections. In: Ramasubban R, Jejeebhoy SJ, editors. Women’s Reproductive Health in India. Jaipur: Rawat Publications; 2000. p. 280–330.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    IIPS & ORG Macro. National family health survey-2: India. 1998–99. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2000.

  12. 12.

    Cheng CY, Mruk DD. New frontiers in nonhormonal male contraception. Contraception. 2010;82(5):476–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Seiber EE, Bertrand JT, Sullivan TM. Changes in contraceptive method mix in developing countries. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007;33(3):117–23.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jayaraman A, Mishra V Arnold F. The relationship of family size and composition to fertility desires, contraceptive adoption and method choice in South Asia. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;35(1):29–38.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Olson L, Rollins J. Psychological barriers to contraceptive use among adolescent women. In: Stuart I, Wells C, editors. Pregnancy in adolescence: needs, problems, and management. New York: Van Nostrand; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gandotra MM, Das NP. Factors influencing choice of a contraceptive and the reason for it’s discontinuation. In: Khan ME, Cernada G, editors. Spacing as an alternative strategy: India’s family welfare programme. New Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation; 1996. p. 94–114.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nichter M, Nichter M. Modern methods of fertility regulation: when and for whom are they appropriate? In: Nichter M, editor. Anthropology and international health: South Asian case studies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1989. p. 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kapur P. A study of changes in the sexual behaviour of call girls and their clients in India. Paper presented at the workshop on Sexual Aspects of AIDS/STD Prevention in India. Mumbai : Tata Institute of Social Sciences; 1993.

  19. 19.

    Nag M. Sexual behaviour and AIDS in India. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Joshi C. AIDS awareness: transmitting embarrassment. New Delhi: India Today; 1994. p. 114–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gopalakrishnan K. Promoting condoms. Seminar. 1992;396:34–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jejeebhoy SJ, Santhya KG, Verma RK, et al. Setting the stage. In: Jejeebhoy SJ, editor. Looking back looking forward: a profile of sexual and reproductive health in India. New Delhi: Population Council; 2004. p. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Govinda P, Dahal SS, Padmadas S, et al. Fertility-limiting behaviour and contraceptive choice among men in Nepal. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008;34(1):6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fisher HE. Lust, attraction and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Hum Nat. 1988;9:23–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Heise L, Ellsberg M, Gottemoeller M. Ending violence against women. Population reports series L, No. 11. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Population Information Program; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Elias CJ and Heise L. The development of microbicides: A new method of HIV prevention for women. Population council (programme division) Working Paper No. 6. New York: Population Council; 1993.

  27. 27.

    Barge S, Ramchander L. Provider and clients interactions in primary health care: a case study from Madhya Pradesh. In: Koening MA, Khan ME, editors. Improving quality of care in India’s family welfare programme: the challenge ahead. New York: Population Council; 1999. p. 92–116.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Khan ME, Patel BC, Chandrasekhar R. Study of MTP acceptors and their subsequent contraceptive use. J Fam Welf. 1993;36(3):70–85.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Khan ME, Gupta RB, Bella CP. The quality of coverage of family planning services in Uttar Pradesh: Client perspectives. In: Michael AK, Khan ME, editors. Improving quality of care in India’s family welfare programme: The challenge ahead. New York: The Population Council; 1999. p. 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumathi Muralidhar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, R., Muralidhar, S. Contraceptive Methods: Needs, Options and Utilization. J Obstet Gynecol India 61, 626–634 (2011).

Download citation


  • Contraception
  • Condoms
  • Vasectomy
  • Tubectomy
  • STDs