Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Restricted use of episiotomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the outcome of restricted versus routine use of episiotomy in a tertiary care center.

Method

A prospective observational study was conducted for singleton normal vaginal term deliveries. Deliveries managed with routine use of episiotomy formed the ‘Control Group’, while those managed with restricted use of episiotomy formed the ‘Study Group’. Data so obtained was analyzed.

Results

Total number of deliveries analyzed was 458 (‘Control Group’: n=210, ‘Study Group’: n=248). Restricted use of episiotomy led to 64% (n=159) women delivering without any perineal laceration, in ‘Study Group’. This translated into 41% (n=38) reduction in the number of perineal lacerations in primipara, and 23% (n=36) in multipara, compared to the ‘Control Group’. Only 2% of primipara in ‘Study Group’ had severe third degree perineal tears.

Conclusion

Restricted use of episiotomy resulted in considerable reduction in maternal morbidity due to perineal lacerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Low LK, Seng JS, Murtland TL, et al, Clinician — specific episiotomy rates: impact on perineal outcomes. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000;45:87–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, et al. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:2141–2148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Episiotomy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 71. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:957–962.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, et al. The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:669–673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatia JC and Cleland J. Determinants of maternal care in a region of South India, Health Transition Review 5, 1995, 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C. Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191: 1199–1204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, et al. Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:881–890.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Zondervan KT, van Rijssel EJ, Verkerk PH. Episiotomies and the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101: 1064–1067.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajiv Kumar Saxena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saxena, R.K., Sandhu, G.S., Babu, K.M. et al. Restricted use of episiotomy. J Obstet Gynecol India 60, 408–412 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-010-0067-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-010-0067-3

Key words

Navigation