A Philosophically Motivated View on AI and Robotics

Interview with Aaron Sloman, Honorary Professor of Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/meta-morphogenesis.html.

  2. 2.

    Now available at http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/mcchay69.html.

  3. 3.

    Online at https://www.ijcai.org/proceedings/1971, pp 270–278.

  4. 4.

    Discussed at length in The Computer Revolution in Philosophy: Philosophy, science and models of mindhttp://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/crp/.

  5. 5.

    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/sloman-clowestribute.html.

  6. 6.

    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/.

  7. 7.

    More details available here http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/meta-configured-genome.html.

  8. 8.

    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/trisect.html.

  9. 9.

    Many examples are discussed in this paper and papers it references: http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/impossible.html.

  10. 10.

    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/architecture-based-motivation.html.

  11. 11.

    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/compositionality.html is an incomplete attempt to develop further aspects of this idea.

  12. 12.

    Many years ago I wrote to him suggesting that what he called “Cartesian Linguistics” should be called Kantian linguistics ... but to no avail.

  13. 13.

    Please note: these ideas are still under development—corrections and suggestions welcome.

  14. 14.

    Giving the above sentence to google-translate and asking it to translate into a few other languages and back to English, produces evidence of incomprehension that seems to vary between target languages. The Winograd Schema challenge is closely related to this point: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winograd_Schema_Challenge.

  15. 15.

    Which included the Alan Turing Centenary Conference, Manchester UK, June 22–25, 2012.

  16. 16.

    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/meta-morphogenesis.html.

  17. 17.

    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/construction-kits.html.

  18. 18.

    http://www.dam.brown.edu/people/mumford/blog/2016/grammar.html.

  19. 19.

    This possibility was anticipated in a short story “The machine stops” by the novelist E.M.Forster in 1909, http://archive.ncsa.illinois.edu/prajlich/forster.html.

  20. 20.

    Try giving the sentence “I like meat with gravy whereas I prefer fish with sauce” to a translation program, and then translate the result back to English.

  21. 21.

    See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neusis_construction and http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/trisect.html.

References

  1. 1.

    Ball P (2015) Forging patterns and making waves from biology to geology: a commentary on Turing (1952) ‘The chemical basis of morphogenesis. R Soc Philos Trans B Interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ed54_95kP4

  2. 2.

    Beck SR, Robinson EJ, Carroll DJ, Apperly IA (2006) Children’s thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities. Child Dev 77(2):413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chappell J, Sloman A (2007) Natural and artificial meta-configured altricial information-processing systems. Int J Unconvent Comput 3(3):211–239

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chou S, Gao X, Zhang J (1994) Machine proofs in geometry: automated production of readable proofs for geometry theorems. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Clowes MB (1971) On seeing things. Artif Intell 2(1):79–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Clowes MB (1973) Man the creative machine: a perspective from artificial intelligence research. In: Benthall J (ed) The limits of human nature. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cooper SB, van Leeuwen J (eds) (2013) Alan turing—his work and impact. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  8. 8.

    Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Grant SGN (2018) Synapse molecular complexity and the plasticity behaviour problem. Brain Neurosci Adv 2:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hempel CG (1945) Geometry and Empirical Science. In: Feigl H, Sellars W (eds) American mathematical monthly, p 52, Repr in Readings in Philosophical Analysis, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1949

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kaneff S (ed) (1970) Picture language machines. Academic Press, New York

  12. 12.

    Kant I (1781) Critique of pure reason. Macmillan, London (Translated (1929) by Norman Kemp Smith)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Karmiloff-Smith A (1990) Constraints on representational change: evidence from children’s drawing. Cognition 34:57–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Karmiloff-Smith A (1992) Beyond modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lakatos I (1976) Proofs and refutations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McCarthy J, Hayes PJ (1969) Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Meltzer B, Michie D (eds) Machine intelligence 4. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 463–502 (reprinted in McC90)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Minsky ML (1963) Steps toward artificial intelligence. In: Feigenbaum EA, Feldman J (eds) Computers and thought. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 406–450

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Newport T (2015) Brains and computers: amino acids versus transistors. Kindle, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nicholas JM (ed) (1977) Images, perception, and Knowledge. Reidel, Dordrecht-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Popper KR (1972) Objective knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Schrödinger E (1944) What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sloman A (1962) Knowing and Understanding: Relations between meaning and truth, meaning and necessary truth, meaning and synthetic necessary truth (DPhil Thesis). PhD thesis, Oxford University

  23. 23.

    Sloman A (1965) ‘Necessary’, ‘A Priori’ and ‘Analytic’. Analysis 26(1):12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sloman A (1971) Interactions between philosophy and artificial intelligence: the role of intuition and non-logical reasoning in intelligence. Artif Intell 2(3):209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sloman A, Owen D, Hinton G, O’Gorman F (1978) Representation and Control in Vision. In: Sleeman D (eds) Proc. AISB/GI Conference, pp 309–315, Hamburg, Germany

  26. 26.

    Thompson D’Arcy W (1917) On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Revised Edition 1948)

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Trettenbrein PC (2016) The demise of the synapse as the locus of memory: a looming paradigm shift? Front Syst Neurosci 10:88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Turing AM (1952) The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 237(641):37–72

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ugur E (2010) A developmental framework for learning affordances. PhD thesis, the graduate school of natural and applied sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  30. 30.

    von Neumann J (2012) The computer and the brain (silliman memorial lectures). Yale University Press, New Haven (3rd Edition, with Foreword by Ray Kurzweill. Originally published 1958.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Kunze.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunze, L., Sloman, A. A Philosophically Motivated View on AI and Robotics. Künstl Intell 33, 429–445 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-019-00621-1

Download citation