KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 71–75 | Cite as

Companion-Technology for Cognitive Technical Systems

Research Project

Abstract

We introduce the Transregional Collaborative Research Centre “Companion-Technology for Cognitive Technical Systems”—a cross-disciplinary endeavor towards the development of an enabling technology for Companion-systems. These systems completely adjust their functionality and service to the individual user. They comply with his or her capabilities, preferences, requirements, and current needs and adapt to the individual’s emotional state and ambient conditions. Companion-like behavior of technical systems is achieved through the investigation and implementation of cognitive abilities and their well-orchestrated interplay.

Keywords

Cognitive systems Companion-characteristics Planning Reasoning Decision making Multimodal interaction Disposition recognition 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Behnke G, Ponomaryov D, Schiller M, Bercher P, Nothdurft F, Glimm B, Biundo S (2015) Coherence across components in cognitive systems – one ontology to rule them all. In: Proc. of the 25th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), AAAI Press, pp 1442–1449Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bercher P, Biundo S, Geier T, Hoernle T, Nothdurft F, Richter F, Schattenberg B (2014) Plan, repair, execute, explain—how planning helps to assemble your home theater. In: Proc. of the 24th Int. Conf. on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), AAAI Press, pp 386–394Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biundo S, Bercher P, Geier T, Müller F, Schattenberg B (2011) Advanced user assistance based on AI planning. Cogn Syst Res 12(3–4):219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biundo S, Wendemuth A (2010) Von kognitiven technischen Systemen zu Companion-Systemen. Künstliche Intelligenz 24(4):335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biundo S, Wendemuth A (2016) Companion Technology—A Paradigm Shift in Human-Technology Interaction. Springer, ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frommer J, Michaelis B, Rösner D, Wendemuth A, Friesen R, Haase M, Kunze M, Andrich R, Lange J, Panning A, Siegert I (2012) Towards emotion and affect detection in the multimodal last minute corpus. In: Proc. of the Eight Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), pp 3064–3069Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glodek M, Geier T, Biundo S, Palm G (2014) A layered architecture for probabilistic complex pattern recognition to detect user preferences. Biol Inspir Cogn Archit 9:46–56Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gugenheimer J, Knierim P, Seifert J, Rukzio E (2014) Ubibeam: An interactive projector-camera system for domestic deployment. In: Proc. of the 9th ACM Int. Conf. on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS ’14, ACM, pp 305–310Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Handrich S, Al-Hamadi A, Ahmed OR (2012) Improving of gesture recognition using multi-hypotheses object association. In: Proc. of the 5th Int. Image and Signal Processing Conf. (ICISP), Springer, pp. 298–306Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Honold F, Schüssel F, Weber M (2014) The automated interplay of multimodal fission and fusion in adaptive HCI. In: Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Environments (IE), IEEE, pp 170–177Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ilango A, Shumake J, Wetzel W, Scheich H, Ohl FW (2011) Effects of ventral tegmental area stimulation on the acquisition and long-term retention of active avoidance learning. Behav Brain Res 225(2):515–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kächele M, Rukavina S, Palm G, Schwenker F, Schels M (2015) Paradigms for the construction and annotation of emotional corpora for real-world human-computer-interaction. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods (ICPRAM), SciTePress, pp 367–373Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kohrs C, Angenstein N, Scheich H, Brechmann A (2010) The temporal contingency of feedback: effects on brain activity. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Aging and CognitionGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nothdurft F, Heinroth T, Minker W (2013) The impact of explanation dialogues on human-computer trust. In: Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Contexts of Use, Springer, pp 59–67Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rösner D, Friesen R, Otto M, Lange J, Haase M, Frommer J (2011) Intentionality in interacting with companion systems—an empirical approach. In: Human-Computer Interaction. Towards Mobile and Intelligent Interaction Environments, LNCS, Springer, 6763: 593–602Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schattenberg, B, Schulz AL, Brechmann A, Ohl FW, Biundo S (2012) Planning models for two-way avoidance and reversal learning. In: Proc. of the 7th Vienna Int. Conf. on Mathematical Modelling (MATHMOD)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwenker F, Scherer S, Morency, L (2015) Multimodal Pattern Recognition of Social Signals in Human-Computer-Interaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8869. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Siegert I, Ohnemus K (2015) A new dataset of telephone-based human-human call-center interaction with emotional evaluation. In: Proc. of the First International Symposium on Companion Technology (ISCT)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walter S, Scherer S, Schels M, Glodek M, Hrabal D, Schmidt M, Böck R, Limbrecht K, Traue HC, Schwenker F (2011) Multimodal emotion classification in naturalistic user behavior. In: Proc. of the 14th Int. Conf. on Human Computer Interaction (HCI), Springer, pp 603–611Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wendemuth A, Biundo S (2012) A companion technology for cognitive technical systems. In: Cognitive Behavioural Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp 89–103Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Artificial IntelligenceUlm UniversityUlmGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Information and Communication EngineeringOtto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
  3. 3.Center for Behavioral Brain SciencesMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations