Abstract
Space and time are two of the most fundamental categories any human, animal, or other cognitive agent such as an autonomous robot has to deal with. They need to perceive their environments, make sense of their perceptions, and make interactions as embodied entities with other agents and their environment. The theoretical foundations and practical implications have been investigated from a cognitive perspective (i.e., from an information processing point of view) within the Sonderforschungsbereich/Transregio SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition (http://www.sfbtr8.spatial-cognition.de) over the past 12 years jointly by the Universities of Bremen and Freiburg. The research covered fundamental questions: what are the specific requirements of reasoning about space and time, for acting in space, and for any form of interaction including communication in spatio-temporal domains? It has been a success story in all research lines from foundational research to applications of spatial cognition in robotics, interaction and communication. The SFB/TR 8 actually shaped a new research field by extending a previous subfield of cognitive science with its own interdisciplinary techniques.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bateman JA, Hois J, Ross R, Tenbrink T (2010) A linguistic ontology of space for natural language processing. Artif Intell 174(14):1027–1071
Bhatt M, Schultz C, Freksa C (2013) The ’Space’ in spatial assistance systems: conception, formalisation, and computation. In: Tenbrink T, Wiener J, Claramunt C (eds) Representing space in cognition: behaviour, language, and formal models, Explorations in language and space. Oxford University Press, pp 171–214
Burgard W, Moors M, Stachniss C, Schneider FE (2005) Coordinated multi-robot exploration. Robot IEEE Trans 21(3):376–386
Dornhege C, Gissler M, Teschner M, Nebel B (2009) Integrating symbolic and geometric planning for mobile manipulation. In: Safety, security and rescue robotics (SSRR), 2009 Workshop on, IEEE, pp 1–6
Dylla F, Wallgrün JO (2007) Qualitative spatial reasoning with conceptual neighborhoods for agent control. J Intell Rob Syst 48(1):55–78
Fischer C, Shi H, Jian C, Schafmeister F, Menrad N, von Steinbüchel N, Schill K, Krieg-Brückner B (2010) Modelling user behaviour while driving an intelligent wheelchair. In: Fred ALN , Filipe J, Gamboa H (eds) HEALTHINF 2010: proceedings of the 3rd international conference on health informatics, Valencia, Spain, INSTICC Press, 20-23 Jan 2010, pp 330–336
Gantner Z, Westphal M, Wölfl S (2008) GQR-A fast reasoner for binary qualitative constraint calculi. In: Guesgen HW, Ligozat G, Rodriguez RV (eds) Proceedings of the AAAI’08 workshop on spatial and temporal reasoning. AAAI Press
Grisetti G, Kummerle R, Stachniss C, Frese U, Hertzberg C (2010) Hierarchical optimization on manifolds for online 2d and 3d mapping. In: Robotics and automation (ICRA), 2010 IEEE international conference on, IEEE, pp 273–278
Grisetti G, Stachniss C, Burgard W (2007) Improved techniques for grid mapping with Rao–Blackwellized particle filters. IEEE Trans Robot 23(1):34–46
Hölscher C, Tenbrink T, Wiener JM (2011) Would you follow your own route description? Ccognitive strategies in urban route planning. Cognition 121(2):228–247
Klippel A, Richter KF, Barkowsky T, Freksa C (2005) The cognitive reality of schematic maps. In: Meng L, Reichenbacher T, Zipf A (eds) Map-based mobile services: theories, methods and implementations. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 57–74
Mossakowski T, Moratz R (2012) Qualitative reasoning about relative direction of oriented points. Artif Intell 180:34–45
Ragni M, Fangmeier T, Brüssow S (2010) Deductive spatial reasoning: from neurological evidence to a cognitive model. In: Salvucci DD, Gunzelmann G (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international conference on cognitive modeling. Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, pp 193–198
Ragni M, Knauff M (2013) A theory and a computational model of spatial reasoning with preferred mental models. Psychol Rev 120(3):561–588
Renz J, Nebel B (2007) Qualitative spatial reasoning using constraint calculi. In: Aiello M, Pratt-Hartmann I, Van Benthem J (eds) Handbook of spatial logics. Springer, Netherlands, pp 161–215
Schultheis H, Barkowsky T (2011) Casimir: an architecture for mental spatial knowledge processing. Top Cogn Sci 3:778–795 Issue on Modeling Spatial Cognition
Tenbrink T (2007) Space, time, and the use of language: an investigation of relationships. Cognitive Linguistics Research, vol 36. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin
Wallgrün JO, Frommberger L, Wolter D, Dylla F, Freksa C (2007) Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning in the SparQ-toolbox. In: Barkowsky T et al (eds) Spatial Cognition V Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4387. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 39–58
Wolter D, Dylla F, Wölfl S, Wallgrün JO, Frommberger L, Nebel B, Freksa C (2008) Sailaway: spatial cognition in sea navigation. KI 22(1):28–30
Wurm K, Dornhege C, Eyerich P, Stachniss C, Nebel B, Burgard W (2010) Coordinated exploration with marsupial teams of robots using temporal symbolic planning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), IEEE, pp 5014–5019
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the SFB/TR 8 through the German Research Foundation (DFG). This work has also been partially supported by a DFG Heisenberg-Fellowship (grant no. RA 1934/3-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ragni, M., Barkowsky, T., Nebel, B. et al. Cognitive Space and Spatial Cognition: The SFB/TR 8 Spatial Cognition. Künstl Intell 30, 83–88 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-015-0404-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-015-0404-x