KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 153–159 | Cite as

Exploiting Latent Embeddings of Nominal Clinical Data for Predicting Hospital Readmission

  • Denis KrompaßEmail author
  • Cristóbal Esteban
  • Volker Tresp
  • Martin Sedlmayr
  • Thomas Ganslandt
Technical Contribution


Hospital readmissions of patients put a high burden not only on the health care system, but also on the patients since complications after discharge generally lead to additional burdens. Estimating the risk of readmission after discharge from inpatient care has been the subject of several publications in recent years. In those publications the authors mostly tried to directly infer the readmission risk (within a certain time frame) from the clinical data recorded in the medical routine such as primary diagnosis, co-morbidities, length of stay, or questionnaires. Instead of using these data directly as inputs for a prediction model, we are exploiting latent embeddings for the nominal parts of the data (e.g., diagnosis and procedure codes). These latent embeddings have been used with great success in the natural language processing domain and can be constructed in a preprocessing step. We show in our experiments, that a prediction model that exploits these latent embeddings can lead to improved readmission predictive models.


Hospital readmission Latent embeddings Latent factors Logistic regression Neural network 



The project receives funding from the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology; Grant Number 01MT14001A.


  1. 1.
    Bengio Y, Ducharme R, Vincent P, Janvin C (2003) A neural probabilistic language model. J Mach Learn Res 3:1137–1155zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Billings J, Blunt I, Stevenson A, Georghiou T, Lewis G, Bardsley M (2012) Development of a predictive model to identify inpatients at risk of readmission within 30 days of discharge (parr-30). BMJ OpenGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choudhry S, Li J, Davis D, Erdmann C, Sikka R, Sutariya B (2013) A public-private partnership develops and externally validates a 30-day hospital readmission risk prediction model. Online J Public Health Inform 5(2)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collobert R, Weston J, Bottou L, Karlen M, Kavukcuoglu K, Kuksa P (2011) Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. J Mach Learn Res 12:2493–2537zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donzé J, Aujesky D, Williams D, Schnipper JL (2013) Potentially avoidable 30-day hospital readmissions in medical patients. JAMA 173:632–638Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dormann H, Neubert A, Criegee-Rieck M, Egger T, Radespiel-Troger M, Azaz-Livshits T, Levy M, Brune K, Hahn EG (2004) Readmissions and adverse drug reactions in internal medicine: the economic impact. J Int Med 255:653–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hasan O, Meltzer DO, Shaykevich SA, Bell CM et al (2009) Hospital readmission in general medicine patients: a prediction model. J Gen Intern Med 25:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hebert C, Shivade C, Foraker R, Wasserman J, et al (2014) Diagnosis-specific readmission risk prediction using electronic health data: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Med Inform Decis Making 14Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hendricks V, Schmidt S, Vogt A, Gysan D, Latz V, Schwang I, Griebenow R, Riedel R (2014) Case management program for patients with chronic heart failure. effectiveness in terms of mortality, hospital admissions and costs. Deutsches Aerzteblatt. International 111:264–270Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang EH, Socher R, Manning CD, Ng AY (2012) Improving word representations via global context and multiple word prototypes. In: Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jack BW, Chetty VK, Anthony D, Greenwald JL et al (1999) A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial. JAMA 281:613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA New England Journal of Medicine 14:1418–1428Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lebret R, Collobert R (2014) Word embeddings through hellinger pca. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL). Association for Computational Linguistics. pp 482–490Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Naylor MD, Brooten D, Campbell R, Jacobsen BS et al (1999) A comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 281:613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    OECD (2013) Health at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Department of Health (2013) Payment by results guidance for 2013–2014. Department of Health, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ohman E, Granger CB, Harrington RA, Lee KL (2000) Risk stratification and therapeutic decision making in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 286(7):876–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robinson P Hospitals readmissions and the 30 day threshold.
  19. 19.
    Rümenapf G, Geiger S, Schneider B, Amendt K, Wilhelm N, Morbach S, Nagel N (2013) Readmissions of patients with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers after infra-popliteal bypass surgery: attacking the problem by an integrated case management model. Eur J Vasc Med 42:56–67Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smitht D, Giobbie-Hurder A, Weinberger M, Oddone EZ et al (2000) Predicting non-elective hospital readmissions: a multi site study. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1113–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15:1929–1958zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turney PD, Pantel P (2010) From frequency to meaning: vector space models of semantics. pp 141–188Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yu S, Van Esbroeck A, Farooq F, Fung G, Anand V, Krishnapuram B (2013) Predicting readmission risk with institution specific prediction models. In: ICHI, pp 415–420Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denis Krompaß
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cristóbal Esteban
    • 2
  • Volker Tresp
    • 2
  • Martin Sedlmayr
    • 3
  • Thomas Ganslandt
    • 3
  1. 1.Ludwig Maximilian UniversityMunichGermany
  2. 2.Siemens AG, Corporate TechnologyMunichGermany
  3. 3.Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations