Skip to main content
Log in

The Virtual Space Robotics Testbed: Comprehensive Means for the Development and Evaluation of Components for Robotic Exploration Missions

  • Technical Contribution
  • Published:
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designing robotic components and algorithms for exploration and science missions in space and on celestial bodies requires extensive preparation and testing. Due to the extremely high costs of spaceflight and space-capable hardware, design and evaluation iterations need to be performed on earth, using computer simulations as well as real test environments to make predictions about the robot’s performance on the real mission. A variety of ways to simulate single aspects of a robot like mechanical stress or power consumption in great detail are in active use. However, no truly holistic solution that evaluates overall system behavior across a multitude of disciplines has been developed to date. In this paper, we discuss the benefits of such a solution and present our virtual space robotics testbed, a framework that represents our work towards a holistic solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wetter M, Haves P (2008) A Modular Building Controls Virtual Test Bed for the Integration of Heterogeneos Systems. In: Proceedings of SimBuild, 3rd National Conference of IBPSA-USA Berkeley, California, USA

  2. Dougal RA, Liu S, Gao L, Blackwelder M (2002) Virtual test bed for advanced power sources. J Power Sources 110(2):285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dion F, Jun-Seok Oh, Robinson R (2011) Virtual testbed for assessing probe vehicle data in intellidrive systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 12(3):635–644. doi:10.1109/TITS.2009.2034017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Poulakis P, Joudrier L, Wailliez S, Kapellos K (2008) 3DROV: A planetary rover system design, simulation and verification tool. In Proc. 9th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS), Hollywood, USA

  5. Quigley M, Conley K, Gerkey B et al (2009): ROS: an open-source robot operating system. ICRA workshop on open source software

  6. Bardina J, Rajkumar T (2013) Intelligent launch and range operations virtual testbed (ILRO- VTB). In Proc. SPIE 5091, Enabling Technologies for Simulation Science VII, 141, doi:10.1117/12.486335

  7. Rossmann J (2012) eRobotics: The Symbiosis of Advanced Robotics and Virtual Reality Technologies. In: Proc. ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE (ASME GX1576—2012), Chicago, Illinois, USA, Vol. 2, Part B “32nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference”, pp 1395ff

  8. Rossmann J, Schluse M, Sondermann B, Emde M & Rast M (2012). Advanced mobile robot engineering with virtual testbeds. In Proc. 7th German Conference on Robotics, Munich, Germany, pp 331–336

  9. Roßmann J, Schlette C, Springer M (2012) kinematic robot control for a planetary landing mockup. In: A. Bruzzone (ed.): Proceedings of the 20th IASTED international conference on applied simulation and modelling (ASM 2012), Napoli, Italy, pp 134–141, doi:10.2316/P.2012.776-028

  10. Roßmann J, Emde M, Steil, T, Hempe N (2013) Validierte Sensorsimulation zur integrierten Entwicklung mechatronischer Systeme für zukünftige Weltraummissionen”. In: Gausmeier J, Grafe M, et al (Hrsg.): Wissenschaftsforum 2013-Intelligente Technische Systeme, 11. Paderborner Workshop “Augmented and Virtual Reality in der Produktentstehung” Paderborn, HNI Verlagsschriftenreihe, Vol. 311, pp 219–234 [in German]

  11. Blochwitz T, et al. (2012) Functional Mockup Interface 2.0: The standard for tool independent exchange of simulation models. In Proc. 9th International Modelica Conference, Munich, Germany

  12. Wiens R, et al. (2005) ChemCam science objectives for the mars science laboratory (MSL) Rover. In Proc. Lunar and Planetary Science, 36, pp 1580–1581

  13. Gallant M, Ellery A, Marshall J (2013) Rover-based autonomous science by probabilistic identification and evaluation. J Intell Robot Syst, Springer Netherlands, ISSN 0921-0296, pp 1–23, doi: 10.1007/s10846-013-9818-6

  14. Tompkins P, Stentz A, Wettergreen D (2004) Global path planning for mars rover exploration. In Proc. 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, USA

  15. Rossmann J, Schlette C, Emde M, Sondermann B (2010) Discussion of a self-localization and navigation unit for mobile robots in extraterrestrial environments. In Proc. 10th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i- SAIRAS), Sapporo, Japan, pp 46–53

  16. Rossmann J, Sondermann B, Emde M (2011) Virtual testbeds for planetary exploration: the self-localization aspect. In Proc. 11th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation (ASTRA 2011), ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp 1–8

  17. Roßmann J, Springer M, Wantia N et al (2011) Rapid generation of 3D navigation maps for extraterrestrial landing and exploration missions: the virtual testbed approach. In Proc. 11th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation (ASTRA 2011), ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

  18. Rossmann J, Jochmann G, Blümel F (2013) Semantic navigation maps for mobile robot localization on planetary surfaces. In 12th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation (ASTRA), ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp 1–8

  19. Mannel C, Müller H, Esser D (2012) Generating semi global elevation maps from planetary descent imagery using bundle adjustment. In Proc. 11th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS 2012), Turin, Italy

  20. Thrun S (2002) Particle filters in robotics. In Proc. 17th annual conference on Uncertainty in AI (UAI), Edmonton, Canada, pp 511–518

  21. Rossmann J, Jung T, Rast M (2010) Developing virtual testbeds for mobile robotic applications in the woods and on the moon. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2010), Taipei, Taiwan, pp 4952–4495

Download references

Acknowledgments

The projects Virtual Crater, FastMap and SELOK are funded by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) with funds provided by the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi) under Grant Numbers (50 RA 0913) for Virtual Crater, (50 RA 1034) for FastMap, and (50 RA 0911) for SELOK. We would like to thank our project partners form MMI, vH&S, SCISYS, CPA and DFKI for their valuable contributions to the works described in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregor Jochmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jochmann, G., Blümel, F., Stern, O. et al. The Virtual Space Robotics Testbed: Comprehensive Means for the Development and Evaluation of Components for Robotic Exploration Missions. Künstl Intell 28, 85–92 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-014-0293-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-014-0293-4

Keywords

Navigation