KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 75–78 | Cite as

From Texts to Networks: Detecting and Managing the Impact of Methodological Choices for Extracting Network Data from Text Data

Doctoral and Postdoctoral Dissertations

Abstract

This thesis (Diesner in Technical Report CMU-ISR-12-101, 2012) addresses a series of methodological problems related to extracting information on socio-technical networks from natural language text data. Theories and models from the social sciences are leveraged and combined with computational approaches to (a) construct, analyze and compare network data and (b) combine text data and network data for analysis. This thesis entails various projects that serve three purposes: First, the impact of various common coding choices, including reference resolution and co-occurrence-based link formation, on network data and analysis results is empirically identified across multiple types of text data and domains. Second, different relation extraction methods are compared across various over-time, open-source, large-scale datasets with respect to the resulting network data and analysis results. This study offers a complement to traditional strategies for accuracy assessment. The relation extraction methods considered include network data construction based on (a) manually versus automatically built thesauri, (b) meta-data, and (c) collaboration with subject matter experts. Third, the concepts of grouping and roles from network analysis are integrated with text mining methods to enable the theoretically grounded, joint consideration of text data and network data for real-world applications.

Overall, in this thesis, an interdisciplinary and computationally rigorous approach is used; thereby advancing the intersection of network analysis, natural language processing and computing. The contributions made with this work help people to utilize text data for network analysis, and to collect, manage and interpret rich network data at any scale. These steps are preconditions for asking substantive and graph-theoretic questions, testing hypotheses, and advancing theories about networks.

Keywords

Socio-technical networks Semantic networks Entity extraction Relation extraction Reference resolution Network clustering 

References

  1. 1.
    Abello J, Broadwell P, Tangherlini TR (2012) Computational folkloristics. Commun ACM 55(7):60–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alderson D (2008) Catching the ‘network science’ bug: insight and opportunity for the operations researcher. Oper Res 56(5):1047–1065 MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brin S (1999) Extracting patterns and relations from the World Wide Web. Paper presented at The World Wide Web and databases, Valencia, Spain, March 27–28, 1998, pp. 172–183 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burt R, Lin N (1977) Network time series from archival records. In: Heise DR (ed) Sociological methodology, vol 1977. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 224–254 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carley KM, Palmquist M (1991) Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Soc Forces 70(3):601–636 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Danowski JA (1993) Network analysis of message content. Prog Commun Sci 12:198–221 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diesner J (2012) Uncovering and managing the impact of methodological choices for the computational construction of socio-technical networks from texts. Technical report CMU-ISR-12-101 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diesner J, Carley KM (2010) Relation extraction from texts (in German, title: Extraktion relationaler Daten aus Texten). In: Stegbauer C, Häußling R (eds) Handbook network research (Handbuch Netzwerkforschung). Vs Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 507–521 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diesner J, Carley KM, Tambayong L (2012) Extracting socio-cultural networks of the Sudan from open-source, large-scale text data. Comput Math Organ Theory 18(3):328–339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerner D, Schrodt P, Francisco R, Weddle J (1994) Machine coding of event data using regional and international sources. Int Stud Q 38(1):91–119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hämmerli A, Gattiker R, Weyermann R (2006) Conflict and cooperation in an actors’ network of Chechnya based on event data. J Confl Resolut 50(2):159–175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartley R, Barnden J (1997) Semantic networks: visualizations of knowledge. Trends Cogn Sci 1(5):169–175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Janas J, Schwind C (1979) Extensional semantic networks. In: Findler NV (ed) Associative networks. Representation and use of knowledge by computers. Academic Press, New York, pp 267–302 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson JC, Krempel L (2004) Network visualization: The “Bush team” in Reuters news ticker, 9/11–11/15/01. J Soc Struct 5 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parastatidis S, Viegas E, Hey T (2009) Viewpoint: smart cyberinfrastructure for research. A view of semantic computing and its role in research. Commun ACM 52(12):33–37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trigg R, Weiser M (1986) TEXTNET: a network-based approach to text handling. ACM Trans Inf Syst 4(1):1–23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UIUCChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations