Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diversity and characterization of Azotobacter isolates obtained from rice rhizosphere soils in Taiwan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Azotobacter species, free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria, have been used as biofertilizers to improve the productivity of non-leguminous crops, including rice, due to their various plant growth-promoting traits. The purposes of this study were to characterize Azotobacter species isolated from rice rhizospheres in Taiwan and to determine the relationship between the species diversity of Azotobacter and soil properties. A total of 98 Azotobacter isolates were isolated from 27 paddy fields, and 16S rRNA gene sequences were used to identify Azotobacter species. The characteristics of these Azotobacter strains were analyzed including carbon source utilization and plant growth-promoting traits such as nitrogen fixation activity, indole acetic acid production, phosphate-solubilizing ability, and siderophore secretion. Of the 98 strains isolated in this study, 12 were selected to evaluate their effects on rice growth. Four species of Azotobacter were identified within these 98 strains, including A. beijerinckii, A. chroococcum, A. tropicalis, and A. vinelandii. Of these four species, A. chroococcum was predominant (51.0%) but A. beijerinckii had the highest level of nucleotide diversity. Strains within individual Azotobacter species showed diverse profiles in carbon source utilization. In addition, the species diversity of Azotobacter was significantly related to soil pH, Mn, and Zn. Members of the same Azotobacter species showed diverse plant growth-promoting traits, suggesting that the 98 strains isolated in this study may not equally effective in promoting rice growth. Of the 12 strains evaluated, A. beijerinckii CHB 461, A. chroococcum CHB 846, and A. chroococcum CHB 869 may be used to develop biofertilizers for rice cultivation because they significantly promoted rice growth. This study contributes to the selection of suitable Azotobacter strains for developing biofertilizer formulations and soil management strategies of Azotobacter for paddy fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS (2005) Indole acetic acid production by the indigenous isolates of Azotobacter and fluorescent Pseudomonas in the presence and absence of tryptophan. Turk J Biol 29:29–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander DB, Zuberer DA (1991) Use of chrome azurol S reagents to evaluate siderophore production by rhizosphere bacteria. Biol Fertil Soils 12:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aquilanti L, Favilli F, Clementi F (2004) Comparison of different strategies for isolation and preliminary identification of Azotobacter from soil samples. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1475–1483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (1998) Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Becking JH (2006) The family Azotobacteraceae. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S (eds) The Prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria. Springer, New York, pp 759–783

  • Bhatia R, Ruppel S, Narula N (2008) Diversity studies of Azotobacter spp. from cotton-wheat cropping systems of India. J Basic Microbiol 48:455–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury ATMA, Kennedy IR (2004) Prospects and potentials for systems of biological nitrogen fixation in sustainable rice production. Biol Fertil Soils 39:219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury ATMA, Zaman SK, Bhuiyan NI (1997) Nitrogen response behavior of four rice varieties under wetland culture. Thai J Agric Sci 30:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Das AC, Saha D (2007) Effect of diazotrophs on the mineralization of organic nitrogen in the rhizosphere soils of rice (Oryza sativa). J Crop Weed 3:47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng F, Wang L, Ren W-J, Mei X-F (2014) Enhancing nitrogen utilization and soil nitrogen balance in paddy fields by optimizing nitrogen management and using polyaspartic acid urea. Field Crops Res 169:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan Y-H, Yin X-M, Zhang Y-L, Shen Q-R (2007) Mechanisms of enhanced rice growth and nitrogen uptake by nitrate. Pedosphere 17:697–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehmann A (1977) The van Urk-Salkowski reagent—a sensitive and specific chromogenic reagent for silica gel thin-layer chromatographic detection and identification of indole derivatives. J Chromatogr 132:267–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green SJ, Inbar E, Michel FC Jr, Hadar Y, Minz D (2006) Succession of bacterial communities during early plant development: transition from seed to root and effect of compost amendment. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3975–3983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis programme for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy RWF, Burns RC, Holsten RD (1973) Application of the acetylene-ethylene assay for measurement of nitrogen fixation. Soil Biol Biochem 5:47–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Rannala B (1997) Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276:227–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Islam R et al (2010) Isolation, enumeration, and characterization of diazotrophic bacteria from paddy soil sample under long-term fertilizer management experiment. Biol Fertil Soils 46:261–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez DJ, Montaña JS, Martínez MM (2011) Characterization of free nitrogen fixing bacteria of the genus Azotobacter in organic vegetable-grown Colombian soils. Braz J Microbiol 42:846–858

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan T, Ponmurugan P (2010) Response of paddy (Oryza sativa L.) varieties to Azospirillum brasilense inoculation. J Phytol 2:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausar H, Sariah M, Saud HM, Alam M, Ismail M (2011) Isolation and screening of potential actinobacteria for rapid composting of rice straw. Biodegradation 22:367–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khush GS (2005) What it will take to feed 5.0 billion Rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol Biol 59:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin MA et al (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Limmer C, Drake HL (1998) Effects of carbon, nitrogen, and electron acceptor availability on anaerobic N2-fixation in a beech forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 30:153–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Toledo MV, Gonzalez-Lopez J, de la Rubia T, Ramos-Cormenzana A (1985) Isolation and characterization of Azotobacter chroococcum from the roots of Zea mays. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31:197–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muthukumarasamy R et al (2007) Enumeration, isolation and identification of diazotrophs from Korean wetland rice varieties grown with long-term application of N and compost and their short-term inoculation effect on rice plants. J Appl Microbiol 102:981–991

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Özen AI, Ussery DW (2012) Defining the Pseudomonas genus: where do we draw the line with Azotobacter? Microb Ecol 63:239–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piao Z et al (2005) Changes in acetylene reduction activities and effects of inoculated rhizosphere nitrogen-fixing bacteria on rice. Biol Fertil Soils 41:371–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poly F, Ranjard L, Nazaret S, Gourbière F, Monrozier LJ (2001) Comparison of nifH gene pools in soils and soil microenvironments with contrasting properties. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2255–2262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ponnamperuma FN (1972) The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv Agron 24:29–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posada D (2008) jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253–1256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z (2015) Availability of Mn, Zn and Fe in the rhizosphere. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 15:397–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio EJ, Montecchia MS, Tosi M, Cassan FD, Perticari A, Correa OS (2013) Genotypic characterization of azotobacteria isolated from Argentinean soils and plant-growth-promoting traits of selected strains with prospects for biofertilizer production. Sci World J 2013:519603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saharan BS, Nehra V (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sci Med Res 21:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo RK, Ansari MW, Dangar TK, Mohanty S, Tuteja N (2014) Phenotypic and molecular characterisation of efficient nitrogen-fixing Azotobacter strains from rice fields for crop improvement. Protoplasma 251:511–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwyn R, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for detection and estimation of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh N, Pal N, Mahajan G, Singh S, Shevkani K (2011) Rice grain and starch properties: effects of nitrogen fertilizer application. Carbohydr Polym 86:219–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL, Doran JW (1996) Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ (eds) Methods for assessing soil quality. SSSA special publication number 49. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 169–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg IF, Fedor PJ (2003) A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916-2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the 'Shannon-Wiener' index. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:177–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundara Rao WVB, Sinha MK (1963) Phosphate dissolving organisms in the soil and rhizosphere. Ind J Agric Sci 33:272–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2001) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parasimony (*and other methods). version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland

  • Sylvia DM, Fuhrmann JJ, Hartel PG, Zuberer DA (2005) Priciples and applications of soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tejera N, Lluch C, Martínez-Toledo MV, González-Lόpez J (2005) Isolation and characterization of Azotobacter and Azospirillum strains from the sugarcane rhizosphere. Plant Soil 270:223–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tening AS, Omueti JAI (2011) Suitability of extractants for predicting iron in soils of the humid zone of south-western Nigeria. Agric Biol J N Am 2:1244–1250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci 63:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA (1976) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. The International Rice Research Institute. Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaki N, Gomaa AM, Galal A, Farrag AA (2009) The associative impact of certain diazotrophs and farmyard manure on two rice varieties grown in a newly cultivated land. Res J Agric Biol Sci 5:185–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. PhD thesis, University of Texas

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. (NSC 102-2313-B-005-034-MY2) to C. -H. Huang. We thank R.-F. Wang and S.-R. Ye for their technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Hua Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, SL., Tsai, MK., Huang, YM. et al. Diversity and characterization of Azotobacter isolates obtained from rice rhizosphere soils in Taiwan. Ann Microbiol 68, 17–26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-017-1312-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-017-1312-0

Keywords

Navigation