Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro screen of Lactobacillus plantarum as probiotic bacteria and their fermented characteristics in soymilk

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One hundred and two strains of Lactobacillus plantarum, all isolated from traditional dairy products of minority nationalities, were evaluated for in vitro probiotic properties, including acid and bile tolerance, aggregation activity, and antibacterial activity. Of these, 12 strains with a high tolerance to simulated gastric juice (pH 2.5, 3 h of incubation) were selected, of which eight of these also showed a good tolerance to bile salt. All selected 12 strains showed a high autoaggregation percentage after being incubated at room temperature for 20 h, and nine of these significantly inhibited growth of the five indicator intestinal pathogens. Six L. plantarum strains (IMAU10120, IMAU10156, IMAU40126, IMAU70004, IMAU60042, and IMAU60171) were selected for further evaluation of their fermentation characteristics, sensory quality, and viable counts, both during the fermentation process of soymilk and following a 28-day storage of the soymilk. The six strains had an acid-producing ability at the refrigerated temperature. All of the fermented soymilk samples had a viable count above log 8.45 CFU/ml, and viability in the samples was maintained during storage. Based on both the probiotic properties and fermented characteristics, L. plantarum IMAU10120 was the best potential probiotic strain of those tested for the production of fermented functional soymilk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arai S, Suzuky H, Fujimake M, Sakurai Y (1996) Studies on flavour components in soybean. Part 2. Phenolic acids in defatted soybean flour. Agric Biol Chem 30:364–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buono MA, Setser C, Erickson LE, Fung DYC (1990) Soymilk yoghurt: sensory evaluation and chemical measurement. J Food Sci 55:528–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chateau N, Deschamps AM, Sassi AH (1994) Heterogeneity of bile salts resistance in the Lactobacillus isolates of a probiotic consortium. Lett Appl Microbiol 18:2–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun J, Kwon DY, Kim JS, Kim JH (2008) Sensory properties of soy yoghurts prepared from yellow and black soymilk using Streptococcus infantarius 12 and Weisellia sp. 4. J Sci Food Agric 88:1845–1849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S (2007) Measurement of aggregation properties between probiotics and pathogens: In vitro evaluation of different methods. J Microbiol Methods 71:71–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S (2008) Adhesion and aggregation properties of probiotic and pathogen strains. Eur Food Res Technol 226:1065–1073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conway PL, Gorbach SL, Goldin BR (1987) Survival of lactic acid bacteria in the human stomach and adhesion to intestinal cells. J Dairy Sci 70:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel WH, Haberer P, Geisen R, Björkroth J, Schillinger U (2001) Taxonomy and important features of probiotic microorganisms in food and nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 73:365–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh ML, Chou CC (2006) Mutagenicity and antimutagenic effect of soymilk fermented with lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 111:43–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jen-Wan H, Roch-Chui Y, Cheng-Chun C (2000) Changes in some components of soymilk during fermentation with bifidobacteria. Food Res Int 33:393–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin L, Hyun SY, Kyu WC, Sejong O, Sae HK, Taehoon C, Bongjoon K, Kwang YW (2011) Evaluation of probiotic characteristics of newly isolated Lactobacillus spp.: Immune modulation and longevity. Int J Food Microbiol 148:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kailasapathy K, Chin J (2000) Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organisms with reference to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. Immunol. Cell Biol 78:80–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kailasapathy K, Rybka S (1997) Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. – their therapeutic potential and survival in yogurt. Aust J Dairy Tech 52:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazuhiro H, Joseph R (2000) The role of probiotic bacteria in cancer prevention. Microbes Infection 2:681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitawaki R, Nishimura Y, Takagi N, Iwasaki M, Tsuzuki K, Fukuda M (2009) Effects of Lactobacillus fermented soymilk and soy yogurt on hepatic lipid accumulation in rats fed a cholesterol-free diet. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 73:1484–1488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YK, Salminen S (1995) The coming of age of probiotics. Trends Food Sci Technol 6:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo RF, Freitas RJ, Pandey A, Soccol CR (1999) Production and shelf-life studies of low cost beverage with soymilk, buffalo cheese whey and cow milk fermented by mixed cultures of Lactobacillus casei ssp. shirota and Bifidobacteriumadolescentis. J Basic Microbiol 39:243–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osaana ND, Henriksson A, Vasiljevic T, Shah NP (2007) α-Galactosidase and proteolytic activities of selected probiotic and dairy cultures in fermented soymilk. Food Chem 104:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvez S, Malik KA, Kang SA, Kim HY (2006) Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. J Appl Microbiol 100:1171–1185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid G, Sanders ME, Gaskins HR, Gibson GR, Mercenier A, Rastall RA, Roberfroid MB, Rowland I, Cherbut C, Klaenhammer TR (2003) New scientific paradigms for probiotics and prebiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol 37:105–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rekha CR, Vijayalakshmi G (2011) Isoflavone phytoestrogens in soymilk fermented with β-glucosidase producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Sci Nutr 62:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador A, Fiszman SM (2004) Textural and sensory characteristics of whole and skimmed flavored set-type yogurt during long storage. J Dairy Sci 87:4033–4041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders ME, Klaenhammer TR (2001) Invited Review: The scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. J Dairy Sci 84:319–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scalabrini P, Rossi M, Spettoli P, Matteuzzi D (1998) Characterization of Bifidobacterium strains for use in soymilk fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 39:213–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shimakawa Y, Matsubara S, Yuki N, Ikeda M, Ishikawa F (2003) Evaluation of Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult-fermented soymilk as a probiotic food. Int J Food Microbiol 81:131–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tharmaraj N, Shah NP (2003) Selective enumeration of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Propionibacteria. J Dairy Sci 86:2288–2296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsangalis D, Shah NP (2004) Metabolism of oligosaccharides and aldehydes and production of organic acids in soymilk by probiotic bifidobacteria. Int J Food Sci Technol 39:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinderola G, Capellini B, Villarreal F, Suárez V, Quiberoni A, Reinheimer J (2008) Usefulness of a set of simple in vitro tests for the screening and identification of probiotic candidate strains for dairy use. LWT–Food Sci Technol 41:1678–1688

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker DK, Gilliland SE (1993) Relationship among bile tolerance, bile salt deconjugation, and assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Dairy Sci 76:956–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YC, Yu RC, Chou CC (2002) Growth and survival of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria during the fermentation and storage of cultured soymilk drink. Food Microbiol 19:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YC, Yu RC, Chou CC (2006) Antioxidative activities of soymilk fermented with lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Food Microbiol 23:128–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams NT (2010) Probiotics. Am J Health Syst Pharm 67:449–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan B, Yanchao Z, Yong Z, Yong L, Shuiquan W, Ximei D, Yanyan W, Heping Z (2010) Screening of potential probiotic properties of Lactobacillus fermentum isolated from traditional dairy products. Food Control 21:695–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Planning) (Grant 2007AA10Z353), Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of China and National Key Technology R and D Program (No.2009BADC1B01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tiansong Sun or Heping Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bao, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, H. et al. In vitro screen of Lactobacillus plantarum as probiotic bacteria and their fermented characteristics in soymilk. Ann Microbiol 62, 1311–1320 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0377-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0377-4

Keywords

Navigation