BioChip Journal

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 63–67 | Cite as

A block-based imputation approach with adaptive LD blocks for fast genotype imputation

  • Jaeyoung Kim
  • Miyoung ShinEmail author
  • Myungguen Chung
  • Kiejung Park
Original Research


This paper addresses the issue of improving long imputation time usually required for a large volume of SNP genotype data which can be easily obtained by biological experiments with the genomewide SNP chip or the next-generation sequencing technology. For this purpose, we propose a block-based imputation approach that generates adaptive LD blocks with observed SNP genotype data and applies an imputation procedure for each block separately. Also, we implemented the block based imputation to maximize the use of computing resources. Specifically, each task of block imputation is allocated to individual processor and is executed on each processor independently. Thus, multiple tasks of block imputation can be executed on multiple processors in parallel where the parallelization can reach up to the maximum number of processors allowed by user’s computing environment. Our experiment was performed with Mao et al.’s prostate cancer dataset. The results show that our adaptive block approach can reduce the imputation time up to 60–70% of original imputation time given by MaCH without the loss of imputation accuracy.


SNP chip Next Generation Sequencing Imputation Linkage disequilibrium block Haplotype reference panel 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ellinghaus, D., Schreiber, S., Franke, A. & Nothnagel, M. Current software for genotype imputation. Hum. Genomics 3, 371–380 (2009).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nothnagel, M., Ellinghaus, D., Schreiber, S., Krawczak, M. & Franke, A. A comprehensive evaluation of SNP genotype imputation. Human Genetics 125, 163–171 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, B. et al. Practical Consideration of Genotype Imputation: Sample Size, Window Size, Reference Choice, and Untyped Rate. Stat. Interface 4, 339–352 (2011).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Li, Y. & Abecasis, G.R. Mach 1.0: Rapid haplotype reconstruction and missing genotype inference. Am. J. Hum. Genet. S79, 2290 (2006).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    BEAGLE Genetic Analysis Software Package,
  8. 8.
    Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marchini, J. et al. A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes. Nat. Genet. 39, 906–913 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    International HapMap Project,
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Anderson, C.A. et al. Evaluating the effects of imputation on the power, coverage, and cost efficiency of genome-wide SNP platforms. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 83, 112–119 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheet, P. & Stephens, M. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: Applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 629–644 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howie, B., Marchini, J. & Stephens, M. Genotype imputation with thousands of genomes. G3: Genes, Genomics, Genetics 1, 457–470 (2011).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baum, L.E. & Petria, T. Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Morkov chains. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 37, 1554–1563 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sanna, S. et al. Common variants in the GDF5-UQCC region are associated with variation in human height. Nat. Genet. 40, 198–203 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO).
  18. 18.
    Barrett, J.C., Fry, B., Maller, J. & Daly, M.J. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21, 263–265 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gabriel, S.B. et al. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 296, 2225–2229 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Benusiglio, P.R. et al. Common ERBB2 polymorphisms and risk of breast cancer in a white British population: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 7, 204–209 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean BioChip Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaeyoung Kim
    • 1
  • Miyoung Shin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Myungguen Chung
    • 2
  • Kiejung Park
    • 2
  1. 1.Bio-Intelligence & Data Mining Laboratory, Graduate School of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceKyungpook National UniversityDaeguKorea
  2. 2.Division of Bio-Medical Informatics, Center for Genome ScienceKorea National Institute of HealthChungcheongbuk-doKorea

Personalised recommendations