Abstract
In innate immunity, the first layer of defense against any microbial infection is triggered by the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns by highly specific pattern recognition receptors. The Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are plant-pathogenic bacterial species that include pathogenic strains in a wide range of different plant species. In the current study, extensive analysis including gene expression of 12 hub genes, gene ontology, protein–protein interaction, and cis-element prediction to dissect the Arabidopsis response to above-mentioned bacteria were performed. Further, we evaluated weighted co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) in the wild-type plants and coi-1 mutant line and determined changes in responsive genes at two time-points (4 and 8 h) of post-treatment with P. syringae and P. aeruginosa. Compared to the wild-type plants, coi-1 mutant showed significant expression in most of the genes involved, indicating that their protein products have important role in innate immunity and RNA silencing pathways. Our findings showed that 12 hub genes were co-expressed in response to P. syringae and P. aeruginosa infections. Based on the network analysis, transcription factors, receptors, protein kinase, and pathogenesis-related protein (PR1) were involved in the immunity system. Gene ontology related to each module was involved in defense response, protein serine kinase activity, and primary miRNA processing. Based on the cis-elements prediction, MYB, MYC, WRE3, W-box, STRE, and ARE contained the most number of cis-elements in co-expressed network genes. Also, in coi-1 mutant, most responsive genes against theses pathogens were up-regulated. The knowledge gained in the gene expression analysis in response to P. syringae and P. aeruginosa in the model plant, i.e., Arabidopsis, is essential to allow us to gain more insight about the innate immunity in other crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Abdellatef E, Kamal NM, Tsujimoto H (2021) Tuning beforehand: a foresight on RNA interference (RNAi) and in vitro-derived dsRNAs to enhance crop resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses. Int J Mol Sci 22(14):7687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147687
Abdullah-Zawawi MR, Ahmad-Nizammuddin NF, Govender N, Harun S, Mohd-Assaad N, Mohamed-Hussein ZA (2021) Comparative genome-wide analysis of WRKY, MADS-box and MYB transcription factor families in Arabidopsis and rice. Sci Rep 11(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99206-y
Balazadeh S, Kwasniewski M, Caldana C, Mehrnia M, Zanor MI, Xue GP, Mueller-Roeber B (2011) ORS1, an H2O2-responsive NAC transcription factor, controls senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant 4(2):346–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq080
Borsani O, Zhu J, Verslues PE, Sunkar R, Zhu JK (2005) Endogenous siRNAs derived from a pair of natural cis-antisense transcripts regulate salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Cell 123(7):1279–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.035
Cai H, Yang S, Yan Y, Xiao Z, Cheng J, Wu J, Qiu A, Lai Y, Mou S, Guan D, Huang R (2015) CaWRKY6 transcriptionally activates CaWRKY40, regulates Ralstonia solanacearum resistance, and confers high-temperature and high-humidity tolerance in pepper. J Exp Bot 66(11):3163–3174
Cui X, Yan Q, Gan S, Xue D, Wang H, Xing H, Zhao J, Guo N (2019) GmWRKY40, a member of the WRKY transcription factor genes identified from Glycine max L., enhanced the resistance to Phytophthora sojae. BMC Plant Biol 19(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2132-0
Cui DL, Meng JY, Ren XY, Yue JJ, Fu HY, Huang MT, Zhang QQ, Gao SJ (2020) Genome-wide identification and characterization of DCL, AGO and RDR gene families in Saccharum spontaneum. Sci Rep 10(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70061-7
Dang FF, Wang YN, Yu LU, Eulgem T, Lai YA, Liu ZQ, Wang XU, Qiu AL, Zhang TX, Lin J, Chen YS (2013) CaWRKY40, a WRKY protein of pepper, plays an important role in the regulation of tolerance to heat stress and resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Plant Cell Environ 36(4):757–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12011
Durian G, Rahikainen M, Alegre S, Brosché M, Kangasjärvi S (2016) Protein phosphatase 2A in the regulatory network underlying biotic stress resistance in plants. Front Plant Sci 10(7):812
Durian G, Jeschke V, Rahikainen M, Vuorinen K, Gollan PJ, Brosché M, Salojärvi J, Glawischnig E, Winter Z, Li S, Noctor G (2020) PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A-B′ γ controls Botrytis cinerea resistance and developmental leaf senescence. Plant Physiol 182(2):1161–1181. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.00893
Elshobaky A, Lillo C, Hoden K, Kataya A (2023) Identification of novel interactors of PP2A-B′ ζ. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.20.541568
Flury P, Klauser D, Schulze B, Boller T, Bartels S (2013) The anticipation of danger: microbe-associated molecular pattern perception enhances AtPep-triggered oxidative burst. Plant Physiol 161(4):2023–2035. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.216077
Fukudome A, Fukuhara T (2017) Plant dicer-like proteins: double-stranded RNA-cleaving enzymes for small RNA biogenesis. J Plant Res 130(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-016-0877-1
Henderson IR, Zhang X, Lu C, Johnson L, Meyers BC, Green PJ, Jacobsen SE (2006) Dissecting Arabidopsis thaliana DICER function in small RNA processing, gene silencing and DNA methylation patterning. Nat Genet 38:721–725. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1804
Klauser D, Desurmont GA, Glauser G, Vallat A, Flury P, Boller T, Turlings TC, Bartels S (2015) The Arabidopsis Pep-PEPR system is induced by herbivore feeding and contributes to JA-mediated plant defence against herbivory. J Exp Bot 66(17):5327–5336. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv250
Kurihara Y, Watanabe Y (2004) Arabidopsis micro-RNA biogenesis through Dicer-like 1 protein functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12753–12758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403115101
Lefevere H, Bauters L, Gheysen G (2020) Salicylic acid biosynthesis in plants. Front Plant Sci 17(11):338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00338
Liu QL, Zhong M, Li S, Pan YZ, Jiang BB, Jia Y, Zhang HQ (2013) Overexpression of a chrysanthemum transcription factor gene, DgWRKY3, in tobacco enhances tolerance to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 69:27–33
Liu X, Song Y, Xing F, Wang N, Wen F, Zhu C (2016) GhWRKY25, a group I WRKY gene from cotton, confers differential tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. Protoplasma 253:1265–1281
Ovens K, Eames BF, McQuillan I (2021) Comparative analyses of gene co-expression networks: implementations and applications in the study of evolution. Front Genet 12:695399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.695399
Ross A, Yamada K, Hiruma K, Yamashita-Yamada M, Lu X, Takano Y, Tsuda K, Saijo Y (2014) The Arabidopsis PEPR pathway couples local and systemic plant immunity. EMBO J 33(1):62–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/embj.201284303
Saidi A, Hajibarat Z (2021) Genome wide identification of StKNOX gene family and characterization of their expression in Solanum tuberosum. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 1(37):102160
Saidi A, Hajibarat Z, Hajibarat Z (2020) Identification of responsive genes and analysis of genes with bacterial-inducible Cis-regulatory elements in the promoter regions in Oryza sativa L. Acta Agric Slov 116(1):115–123
Safaeizadeh M, Boller T (2019) Differential and tissue-specific activation pattern of the AtPROPEP and AtPEPR genes in response to biotic and abiotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal Behav 14(5):e1590094. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2019.1590094
Segonzac C, Macho AP, Sanmartín M, Ntoukakis V, Sánchez-Serrano JJ, Zipfel C (2014) Negative control of BAK1 by protein phosphatase 2A during plant innate immunity. EMBO J 33:2069–2079
Shaik R, Ramakrishna W (2013) Genes and co-expression modules common to drought and bacterial stress responses in Arabidopsis and rice. PLoS ONE 8:e77261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077261
Silo-Suh L, Suh SJ, Sokol PA, Ohman DE (2002) A simple alfalfa seedling infection model for Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains associated with cystic fibrosis shows AlgT (sigma-22) and RhlR contribute to pathogenesis. PNAS. 99(24):15699–15704
Trotta A, Wrzaczek M, Scharte J, Tikkanen M, Konert G, Rahikainen M, Holmström M, Hiltunen HM, Rips S, Sipari N, Mulo P (2011) Regulatory subunit B′ γ of protein phosphatase 2A prevents unnecessary defense reactions under low light in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 156(3):1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.178442
Trinks D, Rajeswaran R, Shivaprasad PV, Akbergenov R, Oakeley EJ, Veluthambi K, Hohn T, Pooggin MM (2005) Suppression of RNA silencing by a geminivirus nuclear protein, AC2, correlates with transactivation of host genes. Virol J 79(4):2517–2527. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.4.2517-2527.2005
van Dam S, Võsa U, van der Graaf A, Franke L, de Magalhães JP (2017) Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene–disease predictions. Brief Bioinform 19:575–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbw139
Wang X, Yan Y, Li Y, Chu X, Wu C, Guo X (2014) GhWRKY40, a multiple stress-responsive cotton WRKY gene, plays an important role in the wounding response and enhances susceptibility to Ralstonia solanacearum infection in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS ONE 9(4):e93577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093577
Wang Y, Duan F, Zhu Z, Yu M, Jia X, Dai H, Wang P, Qiu X, Lu Y, Huang J (2021) Analysis of TCR repertoire by high-throughput sequencing indicates the feature of T cell immune response after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cells 11(1):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11010068
Yamada K, Yamashita-Yamada M, Hirase T, Fujiwara T, Tsuda K, Hiruma K, Saijo Y (2016) Danger peptide receptor signaling in plants ensures basal immunity upon pathogen-induced depletion of BAK 1. EMBO J 35(1):46–61. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201591807
Yao J, Withers J, He SY (2013) Pseudomonas syringae infection assays in Arabidopsis. Methods Mol Biol 1011:63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-414-2_6
Zhu M, Xie H, Wei X, Dossa K, Yu Y, Hui S, Tang G, Zeng X, Yu Y, Hu P, Wang J (2019) WGCNA analysis of salt-responsive core transcriptome identifies novel hub genes in rice. Genes 10(9):719. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10090719
Zogopoulos VL, Saxami G, Malatras A, Papadopoulos K, Tsotra I, Iconomidou VA, Michalopoulos I (2022) Approaches in gene co-expression analysis in eukaryotes. Biology 11(7):1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11071019
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the University of Basel to provide the Arabidopsis seeds. Special thanks to our colleagues at the Department of Cell and Molecular biology for their helpful support, Shahid Beheshti University. This research work was supported by the Research section of the Shahid Beheshti University.
Funding
There is no funding available for current research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZH carried out literature search and assisting in designing of the manuscript. AS was involved in designing of the research, provided financial support, and edited the manuscript. ZH and MS drew all the figures of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Saidi, A., Safaeizadeh, M. & Hajibarat, Z. Differential expression of the genes encoding immune system components in response to Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Arabidopsis thaliana. 3 Biotech 14, 11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-023-03852-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-023-03852-0