Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of plant vigor and soil health using two agriusable nanocompounds and plant growth promotory rhizobacteria in Fenugreek

  • Original Article
  • Published:
3 Biotech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Application of nanocompounds and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) plays an important role in improving plant growth and soil health. In the present study, response of two PGPR (PS2-KX650178 and PS10-KX650179) along with nanozeolite and nanochitosan was studied on Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), on the basis of physiological and biochemical parameters of soil and plant in pot experiment for 45 days. A significant increase (1.5–2 folds) in plant height, leaf number, leaf area and fresh weight over control was observed in Fenugreek plants when treated with nanocompounds and PGPR. Combined treatment also showed the highest level of total chlorophyll (3.27 mg g−1), sugar (6.14 μg mg−1 dry wt), soluble leaf protein (295.37 mg g−1 fresh weight) and catalase activity (23.84 U g−1 tissue) in Fenugreek plants. GC–MS analysis of plant metabolites revealed the abundance of phenols which are known to improve biotic/abiotic stresses in plants. Activity of Fluorescein Diacetate hydrolase enzyme was 2.5 times higher in the combined treatment of nanozeolite with PS10 than in control. An increase of 11% in alkaline phosphatase activity was observed in the same treatment with respect to control. The results obtained from the pot experiment clearly indicate that nanocompounds along with PGPR improved the growth of plants and soil health which suggest their benefits in agriculture practices to increase crop production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Abbreviations

ZnONPs:

Zinc oxide nanoparticles

CEC:

Cation exchange capacity

FDA:

Fluorescein diacetate

TOC:

Total organic carbon

Nch:

Nanochitosan

Nz:

Nanozeolite

SNPs:

Silver nanoparticles

Fe3O4 :

Iron oxide

SWCNTs:

Single-walled carbon nanotubes

References

  • Aminiyan MM, Hosseini H, Heydariyan A (2018) Microbial communities and their characteristics in a soil amended by nanozeolite and some plant residues: short time in-situ incubation. Eurasian J Soil Sci 7:9–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Appanna V (2007) Efficacy of phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from vertisols on growth and yield parameters of sorghum. Res J Microbiol 2:550559

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora S, Sharma P, Kumar S, Nayan R, Khanna PK, Zaidi MGH (2012) Gold-nanoparticle induced enhancement in growth and seed yield of Brassica juncea. Plant Growth Reg 66:303–310

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandick AK, Dick RP (1999) Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 31(11):1471–1479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1–2):248–254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke DJ, Pietrasiak N, Samia ACS (2015) Iron oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticle effects on plant performance and root associated microbes. Int J Mol Sci 10:23630–23650

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell BA (2005) Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity: a review. Pedobiologia 49(6):637–644

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casida LE Jr, Klein DA, Santoro T (1964) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci 98(6):371–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chai H, Yao J, Sun J, Zhang C, Liu W, Zhu M, Ceccanti B (2015) The effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on functional bacteria and metabolic profiles in agricultural soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 94(4):490–495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S, Chakraborty N, Dasgupta A, Sarkar J, Panda K, Krishnendu AK (2015) Chitosan nanoparticles: a positive modulator of innate immune responses in plants. Sci Rep 5:15195

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra NS, Keelara VHP, Niranjan RS, Venkataramana M, Vijai KG, Naveen KK, Xiao FD, Jie YC, Andrei M, Bhim PS, Rakesh KS (2018) Chitosan nanoparticles having higher degree of acetylation induce resistance against pearl millet downy mildew through nitric oxide generation. Sci Rep 8:2485

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary P, Sharma A (2019) Response of nanogypsum on the performance of plant growth promotory bacteria recovered from nanocompound infested agriculture field. Environ Ecol 37(1B):363–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary CR, Kumaraswamy VR, Kumari S, Sharma SS, Pal A, Raliya R, Biswas P, Saharan V (2017) Cu-chitosan nanoparticle boost defense responses and plant growth in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci Rep 7:9754

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen LG, Tilston EL, Mitchell GR, Collins CD, Shaw LJ (2011) Assessing the impact of nano-and micro-scale zerovalent iron particles on soil microbial activities: particle reactivity interferes with assay conditions and interpretation of genuine microbial effects. Chemosphere 82(11):1675–1682

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca TH, DeLuca DK (1997) Composting for feedlot manure management and soil quality. J Prod Agri 10(2):235–241

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Calorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28(3):350–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durairaj B, Santhoshkumar M, Xavier T (2015) Effect of Fungal generated n-TiO2 on Fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum) seed germination and seedling growth. J Global Biosci 4(5):2319–2325

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott ET, Cambardella CA, Cole CV (1993) Modification of ecosystem processes by management and the mediation of soil organic matter dynamics. Plant Soil 22:129–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsheery NB, Helaly MN, El-Hoseiny HM, Alam-Eldein SM (2020a) Zinc oxide and silicone nanoparticles to improve the resistance mechanism and annual productivity of salt-stressed mango trees. Agronomy 10:558

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsheery NI, Sunoj VSJ, Wen Y, Zhu JJ, Muralidharan G, Cao KF (2020b) Foliar application of nanoparticles mitigates the chilling effect onphotosynthesis and photoprotection in sugarcane. Plant Physiol Biochem 149:50–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang G, Si Y, Tian C (2012) Degradation of 2, 4-D in soils by Fe3O4 nanoparticles combined with stimulating indigenous microbes. Env Sci Pollut Res 19(3):784–793

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao FQ, Hong FH, Liu C, Zheng L, Su MY, Wu X, Yang F, Wu C, Yang P (2006) Mechanism of nanoanatase TiO2 on promoting photosynthetic carbon reaction of spinach-inducing complex of rubisco-rubisco activase. Biol Trace Elem Res 111:239–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Scientifica, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath K, Gowri S, Karthika V, Arumugam A (2014) Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles from fruit extract of Terminalia arjuna, for the enhanced seed germination activity Gloriosa superba. J Nanostr Chem 4:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto M, Ehara H, Karita S, Takabe K, Ogawa N, Yamada Y, Ogawa S, Yahaya MS, Morita O (2003) Protective effect of silicon on phenolic biosynthesis and ultraviolet spectral stress in rice crop. Plant Sci 164:349–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He F, Wang H, Chen Q, Yang B, Gao Y, Wang L (2015) Short-term response of soil enzyme activity and soil respiration to repeated carbon nanotubes exposure. Soil Sediment Contam 24(3):250–261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helaly MN, El-Metwally MA, El-Hoseiny H, Omar SA, El-Sheery NI (2014) Effect of nanoparticles on biological contamination of in vitro cultures and organogenic regeneration of banana. Aust J Crop Sci 8:612–624

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helaly MN, El-Hoseinyb H, El-Sheeryc NI, Rastogi A, Kalajif HM (2017) Regulation and physiological role of silicon in alleviating drought stress of mango. Plant Physio Biochem 118:31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscox JT, Israelstam GF (1979) A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can J Bot 57(12):1332–1334

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imtiaz M, Rizwan MS, Mushtaq MA, Ashraf M, Shahzad SM, Yousaf B, Saeed DA, Rizwan M, Nawaz MA, Mehmood S, Tu S (2016) Silicon occurrence, uptake, transport and mechanisms of heavy metals, minerals and salinity enhanced tolerance in plants with future prospects: a review. J Environ Manage 183:521–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jhanzab HM, Razzaq A, Jilani G, Rehman A, Hafeez A, Yasmeen F (2015) Silver nano-particles enhance the growth, yield and nutrient use efficiency of wheat. Int J Agron Agri Res 7(1):15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju W, Liu L, Jin X, Duan C, Cui Y, Wang J, Ma D, Zhao W, Wang Y, Fang L (2020) Co-inoculation effect of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and rhizobium on EDDS assisted phytoremediation of Cu contaminated soils. Chemosphere 254:126724

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khalifa MMA, Fetian NAH, Abdel Magid MS, El-Sheery NI (2017) Effectiveness of potassium silicate in suppression white rot disease andenhancement physiological resistance of onion plants, and its role on the soil microbial community. Middle East J Agric Res 6:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Khati P, Chaudhary P, Gangola S, Bhatt P, Sharma A (2017) Nanochitosan supports growth of Zea mays and also maintains soil health following growth. 3 Biotech 7:81

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khati P, Chaudhary P, Bhatt P, Nisha KR, Sharma A (2018) Effect of nanozeolite and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on maize. 3 Biotech 8:141

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khati P, Chaudhary P, Gangola S, Sharma A (2019a) Influence of nanozeolite on plant growth promotory bacterial isolates recovered from nanocompound infested agriculture field. Environ Ecol 37(2):521–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Khati P, Sharma A, Chaudhary P, Singh AK, Gangola S, Kumar R (2019b) High-throughput sequencing approach to access the impact of nanozeolite treatment on species richness and evens of soil metagenome. Biocatal Agri Biotech 20:101249

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodakovskaya MV, de Silva K, Biris AS, Dervishi E, Villagarcia H (2012) Carbon nanotubes induce growth enhancement of tobacco cells. ACS Nano 6(3):2128–2135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk JOT, Allen RL (1965) Dependence of chloroplast pigment synthesis on protein synthesis: effect of actidione. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 21(6):523–530

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kukreti B, Sharma A, Chaudhary P, Agri U, Maithani D (2020) Influence of nanosilicon dioxide along with bioinoculants on Zea mays and its rhizospheric soil. 3 Biotech 10:345

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak J, Yoon S, An Y (2017) Long-term effects of ZnO nanoparticles on exoenzyme activities in planted soils. Envi Eng Res 22(2):224–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis WE, Shull CA (1937) Methods in plant physiology, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck H (1963) Catalase. In: Begmeyer HU (ed) Methods of enzymatic analysis. Academic press, New York, pp 895–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugtenberg BJ, Dekkers L, Bloemberg GV (2001) Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Ann Rev Phytopath 39(1):461–490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma LJ, Li YY, Yu CM, Wang Y, Li XM, Li N (2014) Germination and physiological response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to pre-soaking with oligochitosan. Int J Agric Bio 16:766–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodzadeh H, Nabavi M, Kashefi H (2013) Effect of nanoscale titanium dioxide particles on the germination and growth of canola (Brassica napus). J Ornam Hortic Plants 3(1):25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, CF, Storey S, Clipson N, Doyle E (2017) Soil microbial community responses to contamination with silver, aluminium oxide and silicon dioxide nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 26:449–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mintova S, Grand J, Valtchev V (2016) Nanosized zeolites: Quo Vadis? C R Chim 19(1):183–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay SS (2014) Nanotechnology in agriculture prospects and constraints. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 7:63–71

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi S, Jamei R (2014) Effect of silver nanoparticles and Pb(NO3)2 on the yield and chemical composition of mung bean (Vigna radiata). J Stress Physio Biochem 10(1):316–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Naser HM, Hanan E, Elsheery NI (2016) Effect of biofertilizers and putrescine amine on the physiological features and productivity of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera, L.) grown on reclaimed-salinized soil. Trees 30:1149–1161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J Biol Chem 153(2):375–380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ok CH, Anderson SH, Ervin EH (2003) Amendments and construction systems for improving the performance of sand-based putting greens. Agro J 95(6):1583–1590

    Google Scholar 

  • Olanrewaju OS, Babalola OO (2019) Bacterial consortium for improved maize (Zea mays) production. Microorganisms 7:519

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • India Country Overview (2008) World Bank Report.https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/india/overview

  • Parul (2019)Application of conventional and metagenomic approaches to analyse the effect of nanocompounds and indigenous bioinoculants on the health of soil and Zea mays. Ph.D. Thesis G.B.P.U.A&T Pantnagar

  • Phillips N, Edwards J (2006) Cereal seed quality after drought. State of New South Wales trough NSW, Department of Primary Industries

  • Polat E, Karaca M, Demir H, Onus AN (2004) Use of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) in agriculture. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 12(1):183–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pullagurala VLR, Adisa IO, Rawat S, Kalagara S, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey J (2018) ZnO nanoparticles increase photosynthetic pigments and decrease lipid peroxidation in soil grown cilantro (Coriandrum sativum). Plant Physiol Biochem 132:120–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Raliya R, Tarafdar JC (2013) ZnO nanoparticle biosynthesis and its effect on phosphorous-mobilizing enzyme secretion and gum contents in cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agri Res 2:48–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raskar SV, Laware SL (2014) Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on cytology and seed germination in onion. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3(2):467–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi A, Tripathi DK, Yadav S, Chauhan DK, Živčak M, Ghorbanpour M, El-Sheery NI, Brestic M (2019) Application of silicon nanoparticles in agriculture. 3 Biotech 9:90

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sadasivam S, Manikam A (1992) Total carbohydrate by anthrone method biochemical methods for agricultural science. Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Salama HMH (2012) Effects of silver nanoparticles in some crop plants, Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and corn (Zea mays L.). Int Res J Biotech 3:190–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnurer J, Rosswall T (1982) Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Appl Environ Microbiol 43(6):1256–1261

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P, Bhatt D, Zaidi MGH, Saradhi PP, Khanna PK, Arora S (2012) Silver nanoparticle-mediated enhancement in growth and antioxidant status of Brassica juncea. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 167(8):2225–2233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin YJ, Kwak JI, An YJ (2012) Evidence for the inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles on the activities of soil exoenzymes. Chemosphere 88(4):524–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siddaiah NC, Keelara VHP, Niranjan RS, Venkataramana M, Vijai KG, Naveen KK, Xiao FD, Jie YC, Andrei M, Bhim PS, Rakesh KS (2018) Chitosan nanoparticles having higher degree of acetylation induce resistance against pearl millet downy mildew through nitric oxide generation. Sci Rep 8:2485

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi MH (2014) Role of nano-SiO2 in germination of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum seeds Mill.). Saudi J Biological Sci 21(1):13–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siva GV (2016) Iron oxide nanoparticles promotes agronomic traits of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Int J Adv Res Biol Sci 3(3):230–237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanova AN, Yun J, Likhacheva AV, Alonso JM (2007) Multilevel interactions between ethylene and auxin in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 19:2169–2185

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Suriyaprabha R, Karunakaran G, Kavitha K, Yuvakkumar R, Rajendran V, Kannan N (2013) Application of silica nanoparticles in maize to enhance fungal resistance. IET Nanobiotech 8:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Szostak R (1992) Handbook of molecular sieves. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, p 524

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatise activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1(4):301–307

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timmusk S, Seisenbaeva G, Behers L (2018) Titania (TiO2) nanoparticles enhance the performance of growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Sci Rep 8:617

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wu M, Ruo-chao H, Xiao-hai T, Xiao-ling W, Guo-hui M, Hai-tao T (2010) Effect of adding Nano-carbon in slow release fertilizer on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of super hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice 4:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Zhang Y, Zhu L, Huang Y, Lu J (2011) Influence of growing season on phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of grape berries from vines grown in subtropical climate. J Agric Food Chem 59:1078–1086

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K, Xu NS, Su WW (2010) Co-immobilized enzymes in magnetic chitosan beads for improved hydrolysis of macromolecular substrates under a time-varying magnetic field. J Biotechnol 148(2):119–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yien L, Zin NM, Sarwar A, Katas H (2012) Antifungal activity of chitosan nanoparticles and correlation with their physical properties. Inter J Biomater 9:632698

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH (1972) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice, 2nd edn. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge facilities provided by Department of Microbiology of G.B.Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SK: research work, participated in all the experiments. AS: provided the laboratory facilities and critical checking of the manuscript. PC: wrote the manuscript and helped in data analysis. PK: isolated and characterized the bacterial culture used in the experiment.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parul Chaudhary.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 246 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, S., Sharma, A., Chaudhary, P. et al. Management of plant vigor and soil health using two agriusable nanocompounds and plant growth promotory rhizobacteria in Fenugreek. 3 Biotech 10, 461 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02448-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02448-2

Keywords