New breeding technique “genome editing” for crop improvement: applications, potentials and challenges
- 401 Downloads
Crop improvement is a continuous process in agriculture which ensures ample supply of food, fodder and fiber to burgeoning world population. Despite tremendous success in plant breeding and transgenesis to improve the yield-related traits, there have been several limitations primarily with the specificity in genetic modifications and incompatibility of host species. Because of this, new breeding techniques (NBTs) are gaining worldwide attention for crop improvement programs. Among the NBTs, genome editing (GE) using site-directed nucleases (SDNs) is an important and potential technique that overcomes limitations associated with classical breeding and transgenesis. These SDNs specifically target a compatible region in the gene/genome. The meganucleases (MgN), zinc finger nucleases (ZFN), transcription activator-like effectors nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated endonuclease (Cas) are being successfully employed for GE. These can be used for desired or targeted modifications of the native endogenous gene(s) or targeted insertion of cis/trans elements in the genomes of recipient organisms. Applications of these techniques appear to be endless ever since their discovery and several modifications in original technologies have further brought precision and accuracy in these methods. In this review, we present an overview of GE using SDNs with an emphasis on CRISPR/Cas system, their advantages, limitations and also practical considerations while designing experiments have been discussed. The review also emphasizes on the possible applications of CRISPR for improving economic traits in crop plants.
KeywordsNew breeding technique (NBT) Site-directed nucleases (SDNs) Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) Transcription activator-like effectors nucleases (TALENs) Cluster regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas)
Authors are thankful to Director, ICAR-IIRR for encouragement and support.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
- Chawla R, Shakya R, Rommens CM et al (2012) Tuber-specific silencing of asparagine synthetase-1 reduces the acrylamide-forming potential of potatoes grown in the field without affecting tuber shape and yield. Plant Biotechnol Commun 5:3352Google Scholar
- Chen X, Lu X, Shu N, Wang S, Wang J, Wang D, Guo L, Ye W (2017) Targeted mutagenesis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep 7:44304Google Scholar
- Jaskula-Ranga V, Zack DJ (2016) grID: a CRISPR-Cas9 guide RNA database and resource for genome-editing. bioRxiv 097352Google Scholar
- Jia H, Wang N 2(014) Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. PloS one 9:e93806Google Scholar
- Khatodia S, Bhatotia K, Passricha N et al (2016) The CRISPR/Cas genome-editing tool: application in improvement of crops. Front Plant Sci 7: 506Google Scholar
- Liu H, Soyars C, Li J et al (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated resistance to cauliflower mosaic virus. Plant Direct 2(3):00047Google Scholar
- Varshney RK, Mir RR, Bhatia S et al (2014) Integrated physical. Genet J 10(8):913–924Google Scholar
- Wang F, Wang C, Liu P et al (2016) Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922. PloS one 11(4):0154027Google Scholar