Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic diversity of sweet corn inbreds using agro-morphological traits and microsatellite markers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
3 Biotech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of genetic diversity is a pre-requisite to broaden the genetic background of cultivated base of sweet corn, an endosperm mutant of field corn that alters starch biosynthesis pathway in endosperm. In the current investigation, genetic divergence among 39 inbred lines was assessed on the basis of 14 agro-morphological traits, two quality parameters and 63 microsatellite markers, selected on the basis of their association with QTLs affecting kernel quality. The cluster analysis based on unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages for agro-morphological and quality traits grouped the 39 inbreds into three clusters with 5, 14 and 20 genotypes, respectively. The unweighted neighbor-joining method for microsatellite markers also categorized the inbred lines into three major clusters grouping 10, 9 and 20 genotypes in cluster I, II and III, respectively. The two cluster distribution patterns showed approximately 36 percent similarity. The assay of 30 microsatellite repeats identified 82 alleles with allele size ranging from 80 to 400 bp. The major allele frequency and PIC value of the markers ranged from 0.42 to 0.79 and 0.27 to 0.63, respectively, which suggested the presence of high amount of polymorphism among the inbreds. The average heterozygosity was recorded to be 0.19 which signifies proper maintenance of inbred population. Principle co-ordinate analysis also depicted diverse nature of inbred lines and agreed well with the previously determined clustering pattern. This study has identified several inbreds, having good yield and high sugar content which will not only enhance the genetic background of sweet corn germplasm but will also lead to development of high-yielding hybrids with improved quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amorim EP, Almeida CCD, Sereno M, Bered F, Neto JFB (2003) Genetic variability in sweet corn using molecular markers. Maydica 48:177–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Babic M, Babic V, Prodanovic S, Filipovic M, Andjelkovic V (2012) Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic distances of maize inbreds. Genetika 44(1):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babic V, Srdic J, Pajic Z, Grcic N, Filipovic M (2014) The prediction of heterosis based on the phenotypic distance of sweet maize parental lines. Ratar Povrt 51(1):23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babic V, Nikolic A, Andjelkovic V, Kovacevic D, Filipovic M, Vasic V, Mladenovic-Drinic S (2016) AUPOV morphological versus molecular markers for maize inbred lines variability determination. Chilean J Agric Res 76(4):417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer CD, Shannon JC (1984) The use of endosperm genes for sweet corn improvement. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol 1. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 139–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary SB, Sharma HK, Kumar AA, Maruthi RT, Mitra J, Chowdhury I, Singh BK, Karmakar PG (2017) SSR and morphological trait based population structure analysis of 130 diverse flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) accessions. CR Biol 340:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creech RG (1965) Genetic control of carbohydrate synthesis in maize. Genetics 52:1175–1186

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dagla MC, Gadak RN, Kumar N, Ajay BC, Ram C (2014) A potential scope of sweet corn for peri-urban farmers in India. Popul Kheti 2:69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Photochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng ZL, Liu J, Fu FL, Li WC (2008) Molecular mechanism of sweet and waxy in maize. Int J Plant Breed Genet 2:93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes JT, Tracy WF (1994) Diversity of historically important sweet corn inbreds as estimated by RFLPs, morphology, isozymes, and pedigree. Crop Sci 34:26–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain F, Nepolean T, Vishwakarma AK, Pandey N, Prasanna BM, Gupta HS (2015) Mapping and validation of microsatellite markers linked to sugary1 and shrunken2 genes in maize (Zea mays L.). J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 24(2):135–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James MG, Robertson DS, Myers AM (1995) Characterization of the maize gene sugary1, a determinant of starch composition in kernels. Plant Cell 7:417–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jha S, Singh NK, Agrawal PK (2016) Complementation of sweet corn mutants: a method for grouping sweet corn genotypes. J Genet 95(1):183–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khanduri A, Hossain F, Lakhera PC, Prasanna BM (2011) Effect of harvest time on kernel sugar concentration in sweet corn. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 71:231–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Lertrat K, Pulam T (2007) Breeding for increased sweetness in sweet corn. Int J Plant Breed 1(1):27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu KJ, Muse SV (2005) Power marker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21:2128–2129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes AD, Scapim CA, Mangolin CA, Machado MFPS (2014) Genetic divergence among sweet corn lines estimated by microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Res 13(4):10415–10426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes AD, Scapim CA, da Silva Machado MFP, Mangolin CA, Silva TA, Cantagali LB, Teixeira FF, Mora F (2015) Genetic diversity assessed by microsatellite markers in sweet corn cultivars. Scientia Agricola 72(6):513–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazidf MS, Rafii MY, Hanafi MM, Rahim HA, Shabanimofrad M, Latif MA (2013) Agro-morphological characterization and assessment of variability, heritability, genetic advance and divergence in bacterial blight resistant rice genotypes. S Afr J Bot 86:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta B, Hossain F, Muthusamy V, Baveja A, Zunjare R, Jha SK, Gupta HS (2017) Microsatellite-based genetic diversity analyses of sugary1-, shrunken2- and double mutant- sweet corn inbreds for their utilization in breeding programme. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 23(2):411–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Monsoon Agro Bio Ltd (2017) Sweet corn exchange in India. http://www.cornclub.com. Accessed 9 Aug 2017

  • Pajic Z, Dukanovic L, Eric U (2004) Effects of endosperm mutants on maize seed germination. Genetika 36(3):265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey S, Ansari WA, Choudhary BR, Pandey M, Jena SN, Singh AK, Dubey RK, Singh B (2018) Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of hermaphrodite ridge gourd (Luffa hermaphrodita). 3 Biotech 8:17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park KJ, Sa KJ, Koh H, Lee JK (2013) QTL analysis for eating quality-related traits in an F2:3 population derived from waxy corn × sweet corn cross. Breed Sci 63:325–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F (2003) Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC (eds) Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Science Publishers Montpellier, Enfield, pp 43–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi X, Zhao Y, Jiang L, Cui Y, Wang Y, Liu B (2009) QTL analysis of kernel soluble sugar content in supersweet corn. Afr J Biotechnol 8(24):6913–6917

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp JV, Mangolin CA, Scapim CA, Machado MFPS (2009) Genetic structure and diversity among sweet corn (su1-germplasm) progenies using SSR markers. Maydica 54:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Seshu G, Rao MVB, Sudarshan MR (2015) Combining ability in diallel crosses of elite inbred lines of sweet corn (Zea mays L. saccharata). Green Farming 6(2):222–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KF, Martin I, Zeppa A (2012) Genetic effects and genetic relationships among shrunken (sh2) sweet corn lines and F1 hybrids. Euphytica 185:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srdic J, Nikolic A, Pajic Z, Drinic SM, Filipovic M (2011) Genetic similarity of sweet corn inbred lines in correlation with heterosis. Maydica 56(3):251–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy WF (1997) History, Genetics and Breeding of super sweet (shrunken2) sweet corn. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol 14. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 189–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy WF (2001) Sweet corn. In: Hallauer AR (ed) Specialty corns, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 155–197

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author is grateful to Banaras Hindu University for providing UGC Research Fellowship for pursuing Ph.D. Authors are thankful to All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Maize lead by Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana, for providing sweet corn inbred lines used in the study. The help of Dr. Rajkumar Zunjare, Division of Genetics, IARI, New Delhi, is duly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anima Mahato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest in the publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahato, A., Shahi, J.P., Singh, P.K. et al. Genetic diversity of sweet corn inbreds using agro-morphological traits and microsatellite markers. 3 Biotech 8, 332 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1353-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1353-5

Keywords

Navigation