Characterization of a novel thermotolerant NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase from hot climate plant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
- 67 Downloads
NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenases (FDH, EC 220.127.116.11), providing energy to the cell in methylotrophic microorganisms, are stress proteins in higher plants and the level of FDH expression increases under several abiotic and biotic stress conditions. They are biotechnologically important enzymes in NAD(P)H regeneration as well as CO2 reduction. Here, the truncated form of the Gossypium hirsutum fdh1 cDNA was cloned into pQE-2 vector, and overexpressed in Escherichia coli DH5α-T1 cells. Recombinant GhFDH1 was purified 26.3-fold with a yield of 87.3%. Optimum activity was observed at pH 7.0, when substrate is formate. Kinetic analyses suggest that GhFDH1 has considerably high affinity to formate (0.76 ± 0.07 mM) and NAD+ (0.06 ± 0.01 mM). At the same time, the affinity (1.98 ± 0.4 mM) and catalytic efficiency (0.0041) values of the enzyme for NADP+ show that GhFDH1 is a valuable enzyme for protein engineering studies that is trying to change the coenzyme preference from NAD to NADP which has a much higher cost than that of NAD. Improving the NADP specificity is important for NADPH regeneration which is an important coenzyme used in many biotechnological production processes. The Tm value of GhFDH1 is 53.3 °C and the highest enzyme activity is measured at 30 °C with a half-life of 61 h. Whilst further improvements are still required, the obtained results show that GhFDH1 is a promising enzyme for NAD(P)H regeneration for its prominent thermostability and NADP+ specificity.
KeywordsCoenzyme regeneration Gossypium hirsutum Formate dehydrogenase NADP+ specificity Thermostability
This work was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK), Project No. 216Z052.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest in the publication.
- Alekseeva AA, Savin SS, Tishkov VI (2011) NAD + -dependent formate dehydrogenase from plants. Acta Naturae 3:38–54Google Scholar
- Alekseeva AA, Fedorchuk VV, Zarubina SA, Sadykhov EG, Matorin AD, Savin SS, Tishkov VI (2015) The role of Ala198 in the stability and coenzyme specificity of bacterial formate dehydrogenases. Acta Naturae 7:60–69Google Scholar
- Altaş N, Aslan AS, Karataş E, Chronopoulou E, Labrou NE, Binay B (2017) Heterologous production of extreme alkaline thermostable NAD + -dependent formate dehydrogenase with wide-range pH activity from Myceliophthora thermophila. Process Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.06.017 Google Scholar
- Choe H, Joo JC, Cho DH, Kim MH, Lee SH, Jung KD, Kim YH, Yong HK (2014) Efficient CO2-reducing activity of NAD-dependent formate dehydrogenase from Thiobacillus sp. KNK65MA for formate production from CO2 Gas. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103111
- David P, des Francs-Small CC, Sévignac M. Thareau V, Macadré C, Langin T, Geffroy V (2010) Three highly similar formate dehydrogenase genes located in the vicinity of the B4 resistance gene cluster are differentially expressed under biotic and abiotic stresses in Phaseolus vulgaris. Theor Appl Genet. 121: 87–103Google Scholar
- Tishkov VI, Uglanova SV, Fedorchuk VV, Savin SS (2010) Influence of ıon strength and pH on thermal stability of yeast formate dehydrogenase. Acta Naturae 2:82–88Google Scholar