Materials
Fungal culture media (yeast extract glucose agar and potato dextrose agar), birch wood xylan, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), p-nitrophenyl–β-D-glucopyranoside, and standard sugars (HPLC-grade) were purchased from HiMedia laboratories Ltd, Mumbai, India. Veratryl alcohol was purchased from Sigma Aldrich Co, USA. 2, 2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) was purchased from MP Biomedicals, USA. All other laboratory reagents were purchased from SD-Fine chemicals Ltd, Mumbai, India.
Fungal strains
The fungal strains were selected on the basis of their high lignolytic activity and lignin degradation ability reported in the literature (Arora et al. 2002; Shi et al. 2012). WRF strains Daedalea flavida NCIM 1087 (DF-1) and Phanerochaete chrysosporium NCIM 1106 (PC) were procured from National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms (NCIM), Pune, India. Daedalea flavida MTCC 145 (DF-2) and Trametes hirsuta MTCC 136 (TH) were procured from microbial-type culture collection (MTCC), Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. DF-1 and PC were grown and maintained in potato dextrose agar medium (potato infusion 20%, dextrose 2%, and agar 1.5% w/v) in petri plates at pH 6, 28 °C. DF-2 and TH were grown and maintained in yeast extract glucose agar medium (yeast extracts 0.5%, glucose 1%, and agar 1.5% w/v) in petri plates at pH 5.8, 25 °C. Strains were sub-cultured after regular period of 15 days.
Lignocellulolytic ability
The lignolytic ability (ability to degrade lignin by the action of lignolytic enzymes), laccase, and peroxidase activity of WRF were tested using tannic acid (0.1% w/v) (Ander and Eriksson 1977), guaiacol (50 mM) (Hankin and Anagnostakis 1975), and pyrogallol (1% w/v) along with hydrogen peroxide (0.4% v/v) (Egger 1986), respectively, in petri plate cultures. Fungal cultures were grown in their respective agar medium, wells of diameter 8 mm were bored using sterile cork borer in full grown petri plate cultures, and bottom of the wells was sealed with molten agar. Tannic acid 0.5 mL (0.1% w/v), guaiacol 0.5 mL (50 mM), and pyrogallol 0.2 mL (1% w/v) with hydrogen peroxide 0.2 mL (0.4% v/v) were added into the wells. Petri plates were incubated in dark at 28 °C, 15 h for formation of characteristic colored zones of brown, dark red to purple, and golden yellow to brown around the wells because of lignolytic ability, laccase, and peroxidase activity, respectively. The diameters (in mm) of colored zones around the wells were measured as the lignolytic ability, laccase, and peroxidase activity of fungal strains.
Congo red dye test was performed to test the cellulolytic ability of WRF using CMC (10.0 g/L) as sole carbon source (Teather and Wood 1982). The culture plates were flooded with Congo red dye solution (1 mg/L), dye was drained off after 15 min, and the plates were washed three times with NaCl solution (1.0 M). The diameters (in mm) of yellow/halo zones formed along the fungal growth were measured as the cellulolytic ability of fungal strains.
Solid-state fermentation (SSF) and determination of selectivity value
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) stalks were collected from the Bathinda region of Punjab, India. Cotton stalks were dried at 40 °C (4% moisture content) in oven, chopped, screened to particle size 1–10 mm, and stored in air-tight containers. The inocula for pretreatment of cotton stalks by SSF were prepared in the liquid culture. Strains were grown by inoculating five culture disks (1 cm diameter each) from the plate into 50 mL liquid medium in 250 mL Erlenmeyer’s flask, incubated (Innova 42R, New Brunswick, USA), and grown stationary at 28 °C, 5 days. Fungal strains were blended aseptically using blender (2000 rpm, 20 s, three times), diluted with sterile medium to obtain dry cell weight (DCW) 1.0 mg/mL, and used as inocula. The fungal biomass DCW concentration in liquid culture was calculated after separation of biomass and taking dry weight. Fungal biomass was separated from liquid culture by centrifugation (4018R, Eppendroff Ltd, USA) at 5000 rpm, 28 °C for 15 min, washed three times with double distilled water, and dried in oven at 40 °C until the constant weight.
Five gram cotton stalks (dried, chopped, and screened to 1–10 mm) were taken in 250 mL Erlenmeyer’s flasks and 15 mL distilled water that were added to maintain 75% moisture content in biomass. Flasks were cotton plugged and autoclaved at 121 °C and 15 psi for 30 min. Flasks containing autoclaved cotton stalks were inoculated with 1 mL inocula (1 mg/mL fungal DCW) equivalent to 0.2 mg fungal DCW per gram cotton stalks and incubated at 28 °C in static condition for 40 days. Samples were withdrawn at 5 day intervals, and SV was calculated by taking ratio of lignin degradation to the cellulose loss. All tests were done in triplicate. Fungal strain having high lignolytic enzyme activities and high SV was selected to study the effect of particle size, moisture content, supplementation on delignification, and enzymatic hydrolysis of cotton stalks.
Cotton stalks preparation
Cotton stalks were dried, chopped, screened to particle sizes of 1, 5, and 10 mm and stored in air-tight containers for its use in study of the effect of particle size on lignocellulolytic enzyme production, lignin degradation, SV, and enzymatic hydrolysis. The cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin content of cotton stalks were found to be 37.68, 12.45, and 30.16% (w/w), respectively.
Pretreatment in solid-state fermentation
Five gram samples of ground cotton stalks for each of the three different particle sizes (1, 5, and 10 mm) were taken in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer’s flask, and different volumes of sodium acetate buffer (20 mM, pH 4.5) were added to maintain moisture content (%w/w) 45, 65, 75, and 85. All flasks were cotton plugged and autoclaved at 121 °C and 15 psi for 30 min. One mL each inocula was added to the flasks. The flasks were incubated at 28 °C in incubator shaker (New Brunswick-INNOVA 42), and samples were withdrawn after the regular interval of 5 days for biomass composition analysis, enzymatic assays, and enzymatic hydrolysis study. To study the effect of supplements on cotton stalks degradation, different concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2 mM) of CuSO4·7H2O, MnSO4·5H2O, gallic acid, and veratryl alcohol per gram of cotton stalks were supplemented in pretreatment flasks.
Estimation of enzyme activities
After pretreatment by SSF, cotton stalks with fungal biomass growth in 250 mL flask were suspended in 50 mL of sodium acetate buffer (20 mM, pH 4.5) and extracellular enzymes were extracted using shaker-incubator at 150 rpm and 28 °C for 4 h. The enzyme extracts were filtered using vacuum filtration assembly fitted with nylon membrane (pore size 0.22 µm) and stored at −20 °C.
Laccase activity was estimated using 2, 2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) as substrate (Bourbonnais and Paice 1990). Lignin peroxidase activity was estimated by oxidation of veratryl alcohol to verataldehyde in the presence of H2O2 (Kirk et al. 1986). MnP activity was estimated by the oxidation of phenol red in the presence of H2O2 (Glenn and Gold 1983). One unit of laccase, LiP, and MnP enzyme activities were defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 μmol of substrate per min. Carboxymethyl cellulase activity (CMCase/endo-β-1-4-glucanase), filter paper activity (FPase), and xylanase activities were estimated based on dinitrosalicylic acid (DNSA) method (Miller 1959). CMCase and FPase activities were estimated using CMC and Whatman’s no. 1 filter paper as substrate, respectively (Ghose 1987). Xylanase activity was estimated using birchwood xylan as substrate (Bailey et al. 1992). One unit of CMCase, FPase, and xylanase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 μmol of reducing sugar per min. β-glucosidase activity was estimated using p-nitrophenyl- β-D glucopyranoside as substrate and change in absorbance at 405 nm (Parry et al. 2001). One unit of β-glucosidase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 µmol of paranitrophenol (pNP) per min. Activities of the enzymes in extract were estimated as IU/mL, and total units of enzymes in the flask were calculated by multiplying the enzyme activity with the volume of buffer added. The activities of the enzyme during pretreatment by SSF were expressed as IU/g solid of untreated cotton stalks.
Compositional analysis of cotton stalks biomass
Structural carbohydrates (cellulose and hemicellulose) and lignin content in untreated and pretreated cotton stalks were analyzed by the method described in NREL/TP-510-42618 (Sluiter et al. 2011) with some modifications. 0.30 g of biomass samples each was subjected to two-step acid hydrolysis. In the first step, 72% sulphuric acid at 30 °C for 1 h was used. Sample was diluted immediately to 4% of sulphuric acid and autoclaved for 1 h. The solution was filtered using vacuum filtration system fitted with nylon membrane (pore 0.2 µm). The resulting solid residue was washed three times with distilled water, dried (50 °C) to constant weight, and reported as acid-insoluble lignin. The hydrolysis liquor was neutralized by the addition of calcium carbonate and filtered, and sugars in aqueous phase were analyzed by HPLC (Agilent 1200 series, USA) equipped with Agilent Hi-Plex H column and refractive index detector (RID). Sulphuric acid (5 mM) at 0.6 mL/min was used as mobile phase. The temperatures of column and RID detector were maintained at 60 and 55 °C, respectively. Cellulose content was estimated from the glucose concentration using correction factor of 0.9, while hemicellulose content was calculated from xylose, arabinose, mannose, and galactose concentration using correction factor 0.88 for xylose and arabinose and 0.9 for mannose and galactose. Acid soluble lignin was determined by taking absorbance of acid hydrolysis liquor at 205 nm (ε = 110 L/g/cm) using UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Kinetic, Eppendorf Ltd). Ash content of cotton stalk biomass was determined by burning 500 mg of sample in muffle furnace (MFHT-28DXSA, Macro scientific works pvt. Ltd, India) at 575 °C and 3 h to ash, as described in method NREL/TP-510-42622 (Sluiter et al. 2008).
Enzymatic hydrolysis
Hydrolysis of pretreated and untreated cotton stalks was carried out using commercial cellulase enzymes SaccariSEB EG and SaccariSEB BG obtained as gift from advanced enzymes, Mumbai, India. The endoglucanase activity (using CMC as substrate) of enzyme saccariSEB EG and β-glucosidase activity (using p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside as substrate) of enzyme SacchariSEB BG were estimated to be 27.5 and 21.8 IU/mL, respectively. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cotton stalks was carried out by method NREL/TP-5100-63351 (Resch et al. 2015) with some modifications. Enzymes SaccariSEB EG 14 IU/g solid and SaccariSEB BG 11 IU/g solid were loaded to 100 mg of cotton stalks biomass in 10 mL citrate phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 4.8) in 50 mL falcon tube. 350 μL sodium azide (5% w/v) was added to prevent the microbial growth. The reaction mixture in falcon tubes was incubated in incubator shaker at 150 rpm and 50 °C for 120 h. 1 mL reaction samples were taken at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h, and reactions were stopped by heating the sample vials in water bath at 100 °C and 15 min. The samples were filtered by syringe membrane filters (0.2 µm), and glucose concentrations were estimated by HPLC. The glucose yields were calculated as the milligrams of glucose released per gram of the cotton stalk biomass.
Characterization of cotton stalks
The morphology of cotton stalks was examined by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (JSM-6510LV, JEOL, Japan) after sputter coating the dried samples with thin film of gold at accelerating voltage 15 kV and magnification 1000×. The crystallinity of cellulose was examined by X-ray diffractometer (X’PERT PRO MPD, Panalytical, Netherland) equipped with sealed tube having Cu Kα radiation source (λ = 0.15406 nm) and fixed divergent slit size of 1°. Samples were scanned on a rotating stage between 5° to 50° 2θ at step size 0.001° 2θ and time per step 20 s. The percentage crystallinity (% Cr) and crystallinity index (C.I.) were calculated from the relations (Segal et al. 1959; Kaith et al. 2009):
$$ {\text{\% Cr}}\; = \;\varvec{I}_{22} /(\varvec{I}_{22} + \varvec{I}_{18} )\; \times \;100 $$
$${\text{C}} . {\text{I}}.\; = \;\left( {I_{22} \; - \;I_{18} } \right)/I_{22}$$
where I
22 was the intensity of crystalline peak of cellulose at 2θ = 22° and I
18 was intensity of amorphous cellulose in cotton stalks at 2θ = 18°.