Abstract
The effect of ultrasonic radiation in the cavitational and non-cavitational modes on the properties of wood activated carbon (AC) has been investigated. The AC was synthesized from birch wood by pyrolysis at 800 ºC and activation by water vapor. The duration of the ultrasonic treatment was chosen so that the AC received the same amount of acoustic energy. It has been shown that ultrasonic treatment in the cavitational mode does not cause significant changes in the porous structure of wood activated carbon, with only the redistribution of mesopores in size taking place. The non-cavitational ultrasonic treatment not only redistributes the mesopores in size, but also forms a microporous structure of the AC. Taken together, these factors lead to an increase in the specific surface area to 719 m2/g as against 551 m2/g for the original carbon. It was found that the specific capacity of the AC after ultrasonic exposure increased to 94.8 F/g for carbon after non-cavitational treatment and 142.3 F/g for carbon after cavitational treatment as against 58.3 F/g for the original carbon. The impedance dependences at different bias voltages for supercapacitors made from both the original and treated AC were analyzed. Equivalent electrical circuits modeling impedance hodographs were constructed. To this end, the de Levie model was employed, modified by the connection of a parallel RSCCSC-link. It was established that due to the ultrasonic treatment of carbon in the cavitational mode, the density of energy states of delocalized charge carriers at the Fermi level increases, which results in the redistribution of capacitances that form an electrical double layer, and this increases the specific capacity of carbon. The increase in the specific capacity of AC after ultrasonic treatment in the non-cavitational mode is primarily attributed to the formation of a microporous structure and, consequently, an increase in the specific surface area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abioye AM, Ani FN (2015) Recent development in the production of activated carbon electrodes from agricultural waste biomass for supercapacitors: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:1282–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.129
Balaban O, Venhryn B, Grygorchak I, Mudry S, Kulyk Y, Rachiy B, Lisovskiy R (2014) Size Effects at ultrasonic treatment of nanoporous carbon and improved characteristics of supercapacitors on its base. Nanosyst Nanomater Nanotechnol 12(2):225–238
Bordun I, Chabecki P, Malovanyy M, Pieshkov T, Chwastek K (2020) Changes in the electrical charge accumulation ability of nanoporous activated carbon under ultrasonic radiation exposure. Isr J Chem 60:615–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201900157
Bordun I, Sadova M, Borysiuk A, Kulyk Yu (2017) Investigation of the structure of activated carbon from plant material by means of X-ray diffractometry and small-angle scattering. Nanosistemi Nanomateriali Nanotehnologii 15:517–533. https://doi.org/10.15407/nnn.15.03.0517
Conway B (1999) Electrochemical supercapacitors. Kluwer Academic, New York
Doosti M, Kargar R, Sayadi M (2012) Water treatment using ultrasonic assistance: a review. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci 2(3):96. https://doi.org/10.0000/issn-2220-8860-piaees-2012-v2-0011
Fu Y, Ding X, Zhao J, Zheng Z (2019) Study on the effect of oxidation-ultrasound treatment on the electrochemical properties of activated carbon materials. Ultrason Sonochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.10492.
Gerischer H, Mcintyer R, Scherson D, Storck W (1987) Density of the electronic states of graphite: de rivation from differential capacitance measurements. J Phys Chem 91:1930
Goncharuk V, Malyarenko V, Yaremenko V (2004) The mechanism of the effect of ultrasound on aqueous system. J Water Chem Technol 26(3):34–41
Goncharuk V, Malyarenko V, Yaremenko V (2008) Use of ultrasound in water treatment. J Water Chem Technol 30(3):137–150. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063455X08030028
Greil P, Lifka T, Kaindl A (1998) Biomorphic cellular silicon carbide ceramics from wood: I. Processing and microstructure. J Eur Ceram Soc 18(14):1961–1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00156-3
Gryglewicz G, Machnikowski J, Lorenc-Grabowska E, Lota G, Frackowiak E (2005) Effect of pore size distribution of coal-based activated carbons on double layer capacitance. Electrochim Acta 50:1197
Hoinkis E (1997) Small-angle scattering of neutrons and X-rays from carbons and graphites. In: Chemistry & physics of carbon, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Kercher A, Nagle D (2003) Microstructural evolution during charcoal carbonization by X-ray diffraction analysis. Carbon 41(1):15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00261-0
Kobus Z, Kusińska E (2008) Influence of physical properties of liquid on acoustic power of ultrasonic processor. TEKA Kom Mot Energ Roln 8a:71–78
Lozano-Castelló D, Marco-Lozar J, Bleda-Martínez M, Montilla F, Morallón E, Linares-Solano A, Cazorla-Amoros D (2013) Relevance of porosity and surface chemistry of superactivated carbons in capacitors. TANSO 256:41–47. https://doi.org/10.7209/tanso.2013.41
Luo X, Chen S, Hu T, Chen Y, Li F (2021) Renewable biomass-derived carbons for electrochemical capacitor applications. Sus Mat 1:211–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sus2.8
Margulis M (1995) Sonochemistry and cavitation. Gordon and Breach Publishers, London
Margulis M (2004) Sonochemistry as a new promising area of high energy chemistry. High Energy Chem 38(3):135–142. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIEC.0000027648.69725.98
Beckett M, Hua I (2001) Impact of ultrasonic frequency on aqueous sonoluminescence and sonochemistry. J Phys Chem A 105(15):3796–3802. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp003226x
Navarro G, Torres J, Blanco M, Nájera J, Santos-Herran M, Lafoz M (2021) Present and future of supercapacitor technology applied to powertrains, renewable generation and grid connection applications. Energies 14:3060. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113060
Ostafiychuk B, Budzulyak I, Merena R, Rachiy B, Magometa O (2008) The effect of chemical treatment on properties of activated carbon materials. Phys Chem Solid State 9(3):609–612. https://doi.org/10.12691/nnr-1-2-3
Patil P, Venkateshwarlu K, Pate M (2015) Application of supercapacitor energy storage in microgrid system. Int J Sci Eng Technol Res 4(3):589–594
Plebankiewicz I, Przybył W (2022) Solar energy storage—solution based on commercial silicon solar cells and supercapacitors. Przegład Elektrotechniczny 1:139–142. https://doi.org/10.15199/48.2022.01.28
Ptashnyk V, Bordun I, Malovanyy CP, Pieshkov T (2020) The change of structural parameters of nanoporous activated carbons under the influence of ultrasonic radiation. Appl Nanosci 10:4891–4899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-020-01393-z
Ptashnyk V, Bordun I, Pohrebennyk V, Takosoglu J, Sadova M (2018) Impedance investigation of activated carbon material modified by ultrasound treatment. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny 5:186–189. https://doi.org/10.15199/48.2018.05.33
Rawat S, Mishra RK, Bhaskar T (2022) Biomass derived functional carbon materials for supercapacitor applications. Chemosphere 286(Part 3):131961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131961
Regisser F, Lavoie MA, Champagne G, Belanger D (1996) Randomly oriented graphite electrode. Part 1. Effect of electrochemical pretreatment on the electrochemical behaviour and chemical composition of the electrode. J Electroanal Chem 415(1–2):47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(96)04636-0
Rouquerol J, Rouquerol F, Llewellyn P, Maurin G, Sing K (2014) Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford
Sahin M, Blaabjerg F, Sangwongwanich A (2022) A comprehensive review on supercapacitor applications and developments. Energies 15(3):674. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030674
Serpone N, Terzian R, Hidaka H, Pelizetti E (1994) Ultrasonic induced dehalogenation and oxidation of 2-, 3-, and 4-chlorophenol in air-equilibrated aqueous media. Similarities with irradiated semiconductor particulates. J Phys Chem 98:2634–2640. https://doi.org/10.1021/J100061A021
Shestakov S, Babak V (2012) Mathematical model of the spatial distributing of density of erosive power of multibubble cavitation. Appl Phys Res 4:64–77. https://doi.org/10.5539/apr.v4n1p64
Shvets R, Grygorchak I, Borysyuk A, Shvachko S, Kondyr A, Baluk V, Kurepa A, Rachiy B (2014) New nanoporous biocarbons with iron and silicon impurities: synthesis, properties, and application to supercapacitors. Phys Solid State 56:2021–2027. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783414100266
Stoynov Z, Grafov B, Savvova-Stoynova B, Elkin V (1991) Electrochemical impedans. Nauka, Moscow
Tan X, Liu S, Liu Y, Gu Y, Zeng G, Hu X, Wang X, Liu S, Jiang L (2017) Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage. Biores Technol 227:359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.083
Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark A, Rodriguez-Reinoso J, Rouquerol J, Sing K (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
Vinodgopal K, Kamat P (1998) Environmental applications of ionizing radiation. Wiley, New York
Weavers L, Ling F, Hoffmann M (1998) Aromatic compound degradation in water using a combination of sonolysis and ozonolysis. Environ Sci Technol 32(18):2727–2728
Xie W, Li R, Lu X (2015) Pulsed ultrasound assisted dehydration of waste oil. Ultrason Sonochem 26:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.03.004
Zhang L, Hu X, Wang Z, Sun F, Dorrell D (2018a) A review of supercapacitor modeling, estimation, and applications: a control/management perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:1868–1878
Zhang Y, Ruiqing L, Xiaoqian L, Yilong Y, Pinghu C, Fang D, Ripeng J (2018b) Possible effects and mechanisms of ultrasonic cavitation on oxide inclusions during direct-chill casting of an Al alloy. Metals 8:814. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8100814
Zhang Z, Liu X, Li D, Lei Y, Gao T, Wu B, Zhao J, Wang Y, Zhou C, Yao H (2019) Mechanism of ultrasonic impregnation on porosity of activated carbons in non-cavitation and cavitation regimes. Ultrason Sonochem 51:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.10.024
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ptashnyk, V., Bordun, I., Maksymych, V. et al. Influence of cavitational and non-cavitational ultrasonic treatment on the structure and electrochemical properties of nanoporous wood activated carbon. Appl Nanosci 13, 7303–7313 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-023-02896-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-023-02896-1