Abstract
The main aim of the present study was the investigation of the viability of two probiotics bacteria of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum in different environments including simulated gastrointestinal and circumstances namely yogurt. For coating of strains, the double-coating technique was used as the first coating was alginate chitosan and second was Eudragit S100 and the results compared with free-coating cells. the number of free L. acidophilus and L. plantarum were 6.4 × 107 ± 3.3 × 104 and 7.5 × 107 ± 3.5 × 10, respectively, and after 32 days in the last measurement, a sharp decrease in the numbers was observed as they reached to 4.6 × 104 ± 0.9 × 102 and 1.5 × 102 ± 7.9 × 101, respectively. In double-coated condition more number of strains survived as L. acidophilus and L. plantarum were 6.8 × 107 ± 1.8 × 105 and 7.3 × 107 ± 2.8 × 105 at the first measurement, respectively, and at the end of counting the numbers were 5.7 × 105 ± 8.8 × 102 and 9.8 × 104 ± 8.8 × 101. The evaluation of the viability in a wide range of pH shows that two strains survive more in both free and double-coated form, however, L. acidophilus performed better. The results indicating that microencapsulation play as a protective role and strains survive longer than free-coating cells. This method is effective in increasing the viability of beneficial bacteria, so it can bring many benefits to the human body.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GI:
-
Gastrointestinal
- Eu:
-
Eudragit
- SAS:
-
Supercritical antisolvent technique
- PDI:
-
Polydispersity index
- CFU:
-
Colony forming units
References
Abouhussein DM, El-bary AA, Shalaby SH, El Nabarawi MA (2016) Chitosan mucoadhesive buccal films: effect of different casting solvents on their physicochemical properties. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 8(9):206–213. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijpps.2016.v8i9.12999
Ahmed TA, Aljaeid BM (2016) Preparation, characterization, and potential application of chitosan, chitosan derivatives, and chitosan metal nanoparticles in pharmaceutical drug delivery. Drug Des Devel Ther 10:483. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S99651.eCollection2016
Alvarez-Calatayud G, Margolles A (2016) Dual-coated lactic acid bacteria: an emerging innovative technology in the field of probiotics. Future Microbiol 11(3):467–475
Anal AK, Singh H (2007) Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends Food Sci Technol 18(5):240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.004
Badhana S, Garud N, Garud A (2013) Colon specific drug delivery of mesalamine using Eudragit S100- coated chitosan microspheres for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Int Curr Pharm J 2(3):42–48. https://doi.org/10.3329/icpj.v2i3.13577
Bernet M-F, Brassart D, Neeser J, Servin A (1994) Lactobacillus acidophilus LA 1 binds to cultured human intestinal cell lines and inhibits cell attachment and cell invasion by enterovirulent bacteria. Gut 35(4):483–489. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.35.4.483
Chávarri M, Marañón I, Ares R, Ibáñez FC, Marzo F, del Carmen Villarán M (2010) Microencapsulation of a probiotic and prebiotic in alginate-chitosan capsules improves survival in simulated gastro-intestinal conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 142(1):185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.06.022
Crcarevska MS, Dodov MG, Goracinova K (2008) Chitosan coated Ca–alginate microparticles loaded with budesonide for delivery to the inflamed colonic mucosa. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 68(3):565–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.06.007
Frederico C, Pinto TB, Castro EM, Suguimoto HH, De Santana EHW, Alegro LCA, De Souza CHB (2016) Probiotic dairy dessert supplemented with whey protein concentrate: effect on the viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus, on texture, physicochemical and sensory features. J Food Nutr Res 55(1):48–56. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5297.4
Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB (1995) Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr 125(6):1401–1412
Granato D, Branco GF, Cruz AG, Faria JdAF, Shah NP (2010) Probiotic dairy products as functional foods. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9(5):455–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00120.x
Hari BV, Lu C-L, Narayanan N, Wang R-R, Zheng Y-T (2016) Engineered polymeric nanoparticles of Efavirenz: dissolution enhancement through particle size reduction. Chem Eng Sci 155:366–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.08.019
Higashi K, Hayashi H, Yamamoto K, Moribe K (2015) The effect of drug and EUDRAGIT® S 100 miscibility in solid dispersions on the drug and polymer dissolution rate. Int J Pharm 494:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.08.007
Hu D, Liu L, Chen W, Li S, Zhao Y (2013) A novel preparation method for 5-aminosalicylic acid loaded Eudragit S100 nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci 13(5):6454–6468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13056454
Huang C-H, Shen C-C, Liang Y-C, Jan T-R (2016) The probiotic activity of Lactobacillus murinus against food allergy. J Funct Foods 25:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2016.06.006
Kandasamy S, Vlasova AN, Fischer D, Kumar A, Chattha KS, Rauf A, Saif LJ (2016) Differential effects of Escherichia coli Nissle and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG on human rotavirus binding, infection, and B cell immunity. J Immunol 196(4):1780–1789. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1501705
Kanmani P, Kumar RS, Yuvaraj N, Paari K, Pattukumar V, Arul V (2011) Cryopreservation and microencapsulation of a probiotic in alginate-chitosan capsules improves survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 16(6):1106–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-011-0068-9
Krasaekoopt W, Watcharapoka S (2014) Effect of addition of inulin and galactooligosaccharide on the survival of microencapsulated probiotics in alginate beads coated with chitosan in simulated digestive system, yogurt and fruit juice. LWT-Food Sci Technol 57(2):761–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.01
Krasaekoopt W, Bhandari B, Deeth H (2003) Evaluation of encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yoghurt. Int Dairy J 13(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(02)00155-3
Krasaekoopt W, Bhandari B, Deeth H (2004) The influence of coating materials on some properties of alginate beads and survivability of microencapsulated probiotic bacteria. Int Dairy J 14(8):737–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.01.004
Lee J, Cha D, Park HJ (2004) Survival of freeze-dried Lactobacillus bulgaricus KFRI 673 in chitosancoated calcium alginate microparticles. J Agric Food Chem 52(24):7300–7305. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf040235k
Liserre AM, Re MI, Franco BD (2007) Microencapsulation of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis in modified alginate chitosan beads and evaluation of survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Food Biotechnol 21(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905430701191064
Rahmati F (2017) Characterization of Lactobacillus, Bacillus and Saccharomyces isolated from Iranian traditional dairy products for potential sources of starter cultures. AIMS Microbiol 3:815–825. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.815
Rahmati F (2018a) Identification and characterization of Lactococcus starter strains in milk-based traditional fermented products in the region of Iran. AIMS Agric Food 3(1):12–25. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2018.1.12
Rahmati F (2018b) Iran, the potential source of dairy starter microorganisms: Isolation, identification and characterization of LAB and yeast starter strain from traditional dairy products of Lorestan province. GRIN Verlag, Munich, pp 74–78
Rahmati F (2019) Impact of microencapsulation on two probiotic strains in alginate chitosan and Eudragit S100 under gastrointestinal and normal conditions. Open Biotechnol J 13(1):59–67
Ranadheera CS, Evans C, Adams M, Baines S (2012) Probiotic viability and physico-chemical and sensory properties of plain and stirred fruit yogurts made from goat’s milk. Food Chem 135(3):1411–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.025
Rijkers GT, Bengmark S, Enck P, Haller D, Herz U, Kalliomaki M, Myllyluoma E (2010) Guidance for substantiating the evidence for beneficial effects of probiotics: current status and recommendations for future research. J Nutr 140(3):671S–676S. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.113779
Rocha JMF (2016) Microencapsulation of probiotic bacteria. EC. Microbiology 3(4):480–481
Shima M, Morita Y, Yamashita M, Adachi S (2006) Protection of Lactobacillus acidophilus from the low pH of a model gastric juice by incorporation in a W/O/W emulsion. Food Hydrocoll 20(8):1164–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.01.001
Sultana K, Godward G, Reynolds N, Arumugaswamy R, Peiris P, Kailasapathy K (2000) Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria with alginate–starch and evaluation of survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt. Int J Food Microbiol 62(1):47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00380-9
Thakral S, Thakral NK, Majumdar DK (2013) Eudragit®: a technology evaluation. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 10(1):131–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.10.032
Yoo J-W, Giri N, Lee CH (2011) pH-sensitive Eudragit nanoparticles for mucosal drug delivery. Int J Pharm 403(1):262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.10.032
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to appreciate from all those who helped us in this research. All fees are provided by the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest and financial expenses covered by the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rahmati, F. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum in Eudragit S100 and alginate chitosan under gastrointestinal and normal conditions. Appl Nanosci 10, 391–399 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-019-01174-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-019-01174-3