Surface reactivity of nanoporous carbons: preparation and physicochemical characterization of sulfonated activated carbon fibers

  • Liudmyla M. Grishchenko
  • Vitaliy E. Diyuk
  • Ruslan T. Mariychuk
  • Anna V. Vakaliuk
  • Valentina Z. Radkevich
  • Siarhei G. Khaminets
  • Oleksandr V. Mischanchuk
  • Vladyslav V. LisnyakEmail author
Original Article


Here, we have examined the nanoporous activated carbon fibers (ACFs) sulfonated using the direct sulfonation and the staged method that included bromination, followed by sulfidation and oxidation. TEM confirmed the nanoporous structure of the prepared sulfonated ACFs. Nitrogen porometry and 2D nonlocal DFT simulations showed the nanoporosity reduction and variations of the pore size distribution because of the functionalization. Comparison of parameters of the SO3H groups confined in nanopores, e.g., the thermal stability and catalytic potential, showed that the most efficient acid sites, in the catalytic 2-propanol dehydration to propylene, are the SO3H groups grafted by the staged Houben–Weil methods. From the productivity of reactions used at the preparation stage, and in contrast to the one-staged aromatic substitution, the bromine addition to π sites of the edges of carbon matrix supplies enough active sites and is a reason for further high yields of the grafted thermostable SO3H groups. Hydrolysis of the grafted bromine and the surface oxidation of nanopores walls are parallel reactions that lowered the SO3H-related acidity, increasing the total acidity to 1.5 mmol g−1. The reported nanoporous sulfonated ACFs are effective to be used in the dehydration reactions catalyzed by solid acids.


Nanoporous activated carbon fibers Sulfonation Thermal analysis Carbon solid acids Molecular approaches 



This work was supported in a part by an educational program of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “100 + 100 + 100”, according to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine regulations No 411 of 13.04.2011 and No 546 of 16.05.2011, which is gratefully acknowledged by L.M.G. The authors (L.M.G., V.E.D., A.V.V., and V.V.L.) thank the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine for the financial support under the State budget programs [0111U006260] and [0114U003554]. One of the authors, V.V.L. acknowledges a partial financial support from the National Scholarship Program of Slovak Republic, Slovak Academic International Agency scholarships, ID numbers: [14511] and [20917], and the International Visegrad Fund for the scholarship, ID number [51810574] in 2018. V.V.L. and R.T.M. thankful for a partial support from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the project “University Science Park TECHNICOM for innovation applications supported by knowledge technology”, ITMS: 26220220182, Operational Programme ‘Research and Development’.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13204_2019_1069_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)


  1. Adhikari S, Hood Z, Gallego N, Contescu C (2018) Lignin-derived carbon fibers as efficient heterogeneous solid acid catalysts for esterification of oleic acid. MRS Adv 3:2865–2873. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aykut Y, Khan SA (2016) Activated carbon nanofibers. Chapter 12. In: Sattler KD (ed) Nanoparticles, nanocapsules, nanofibers, nanoporous structures, and nanocomposites, vol II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 267–287. Google Scholar
  3. Barroso-Bogeat A, Alexandre-Franco M, Fernández-González C, Gómez-Serrano V (2014) FT-ir analysis of pyrone and chromene structures in activated carbon. Energy Fuels 28:4096–4103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barroso-Bogeat A, Alexandre-Franco M, Fernández-González C, Gómez-Serrano V (2015) Preparation of activated carbon-metal (hydr) oxide materials by thermal methods. Thermogravimetric-mass spectrometric (TG-MS) analysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 116:243–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezugla TM, Grishchenko LM, Vakaliuk AV et al (2018) Covalent bonding of sulfogroups to activated carbon fibers: the role of bromine plasma pretreatment. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 661:58–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cazorla-Amoros D (2014) Grand challenges in carbon-based materials research. Front Mater 1:6. Google Scholar
  7. Cremlyn RJW (2002) Chlorosulfonic acid: a versatile reagent. RSC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawodu FA, Ayodele OO, Xin J, Zhang S (2014) Application of solid acid catalyst derived from low value biomass for a cheaper biodiesel production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:1898–1909. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diyuk VE, Zaderko AN, Grishchenko LM, Yatsymyrskiy AV, Lisnyak VV (2012) Efficient carbon-based acid catalysts for the propan-2-ol dehydration. Catal Commun 27:33–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diyuk VE, Zaderko AN, Veselovska KI, Lisnyak VV (2015) Functionalization of surface of carbon materials with bromine vapors at mediate high temperature: a thermogravimetric study. J Therm Anal Calorim 120:1665–1678. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diyuk VE, Mariychuk RT, Lisnyak VV (2016a) Barothermal preparation and characterization of micro-mesoporous activated carbons. Textural studies, thermal destruction and evolved gas analysis with TG-TPD-IR technique. J Therm Anal Calorim 124:1119–1130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diyuk VE, Mariychuk RT, Lisnyak VV (2016b) Functionalization of activated carbon surface with sulfonated styrene as a facile route for solid acids preparation. Mater Chem Phys 184:138–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Figueiredo JL (2013) Functionalization of porous carbons for catalytic applications. J Mater Chem A 1:9351–9364. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR, Freitas MMA, Orfao JJM (1999) Modification of the surface chemistry of activated carbons. Carbon 37:1379–1389. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao Z, Tang S, Cui X et al (2015) Efficient mesoporous carbon-based solid catalyst for the esterification of oleic acid. Fuel 140:669–676. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilbert EE (1977) Sulfonation and related reactions. Krieger, HuntingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Grishchenko LM, Diyuk VE, Konoplitska OP, Lisnyak VV, Maryichuk RT (2017) Modeling of copper ions adsorption onto oxidative-modified activated carbons. Adsorpt Sci Technol 35:884–900. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guedidi H, Reinert L, Leveque J-M, Soneda Y, Bellakhal N, Duclaux L (2013) The effect of the surface oxidation of activated carbon, the solution pH and the temperature on adsorption of ibuprofen. Carbon 54:432–443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanelt S, Friedrich JF, Meyer-Plath A (2013) UV spectrometric indirect analysis of brominated MWCNTs with UV active thiols and an alkene—reaction kinetics, quantification and differentiation of adsorbed bromine and oxygen. Materials 6:3035–3063. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hattori H, Ono Y (2015) Solid acid catalysis: from fundamentals to applications. Pan Stanford, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ho CT, Chung DDL (1990) Kinetics of intercalate desorption from carbon fibers intercalated with bromine. Carbon 28:825–830. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu S, Jiang F, Hsieh Y-L (2015) 1D Lignin-based solid acid catalysts for cellulose hydrolysis to glucose and nanocellulose. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:2566–2574. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jagiello J, Olivier JP (2013) 2D-NLDFT adsorption models for carbon slit-shaped pores with surface energetical heterogeneity and geometrical corrugation. Carbon 55:70–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiang Y, Li X, Cao Q, Mu X (2011) Acid functionalized, highly dispersed carbonaceous spheres: an effective solid acid for hydrolysis of polysaccharides. J Nanopart Res 13:463–469. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaludjerović B (2016) Nanoporous carbon fibrous materials. Chapter 22. In: Sattler KD (ed) Nanoparticles, nanocapsules, nanofibers, nanoporous structures, and nanocomposites, vol II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 487–505.
  26. Kang S, Ye J, Chang J (2013) Recent advances in carbon-based sulfonated catalyst: preparation and application. Int Rev Chem Eng 5:133–143Google Scholar
  27. Knaggs EA, Nepras MJ (2014) Sulfonation and sulfation, in Kirk–Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  28. Li D, Ma X (2013) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon fibers from liquefied wood. Cellulose 20(4):1649–1656. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Q, Chen S, Zhuang L, Xu X, Li H (2012) Preparation of a sulfonated activated carbon fiber catalyst with γ-irradiation-induced grafting method. J Mater Res 27:3083–3089. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mays TJ (2007) A new classification of pore sizes. Stud Surf Sci Catal 160:57–62. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mochida I, Miyamoto S, Kuroda K, Kawano S, Yatsunami S, Korai Y, Yasutake A, Yoshikawa M (1999) Adsorption and adsorbed species of SO2 during its oxidative removal over pitch-based activated carbon fibers. Energy Fuels 13:369–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moreno-Castilla C, Lopez-Ramon MV, Carrasco-Marín F (2000) Changes in surface chemistry of activated carbons by wet oxidation. Carbon 38:1995–2001. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Multian VV, Kinzerskyi FE, Vakaliuk AV et al (2017) Surface response of brominated carbon media on laser and thermal excitation: optical and thermal analysis study. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nakajima K, Hara M (2012) Amorphous carbon with SO3H groups as a solid brønsted acid catalyst. ACS Catal 2:1296–1304. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Noroozi B, Mehdipour M (2016) Activated carbon nanoadsorbents. In: Sattler KD (ed) Nanoparticles, nanocapsules, nanofibers, nanoporous structures, and nanocomposites, vol II, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 203–219.
  36. Park S-J (2015) Carbon fibers. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodríguez-Reinoso F, Sepúlveda-Escribano A, Silvestre-Albero J (2016) Sorption processes. In: Kanellopoulos N (ed) Nanoporous materials: advanced techniques for characterization, modeling, and processing, 1st edn. CRC, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 307–353.
  38. Roldán L, Santos I, Armenise S et al (2012) The formation of a hydrothermal carbon coating on graphite microfiber felts for using as structured acid catalyst. Carbon 50:1363–1372. Google Scholar
  39. Roque-Malherbe RMA (2007) Adsorption and diffusion in nanoporous material. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skubiszewska-Zięba J, Charmas B, Kołtowski M, Oleszczuk P (2017) Active carbons from waste biochars. J Therm Anal Calorim 130:15–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith MB, March J (2007) March’s advanced organic chemistry: reactions, mechanisms, and structure. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  42. OJSC SvetlogorskKhimvolokno (2016) Activated carbon fiber cloth busofit. Accessed 14 Aug 2018
  43. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV, Olivier JP, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 87:1051–1069. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vollhardt P, Schore NE (2007) Organic chemistry: structure and function. Freeman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  45. Wade LG Jr (2013) Organic chemistry, 8th edn. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical FacultyTaras Shevchenko National University of KyivKyivUkraine
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Faculty of Humanities and Natural SciencesUniversity of Prešov in PrešovPrešovSlovakia
  3. 3.Institute of Physical-Organic ChemistryThe National Academy of Science of BelarusMinskBelarus
  4. 4.O.O. Chuiko Institute of Surface ChemistryThe National Academy of Science of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations