Skip to main content
Log in

Size and mobility do matter: a modified scheme of interspecific interactions

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Symbiosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interactions among species play a major role in shaping ecological and evolutionary patterns. In natural communities we see myriads of interactions and the great challenge is how to classify them into a finite number of discrete categories. Interspecific interactions are traditionally displayed in a grid according to their outcome (positive, negative or neutral) for each partner. However, this outcome-based framework ignores functional inequality between interacting organisms. The distinction between partners of different “strength” – relative size and/or motility – can be used for modification of traditional outcome framework. Here I have enlarged classic 3 × 3 scheme (designed for classifying interactions between equal partners) by adding strong/weak and host/inhabitant interacting pairs. By using this approach we can formulate explicit verbal definitions for 27 interaction types. Terminology for specific, generic and “umbrella” concepts is discussed. In result we have more detailed and adequate framework that allows, for example, discrimination of interactions that are mingled together in other schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Abrams PA (1987) On classifying interactions between populations. Oecologia 73:272–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boaventura D, Da Fonseca LC, Hawkins SJ (2003) Size matters: competition within populations of the limpet Patella depressa. J Anim Ecol 72:435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein JL (1994) Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:214–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90246-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18(3):119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder PR (1952) Cooperation and conflict among primitive organisms. Am Sc 40:600–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine C, Guimarães PR Jr, Kéfi S, Loeuille N, Memmott J, van der Putten WH, van Veen FJF, Thébault E (2011) The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks. Ecol Lett 14:1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01688.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher MJ, Dick JTA, Dunn AM (2014) Parasites that change predator or prey behaviour can have keystone effects on community composition. Biol Lett 10:20130879. .1098/rsbl.2013.0879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes LM, Bao J, Hu Z-L, Honavar V, Reecy JM (2008) Animal trait ontology: the importance and usefulness of a unified trait vocabulary for animal species. J Anim Sc 86:1485–1491. .2527/jas.2008-0930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulburt EM (1996) The symmetry of adaptation in predominantly asymmetrical contexts. Ecol Model 85:173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(94)00150-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khabibullin VF (2016) Location and foraging as basis for classification of biotic interactions. Theory Biosci 135(1–2):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-016-0228-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty KD, Kuris AM (2002) Trophic strategies, animal diversity and body size. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17(11):507–513.1016/S0169-5347(02)02615-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonelli S (2012) Classificatory theory in data-intensive science: the case of open biomedical ontologies. Int Studies Phil Sc 26:47–65. .1080/02698595.2012.653119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung TLF (2014) Fish as parasites: an insight into evolutionary convergence in adaptations for parasitism. J Zool 294:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum E (1953) Fundamentals of ecology. W.B.Saunders press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (2000) Evolutionary ecology, sixth edn. Addison-Wesley-Longman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf VHW, Rasmussen NL, Dibble CJ, Allen BGV (2014) Resolving the roles of body size and species identity in driving functional diversity. Proc R Soc Lon B 281:201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang RW, He JZ, Wang YQ, Shi L, Li YT (2010) Asymmetric interaction will facilitate the evolution of cooperation. Sc China Life Sc 53:1041–1046.1007/s11427-010-4016-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuk AV (2005) Forms and place of mutualism in the system of symbiotic relationships of high plants with other organisms. Vestnik of S-Ptsb Univ 1:3–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viner F. Khabibullin.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khabibullin, V.F. Size and mobility do matter: a modified scheme of interspecific interactions. Symbiosis 79, 263–267 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-019-00643-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-019-00643-1

Keywords

Navigation