Symbiosis

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 51–59 | Cite as

No mutual symbiosis following infection of algae-free Paramecium bursaria with symbiotic algae from Mayorella viridis

Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

The amoeba, Mayorella viridis contains several hundred symbiotic green algae in its cytoplasm. Transmission electron microscopy revealed strong resemblance between symbiotic algae from M. viridis the symbiotic Chlorella sp. in the perialgal vacuoles of Paramecium bursaria and other ciliates. Although it is thought that the M. viridis and symbiotic algae could be model organisms for studying endosymbiosis between protists and green algae, few cell biological observations of the endosymbiosis between M. viridis and their symbiotic algae have been published. In this study, we characterized the specificity of endosymbiotic relationships between green algae and their hosts. Initially, we established stable cultures of M. viridis in KCM medium by feeding with Chlorogonium capillatum. Microscopic analyses showed that chloroplasts of symbiotic algae in M. viridis occupy approximately half of the algal cells, whereas those in P. bursaria occupy entire algal cells. The symbiotic algae in P. bursaria contain several small spherical vacuoles. The labeling of actin filaments using Acti-stain™ 488 Fluorescent Phalloidin revealed no relationship between host actin filaments and symbiotic algal localization, although the host mitochondria were localized around symbiotic algae. Symbiotic algae from M. viridis could infect algae-free P. bursaria but could not support P. bursaria growth without feeding, whereas the original symbiotic algae of P. bursaria supported its growth without feeding. These data indicated the specificity of endosymbiotic algae relationships in M. viridis and P. bursaria.

Keywords

Algae Endosymbiosis Mayorella viridis Paramecium bursaria Phalloidin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) [Number 26840119] from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to Y. Kodama. The authors thank the faculty of Life and Environmental Science at Shimane University for financial supports and Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Author Contributions

Yuuki Kodama conceived and designed the experiments, Shion Kawai and Sotarou Araki performed the experiments, and Yuuki Kodama wrote the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Shion Kawai, Sotarou Araki, and Yuuki Kodama declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bonnet L, Brabet J, Comoy N, Guitard J (1981) Nouvelle données sur le thécamoebien filosia Amphitrema flavum (Archer 1877) Penard 1902. Protistologica 17:225–233Google Scholar
  2. Cann JP (1981) An ultrastructural study of Mayorella viridis (Leidy) (Amoebida: Paramoebidae), a Rhizopod containing zoochlorellae. Arch Protistenkd 124:353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dryl S (1959) Antigenic transformation in Paramecium aurelia after homologous antiserum treatment during autogamy and conjugation. J Protozool 6:25Google Scholar
  4. Esteban GF, Finlay BJ, Clarke KJ (2009) Sequestered organelles sustain aerobic microbial life in anoxic environments. Environ Microbiol 11:544–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujishima M, Kodama Y (2012) Endosymbionts in Paramecium. Europ J Protistol 48:124–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujishima M, Nagahara K, Kojima Y (1990) Changes in morphology, buoyant density and protein composition in differentiation from the reproductive short form to the infectious long form of Holospora obtusa, a macronucleus-specific symbiont of the ciliate Paramecium caudatum. Zool Sci 7:849–860Google Scholar
  7. Jeon KW (2004) Genetic and physiological interactions in the amoeba-bacteria symbiosis. Eukaryot Microbiol 51:502–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeon KW, Lorch IJ (1967) Unusual intra-cellular bacterial infection in large, free-living amoebae. Exp Cell Res 48:236–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Karakashian SJ (1963) Growth of Paramecium bursaria as influenced by the presence of algal symbionts. Physiol Zool 36:52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kies L (1984) Einzeller mit blaugrünen endosymbionten (Cyanellen) als objekte der symbioseforschung und modellorganismen für die evolution der chloroplasten. Biol Rdsch 22:145–157Google Scholar
  11. Kodama Y, Fujishima M (2005) Symbiotic Chlorella sp. of the ciliate Paramecium bursaria do not prevent acidification and lysosomal fusion of host digestive vacuoles during infection. Protoplasma 225:191–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kodama Y, Fujishima M (2007) Infectivity of Chlorella species for the ciliate Paramecium bursaria is not based on sugar residues of their cell wall components, but on their ability to localize beneath the host cell membrane after escaping from the host digestive vacuole in the early infection process. Protoplasma 231:55–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kodama Y, Fujishima M (2009a) Timing of perialgal vacuole membrane differentiation from digestive vacuole membrane in infection of symbiotic algae Chlorella vulgaris of the ciliate Paramecium bursaria. Protist 160:65–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kodama Y, Fujishima M (2009b) Localization of perialgal vacuoles beneath the host cell surface is not a prerequisite phenomenon for protection from the host's lysosomal fusion in the ciliate Paramecium bursaria. Protist 160:319–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kodama Y, Fujishima M (2011) Endosymbiosis of Chlorella species to the ciliate Paramecium bursaria alters the distribution of the host's trichocysts beneath the host cell cortex. Protoplasma 248:325–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kodama Y, Fujishima M (2012) Cell division and density of symbiotic Chlorella variabilis of the ciliate Paramecium bursaria is controlled by the host’s nutritional conditions during early infection process. Environ Microbiol 14:2800–2811CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kodama Y, Fujishima M (2016) Paramecium as a model organism for studies on primary and secondary endosymbioses. In: Witzany G, Nowacki M (eds) Biocommunication of ciliates. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 277–304Google Scholar
  18. Kodama Y, Suzuki H, Dohra H, Sugii M, Kitazume T, Yamaguchi K, Shigenobu S, Fujishima M (2014) Comparison of gene expression of Paramecium bursaria with and without Chlorella variabilis symbionts. BMC Genomics 15:183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kudryashev M, Lepper S, Stanway R, Bohn S, Baumeister W, Cyrklaff M, Frischknecht F (2010) Positioning of large organelles by a membrane- associated cytoskeleton in Plasmodium sporozoites. Cell Microbiol 12:362–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Leidy J (1874) Notice of some freshwater and terrestrial Rhizopods. Proc Acad Natl Sci Phila 167:86–87Google Scholar
  21. Muscatine L, Lenhoff HM (1965) Symbiosis of Hydra and algae. II. Effects of limited food and starvation on growth of symbiotic and aposymbiotic Hydra. Biol Bull 129:316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muscatine L, Karakashian SJ, Karakashian MW (1967) Soluble extracellular products of algae symbiotic with a ciliate, a sponge and a mutant hydra. Comp Biochem Physiol 20:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nishijima A, Fujishima M (2007) Chlorella vulgaris and C. sorokiniana cannot be maintained in Paramecium bursaria cell. Jpn. J Protozool 40:28–29Google Scholar
  24. Nishimura T, Yamaguchi H, Kodama Y, Nakayama T, Nakayama T, Inouye I (2009) Phylogenetic position of symbiotic chlorella (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta) of Mayorella Viridis (Amoebozoa) and its symbiotic manner. Meeting Abstract 271. Phycologia 48:94–95Google Scholar
  25. Pollard TD, Blanchoin L, Mullins RD (2000) Molecular mechanisms controlling actin filament dynamics in nonmuscle cells. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29:545–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Reisser W (1984) The taxonomy of green algae endosymbiotic in ciliates and a sponge. Br Phycol J 19:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schaeffer AA (1926) Taxonomy of the amebas, with descriptions of thirty-nine new marine and freshwater species. Carnegie institution of Washington, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Schönborn W (1965) Untersuchungen über die Zoochlorellen-Symbiose der Hochmoor-Testaceen. Limnologica 3:173–176Google Scholar
  29. Sørensen MES, Cameron DD, Brockhurst MA, Wood AJ (2016) Metabolic constraints for a novel symbiosis. R Soc Open Sci 3:150708CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Stiven AE (1965) The relationship between size, budding rate, and growth efficiency in three species of hydra. Res Popul Ecol 7:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Takeda H, Sekiguchi T, Nunokawa S, Usuki I (1998) Species-specificity of Chlorella for establishment of symbiotic association with Paramecium bursaria. Does infectivity depend upon sugar components of the cell wall? Eur J Protistol 34:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tonooka Y, Watanabe T (2002) A natural strain of Paramecium bursaria lacking symbiotic algae. Eur J Protistol 38:55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsukii Y, Harumoto T, Yazaki K (1995) Evidence for a viral macronuclear endosymbiont in Paramecium caudatum. J Euk Microbiol 42:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Willumsen NBS (1982) Chaos zoochlorellae sp. nov. (Gymnamoebia, Amoebidae) from a Danish freshwater pond. J Nat Hist 16:803–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Science, Faculty of Life and Environmental ScienceShimane UniversityMatsue-shiJapan
  2. 2.Course of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Life and Environmental ScienceShimane UniversityMatsue-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations