No mutual symbiosis following infection of algae-free Paramecium bursaria with symbiotic algae from Mayorella viridis
- 89 Downloads
The amoeba, Mayorella viridis contains several hundred symbiotic green algae in its cytoplasm. Transmission electron microscopy revealed strong resemblance between symbiotic algae from M. viridis the symbiotic Chlorella sp. in the perialgal vacuoles of Paramecium bursaria and other ciliates. Although it is thought that the M. viridis and symbiotic algae could be model organisms for studying endosymbiosis between protists and green algae, few cell biological observations of the endosymbiosis between M. viridis and their symbiotic algae have been published. In this study, we characterized the specificity of endosymbiotic relationships between green algae and their hosts. Initially, we established stable cultures of M. viridis in KCM medium by feeding with Chlorogonium capillatum. Microscopic analyses showed that chloroplasts of symbiotic algae in M. viridis occupy approximately half of the algal cells, whereas those in P. bursaria occupy entire algal cells. The symbiotic algae in P. bursaria contain several small spherical vacuoles. The labeling of actin filaments using Acti-stain™ 488 Fluorescent Phalloidin revealed no relationship between host actin filaments and symbiotic algal localization, although the host mitochondria were localized around symbiotic algae. Symbiotic algae from M. viridis could infect algae-free P. bursaria but could not support P. bursaria growth without feeding, whereas the original symbiotic algae of P. bursaria supported its growth without feeding. These data indicated the specificity of endosymbiotic algae relationships in M. viridis and P. bursaria.
KeywordsAlgae Endosymbiosis Mayorella viridis Paramecium bursaria Phalloidin
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) [Number 26840119] from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to Y. Kodama. The authors thank the faculty of Life and Environmental Science at Shimane University for financial supports and Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.
Yuuki Kodama conceived and designed the experiments, Shion Kawai and Sotarou Araki performed the experiments, and Yuuki Kodama wrote the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Shion Kawai, Sotarou Araki, and Yuuki Kodama declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bonnet L, Brabet J, Comoy N, Guitard J (1981) Nouvelle données sur le thécamoebien filosia Amphitrema flavum (Archer 1877) Penard 1902. Protistologica 17:225–233Google Scholar
- Dryl S (1959) Antigenic transformation in Paramecium aurelia after homologous antiserum treatment during autogamy and conjugation. J Protozool 6:25Google Scholar
- Fujishima M, Nagahara K, Kojima Y (1990) Changes in morphology, buoyant density and protein composition in differentiation from the reproductive short form to the infectious long form of Holospora obtusa, a macronucleus-specific symbiont of the ciliate Paramecium caudatum. Zool Sci 7:849–860Google Scholar
- Kies L (1984) Einzeller mit blaugrünen endosymbionten (Cyanellen) als objekte der symbioseforschung und modellorganismen für die evolution der chloroplasten. Biol Rdsch 22:145–157Google Scholar
- Kodama Y, Fujishima M (2007) Infectivity of Chlorella species for the ciliate Paramecium bursaria is not based on sugar residues of their cell wall components, but on their ability to localize beneath the host cell membrane after escaping from the host digestive vacuole in the early infection process. Protoplasma 231:55–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kodama Y, Fujishima M (2016) Paramecium as a model organism for studies on primary and secondary endosymbioses. In: Witzany G, Nowacki M (eds) Biocommunication of ciliates. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 277–304Google Scholar
- Leidy J (1874) Notice of some freshwater and terrestrial Rhizopods. Proc Acad Natl Sci Phila 167:86–87Google Scholar
- Nishijima A, Fujishima M (2007) Chlorella vulgaris and C. sorokiniana cannot be maintained in Paramecium bursaria cell. Jpn. J Protozool 40:28–29Google Scholar
- Nishimura T, Yamaguchi H, Kodama Y, Nakayama T, Nakayama T, Inouye I (2009) Phylogenetic position of symbiotic chlorella (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta) of Mayorella Viridis (Amoebozoa) and its symbiotic manner. Meeting Abstract 271. Phycologia 48:94–95Google Scholar
- Schaeffer AA (1926) Taxonomy of the amebas, with descriptions of thirty-nine new marine and freshwater species. Carnegie institution of Washington, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Schönborn W (1965) Untersuchungen über die Zoochlorellen-Symbiose der Hochmoor-Testaceen. Limnologica 3:173–176Google Scholar