Skip to main content

Artificial intelligence-based Kubernetes container for scheduling nodes of energy composition

Abstract

Kubernetes is a portable, extensible, open-source platform for managing containerized workloads and services that facilitates both declarative configuration and automation. This study presents Kubernetes Container Scheduling Strategy (KCSS) based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) that can assist in decision making to control the scheduling and shifting of load to nodes. The aim is to improve the container’s schedule requested digitally from users to enhance the efficiency in scheduling and reduce cost. The constraints associated with the existing container scheduling techniques which often assign a node to every new container based on a personal criterion by relying on individual terms has been greatly improved by the new system presented in this study. The KCSS presented in this study provides multicriteria node selection based on artificial intelligence in terms of decision making systems thereby giving the scheduler a broad picture of the cloud's condition and the user's requirements. AI Scheduler allows users to easily make use of fractional Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), integer GPUs, and multiple-nodes of GPUs, for distributed training on Kubernetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Ahmed E, Gani A, Khan MK, Buyya R, Khan SU (2015) Seamless application execution in mobile cloud computing: motivation, taxonomy, and open challenges. J Netw Comput Appl 52:154–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed E, Naveed A, Gani A, Hamid SHA, Imran M, Guizani M (2017) Process state synchronization for mobility support in mobile cloud computing. In: IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp. 1–6

  3. Alicherry M, Lakshman T (2013) Optimizing data access latencies in cloud systems by intelligent virtual machine placement. IEEE INFOCOM. pp. 647–655

  4. Amit K, Chinmay C, Wilson J, Kishor A, Chakraborty C, Jeberson W (2020) A novel fog computing approach for minimization of latency in healthcare using machine learning. Int J Interact Multimedia Artif Intell. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2020.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amit S, Lalit G, Chinmay C (2021) Improvement of system performance in an IT production support environment. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01092-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ardagna D, Panicucci B, Trubian M, Zhang L (2012) Energy-aware autonomic resource allocation in multitier virtualized environments. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 5(1):2–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ariza-Colpas PP, Ayala-Mantilla CE, Shaheen Q, Piñeres-Melo MA, Villate-Daza DA, Morales-Ortega RC, De-la-Hoz-Franco E, Sanchez-Moreno H, Aziz BS, Afzal M (2021) SISME, estuarine monitoring system based on IOT and machine learning for the detection of salt wedge in aquifers: case study of the Magdalena River estuary. Sensors 21(7):2374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aroca JA, Anta AF, Mosteiro MA, Thraves C, Wang L (2016) Power-efficient assignment of virtual machines to physical machines. Future Generat Comput Syst 54:82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baccarelli E, Amendola D, Cordeschi N (2015) Minimum-energy bandwidth management for qos live migration of virtual machines. Comput Network 93:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Beloglazov A, Abawajy J, Buyya R (2012) Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient management of data centers for cloud computing. Future Generat Comput Syst 28(5):755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen X, Li C, Jiang Y (2015) Optimization model and algorithm for energy efficient virtual node embedding. IEEE Commun Lett 19(8):1327–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chinmay C, Roy R, Pathak S, Chakrabarti S (2011) An optimal probabilistic traffic engineering scheme for heterogeneous networks. CIIT Int J Fuzzy Syst 3(2):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chinmay C, Roy R (2012) Markov decision process based optimal gateway selection algorithm. Int J Syst Algorithms Appl 48–52

  14. Chowdhury N, Rahman M, Boutaba R (2009) Virtual network embedding with coordinated node and link mapping. In: IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 783–791

  15. Cordeschi N, Patriarca T, Baccarelli E (2012) Stochastic traffic engineering for realtime applications over wireless networks. J Netw Comput Appl 35(2):681–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dean J, Ghemawat S (2008) Mapreduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun ACM 51(1):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dłaz M, Martłn C, Rubio B (2016) State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of internet of things and cloud computing. J Netw Comput Appl 67:99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elhady GF, Tawfeek MA (2015) A comparative study into swarm intelligence algorithms for dynamic tasks scheduling in cloud computing. In: 2015 IEEE Seventh international conference on intelligent computing and information systems (ICICIS) (pp. 362–369). IEEE

  19. Fazio M, Celesti A, Ranjan R, Liu C, Chen L, Villari M (2016) Open issues in scheduling microservices in the cloud. IEEE Cloud Comput 3(5):81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Felter W, Ferreira A, Rajamony R, Rubio J, (2015) An updated performance comparison of virtual machines and linux containers. In: 2015 IEEE International symposium on performance analysis of systems and software (ISPASS), pp. 171–172

  21. Gill SS, Tuli S, Xu M, Singh I, Singh KV, Lindsay D, Tuli S, Smirnova D, Singh M, Jain U, Pervaiz H (2019) Transformative effects of IoT, blockchain and artificial intelligence on cloud computing: evolution, vision, trends and open challenges. Internet Things 8:100118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guan X, Choi BY, Song S (2015) Energy efficient virtual network embedding for green dcs using dc topology and future migration. Comput Commun 69:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guan X, Choi BY, Song S (2014) Topology and migration-aware energy efficient virtual network embedding for green dcs. In: 23rd International conference on computer communication and networks (ICCCN). IEEE, pp. 1–8

  24. Guerrero C, Lera I, Juiz C (2018) Genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization of container allocation in cloud architecture. J Grid Comput 16(1):113–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang J, Lu J, Zhang G, Long G (2013) Optimal cloud resource auto-scaling for web applications. In: International symposium on cluster, cloud and grid computing (CCGrid), pp. 58–65

  26. Kaewkasi C, Chuenmuneewong K (2017) Improvement of container scheduling for docker using ant colony optimization. In: 9th International conference on knowledge and smart technology (KST), pp. 254–259

  27. López-Torres S, López-Torres H, Rocha-Rocha J, Butt SA, Tariq MI, Collazos-Morales C, Piñeres-Espitia G (2019) IoT monitoring of water consumption for irrigation systems using SEMMA methodology. In: International conference on intelligent human computer interaction (pp. 222–234). Springer, Cham

  28. Onyema EM (2019) Integration of emerging technologies in teaching and learning process in Nigeria: the challenges. Central Asian J Math Theory Comput Sci 1(1):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rimal Y, Pandit P, Gocchait S, Butt SA, Obaid AJ (1804) (2021) Hyperparameter determines the best learning curve on single, multi-layer and deep neural network of student grade prediction of Pokhara University Nepal. J Phys Conf Ser 1:012054

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sachin D, Chinmay C, Jaroslav F, Rashmi G, Arun KR, Subhendu KP (2021) SSII: Secured and high-quality Steganography using Intelligent hybrid optimization algorithms for IoT. IEEE Access 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3089357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shaheen Q, Shiraz M, Hashmi MU, Mahmood D, Akhtar R (2020) A lightweight location-aware fog framework (LAFF) for QoS in internet of things paradigm. Mobile Inf Syst. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8871976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zheng Y, Cai L, Huang S, WangZ (2014) VM scheduling strategies based on artificial intelligence in Cloud Testing. In: 15th IEEE/ACIS international conference on software engineering, artificial intelligence, networking and parallel/distributed computing (SNPD) (pp. 1–7). IEEE

Download references

Funding

There was no outside funding or grants received that assisted in this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chinmay Chakraborty.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jorge-Martinez, D., Butt, S.A., Onyema, E.M. et al. Artificial intelligence-based Kubernetes container for scheduling nodes of energy composition. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01195-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Scheduling strategy
  • Multi-criteria scheduler
  • Automated scheduling
  • Kubernetes