Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A conceptual framework for risk matrix capitalization

  • Case studies
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on risk matrices show that there is considerable diversity in the practice of designing risk matrices. This has led to serious problems of standardization and communication. Indeed, these problems affect at the same time on the development of matrices and in their exploitation in term of risk assessment. To solve these problems, this paper proposes an experience feedback method that aims to capitalize the feedback invariants resulting from the analysis of existing risk matrices. This capitalization allows developing a theoretical framework of the robust risk matrices design. The application of the proposed method for examples of matrices confirms the interest of articulating these risk matrices designs through an argument based on experience feedback. In this sense, the merit of the proposed experience feedback method is that it promotes the sharing of knowledge between the actors involved in a risk assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu-Saurin T, Basso-Werle N-J (2017) A framework for the analysis of slack in socio technical systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 167(11):439–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleksandrovskaya LN, Ardalionova AE, Papic L (2019) Application of probability distributions mixture of safety indicator in risk assessment problems. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10(1):3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorim N (2000) Aide à la concertation et à la décision dans le cadre de processus de décision publique complexes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris Dauphine-France (in French)

  • Beler C (2008) Generic modeling of a cognitive experience feedback: application to risks prevention, Ph.D. thesis presented at the University of Toulouse, France

  • Bourgoin A, Marchessaux F, Bencherki N (2018) We need to talk about strategy: How to conduct effective strategic dialogue? Bus Horiz 61(4):587–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon W, Beach M-C, Links A-R, Boss E-F (2018) An expanded framework to define and measure shared decision-making in dialogue: a ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approach. Patient Educ Couns 8:1368–1377

    Google Scholar 

  • Camara T, Kamsu-Foguen B, Diourte B, Issa Maiga A (2016) Experience feedback for risk assessment in aeronautic buildings. J Clean Prod 137(11):1237–1245

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Endriss U (2019) Preservation of semantic properties in collective argumentation: the case of aggregating abstract argumentation frameworks. Artif Intell 269(4):27–48

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clermont P, Kamsu-Foguem B (2018) Experience feedback in product life cycle management. Comput Ind 95(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejan R (2013) A tool for risk assessment. Saf Eng 3(3):121–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Y, Mo H, Deng X, Sadiq R, Deng Y (2014) A new method in failure mode and affects analysis based on evidential reasoning. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 5(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubiez P, Bennaceur D (1993) Industrial risk management: sate of the art, EDF-France. Report. No. 93NB00164

  • Duijm N-J (2015) Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Saf Sci 76(7):21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcina A, Petrillo A, Di Bona G, De Felice F, Silvestri A (2017) An innovative model to optimise inventory management: a case study in healthcare sector. Int J Serv Oper Manag 27(4):549–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Gupta S (2017) Modeling economic system using fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8(2):1472–1486

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hadef H (2019) Apports des outils de concertation à la gestion des risques majeurs en Algérie, Ph.D. thesis presented in University of Batna 2, Algeria (in French)

  • Hadef H, Djebabra M (2019a) Proposal method for the classification of industrial accident scenarios based on the improved principal components analysis (improved PCA). Prod Eng Res Devel 13:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadef H, Djebabra M (2019b) PCA-I and AHP methods: unavoidable arguments in accident scenario classification. J Fail Anal Prev 19(2):496–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadef H, Djebabra M, Sedrat L, Taghelabet M (2019) Contribution to the evaluation of safety barriers performance. World J Sci Technol Sustain Dev 16(1):56–68

    Google Scholar 

  • He L, Chen Y, Liu L-Y (2013) A risk matrix approach on clustering algorithm. J Appl Sci 13(20):4188–4194

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitz J-M (2013) La décision et ses manifestations, Revue interdisciplinaire management. Homme Entrep 5:106–117 (in Franch)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huihui N, Chen A, Chen N (2010) Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Saf Sci 48(10):1269–1278

    Google Scholar 

  • Jocelyn S, Chinniah Y, Ouali M-S (2016) Contribution of dynamic experience feedback to the quantitative estimation of risks for preventing accidents: a proposed methodology for machinery safety. Saf Sci 88(10):64–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanki B-G (2018) Cognitive functions and human error. Space Saf Hum Perform. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 17–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerven G-Y (1995) Eléments fondamentaux des cindyniques, Ed. Economica – Paris, France (in French)

  • Mbave S, Kouabenan R, Samin P (2009) Operational experience feedback and naïve causal explanations. Number 2009-08 of the Safety Industrial Books, Foundation for an Industrial Safety Culture, Toulouse, France. Available at: foncsi.org/en/

  • Merad M-M (2004) Analyse de l’état de l’art sur les grilles de criticité, INERIS report, France, DRA-38 (in French)

  • Muriana C, Vizzini G (2017) Project risk management: a deterministic quantitative technique for assessment and mitigation. Int J Project Manage 35(3):320–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikfalazar S, Khoshidi H-A, Hamadani A-Z (2016) Fuzzy risk analysis by similarity-based multi-criteria approach to classify alternatives. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7(3):250–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters W, Peng Z (2015) An approach towards global standardization of the risk matrix. J Space Saf Eng 2(1):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrillo A, Di Bona G, Forcina A, Silvestri A (2018) Building excellence through the Agile Reengineering Performance Model (ARPM): a strategic business model for organizations. Bus Process Manag J 24(1):128–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Qichao Z, Xinghua K, Yongping S (2003) Risk matrix method and its application in the field of technical project risk. Manag Eng Sci 5(1):89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Qing H, Qingsheng X, Shaobo L (2017) The model of information security risk assessment based on advanced evidence theory. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8(3):2030–2035

    Google Scholar 

  • Saadi S, Djebabra M, Boubaker L (2011) Proposal for a new allocation method of environmental goals applied to an Algerian cement factory. Manag Environ Qual Int J 22(5):581–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmi S, Chaib R (2017) Feedback a learning tool for future organizations. World J Eng 14(6):545–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepczuk M, Kotulski Z (2018) A new risk-based authentication management model oriented on user’s experience. Comput Sec 73(3):17–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P, Saxena K (2017) Application of fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm in heart disease risk level prediction. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8(2):1109–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve E (2012) Hybridization of the statistic and cognitive experience feedbacks for the risk assessment, Ph.D. thesis presented at the University of Toulouse, France

  • Wang N, Xu C, Du X et al (2018) A risk assessment method of deep excavation based on Bayesian analysis and expert elicitation. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9(2):452–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Q (2018) A matter-element method for risk identification of technology innovation. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9(3):716–728

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zazhigalkin A-Z, Aronoy J-Z, Maksimova O-V, Papic L (2019) Control of consensus convergence in technical committees of standardization on the basis of regular Markov chains model. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10(1):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong O, Fan X, Luo X, Toni F (2019) An explainable multi-attribute decision model based on argumentation. Expert Syst Appl 117(3):42–61

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Engineering Department, Institute of Technology, Kasdi Merbah University of Ouargla, Ouargla, Algeria

    Hadef Hefaidh

  2. LRPI Laboratory – IHSI Institute, University of Chahid Mostepha Ben Boulaid - Batna 2, Batna, Algeria

    Hadef Hefaidh & Djebabra Mébarek

Authors
  1. Hadef Hefaidh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Djebabra Mébarek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Djebabra Mébarek.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hefaidh, H., Mébarek, D. A conceptual framework for risk matrix capitalization. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 11, 755–764 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00949-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00949-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation