Skip to main content

Cubic reward penalty structure for power distribution companies

Abstract

An important significance of restructuring in power industry is the emergence of regulatory performance indices in the power distribution companies. Reward-penalty scheme is a direct control method that regulators use to assure the performance regulatory controls such as system reliability, service efficiency, and customer interruption cost. It is used as a financial tool designed to prevent the service reliability and efficiency deterioration of power distribution companies. Reward penalty scheme rewards the distribution company which provides good reliable power and penalizes those who act otherwise. In this paper, we propose a Cubic Reward-Penalty scheme, to improve the service reliability of power distribution companies. The novel feature of this scheme is the use of cubic reward/penalty formulation which varies in a cubic fashion based on the behavior of the performance-based reliability. In this paper, two methods of implementing Cubic Reward-Penalty scheme are explained: CRPS with no dead band and no reward/penalty capping and CRPS with dead band and reward/penalty capping. These proposed approaches are mainly intended for the regulators who are concerned about the customers affected by the outage duration. The significance of this research, lies in encouraging power distribution companies, to maintain, or even improve, customer service and satisfaction, by developing the Performance Regulatory Reward-Penalty schemes. This paper also provides most of the requirements and design rationale of Cubic Reward-Penalty Structure, its theoretical foundation and its prototype implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Adefarati T, Bansal RC (2017) Reliability assessment of distribution system with the integration of renewable distributed generation. Appl Energy 185(January):158–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajodhia V, Hakvoort R (2005) Economic regulation of quality in electricity distribution networks. Utilities Policy 13(3):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajodhia V, Schiavo LL, Malaman R (2006) Quality regulation of electricity distribution in Italy: an evaluation study. Energy Policy 34(13):1478–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan RN (2013) Reliability evaluation of power systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvehag K, Awodele K (2014) Impact of Reward and penalty scheme on the incentives for distribution system reliability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(1):386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvehag K, Söder L (2010) Financial risk assessment for distribution system operators regulated by quality regulation. In: IEEE, pp 475–480

  • Alvehag K, Söder L (2011) Risk-based method for distribution system reliability investment decisions under performance-based regulation. Gener Transm Distrib IET 5(10):1062–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvehag K, Söder L (2012) Quality regulation impact on investment decisions in distribution system reliability. In: 2012 9th international conference on the European Energy Market, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2012.6254646

  • Alvehag K, Söder L (2012) Comparison of cost models for estimating customer interruption costs. In: Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS), Istanbul, Turkey

  • Bertling L, Allan R, Eriksson R (2005) A reliability-centered asset maintenance method for assessing the impact of maintenance in power distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(1):75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biewald B, Synapse Energy Economics (1997) Performance-based regulation in a restructured electric industry. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Pan Z (2002) Incorporating Reliability Index probability distributions in performance based regulation. In: IEEE, vol 1, pp 12–17

  • Billinton R, Pan Z (2004) Historic performance-based distribution system risk assessment. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 19(4):1759–1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Wangdee W (2006) Utilizing bulk electric system reliability performance index probability distributions in a performance based regulation framework. In: IEEE, pp 1–6

  • Billinton R, Salvaderi L, McCalley JD, Chao H, Th Seitz RN, Allan JO, Fallon C (1997) Reliability issues in today’s electric power utility environment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12(4):1708–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Cui L, Pan Z (2002) Quantitative reliability considerations in the determination of performance-based rates and customer service disruption payments. In: IET, vol 149, pp 640–644

  • Božič D, Pantoš M (2013) Assessment of investment efficiency in a power system under performance-based regulation. Energy 51:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RE (2008) Electric power distribution reliability. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RE (2009) Electric power distribution reliability. CRC press, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 40–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RE, Burke JJ (2000) Managing the risk of performance based rates. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):893–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury A, Koval D (2009) Standards for reregulated distribution utility. In: Power distribution system reliability: practical methods and applications. Wiley-IEEE Press, pp 317–335. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=5396774

  • Council of European Energy Regulators (2015) CEER benchmarking Report 5.2 on the continuity of electricity supply. C14-EQS-62–03

  • da Silva AL, Nascimento LC, Guimarães ACR, Mello JCO (2010) Reliability indices applied to performance-based mechanisms in electric power distribution systems. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 1(2):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas JAK, Castro SF (2003) Setting of targets for continuity of supply through benchmarking. In: 17th international conference on electricity distribution, Barcelona

  • Farzin H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Moeini-Aghtaie M (2017) Reliability studies of modern distribution systems integrated with renewable generation and parking lots. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 8(1):431–440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2016.2598365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotuhi M, Shourkaei HM, Kharazi MB, Salimi A (2006) Reliability assessment of utilities using an enhanced reward-penalty model in performance based regulation system. In: IEEE, pp 1–6

  • Fumagalli E, Schiavo L, Delestre F (2007) Service quality regulation in electricity distribution and retail. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi M, Dashti R (2018) Designing a decision model to assess the reward and penalty scheme of electric distribution companies. Energy 147(March):329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE Guide for Electric Power Distribution Reliability Indices (2012) IEEE Std 1366-2012 (Revision of IEEE Std 1366-2003), May, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2012.6209381

  • Jooshaki M, Abbaspour A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Moeini-Aghtaie M, Ozdemir A (2014) A new reward-penalty mechanism for distribution companies based on concept of competition. In: IEEE, pp 1–5

  • Larimi SMM, Haghifam MR, Moradkhani A (2016) Risk-based reconfiguration of active electric distribution networks. Transm Distrib IET Gener 10(4):1006–1015. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latify M, Seifi H, Mashhadi HR, Sheikh-El-Eslami MK (2013) Cobweb theory-based generation maintenance coordination in restructured power systems. Gener Transm Distrib IET 7(11):1253–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F (2005) Distributed processing of reliability index assessment and reliability-based network reconfiguration in power distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(1):230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W (2013) Reliability assessment of electric power systems using Monte Carlo methods. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotero RC, Contreras J (2011) Distribution system planning with reliability. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 26(4):2552–2562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modarresi MS, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2012) Effective design of the reward-penalty schemes to reach the highest persuasiveness in selecting investment strategies by electric distribution utilities. In: IET conference proceedings. The Institution of Engineering & Technology. http://search.proquest.com/openview/8ceb8ee32c9a215a2cf0c3284d418f20/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1936365

  • Moeini-Aghtaie M, Farzin H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Amrollahi R (2017) Generalized analytical approach to assess reliability of renewable-based energy hubs. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(1):368–377. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2549747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadnezhad-Shourkaei H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2010) Impact of penalty-reward mechanism on the performance of electric distribution systems and regulator budget. Gener Transm Distrib IET 4(7):770–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadnezhad-Shourkaei H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2011) Principal requirements of designing the reward-penalty schemes for reliability improvement in distribution systems. In: Proc. 21st Int. Conf. Electricity Distribution (CIRED2011), Frankfurt, Germany

  • Mohammadnezhad-Shourkaei H, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Billinton R (2011a) Integration of clustering analysis and reward/penalty mechanisms for regulating service reliability in distribution systems. Gener Transm Distrib IET 5(11):1192–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadnezhad-Shourkaei H, Abiri-Jahromi A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2011b) Incorporating service quality regulation in distribution system maintenance strategy. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 26(4):2495–2504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moradkhani A, Haghifam MR, Abedi SM (2015) Risk-based maintenance scheduling in the presence of reward penalty scheme. Electr Power Syst Res 121:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostaghim N, Haghifam, Simab M (2017) Regulation of electrical distribution companies via efficiency assessments and reward-penalty scheme. J Oper Autom Power Eng 5(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.22098/joape.2017.546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikzad M, Mozafari B (2014) Reliability assessment of incentive- and priced-based demand response programs in restructured power systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 56(March):83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Performance Incentives for Utilities | Synapse Energy (n.d.) Accessed May 31, 2016. http://www.synapse-energy.com/project/performance-incentives-utilities

  • Saboorideilami S, Abdi H (2014) Developing a new risk assessment methodology for distribution system operators regulated by quality regulation considering reclosing time. J Electr Eng Technol 9(4):1154–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiwen Y, Hui H, Chengzhi W, Hao G, Hao F (2017) Review on risk assessment of power system. In: Procedia computer science, 8th international conference on ambient systems, networks and technologies, ANT-2017 and the 7th international conference on sustainable energy information technology, SEIT 2017, 16–19 May 2017, Madeira, Portugal, vol 109 (January), pp 1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.399

  • Simab M, Haghifam MR (2012) Quality performance based regulation through designing reward and penalty scheme for electric distribution companies. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43(1):539–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simab M, Alvehag K, Söder L, Haghifam M-R (2012) Designing reward and penalty scheme in performance based regulation for electric distribution companies. Gener Transm Distrib IET 6(9):893–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simab M, Chatrsimab S, Yazdi S, Simab A (2017) A new method for power system contingency ranking using combination of neural network and data envelopment analysis. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32(6):3859–3866. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-162169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synapse Energy |. (n.d.) Accessed 15 Aug 2016. http://www.synapse-energy.com/

  • Tanure JE, Tahan CMV, Lima JM (2006) Establishing quality performance of distribution companies based on yardstick regulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(3):1148–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Lu J, Bie Z, You S, Cao X (2014) Long-term maintenance scheduling of smart distribution system through a PSO-TS algorithm. J Appl Math 2014:694086. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/694086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangdee W (2005) Bulk electric system reliability simulation and application PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

  • Xu N, Wen F, Huang M, Dong Z (2007) Optimal parameter setting of performance based regulation with reward and penalty. In: IEEE, pp 2740–2744

  • Yahav K, Oron G, Young W (2008) Reliability assessment and performance based incentives of power distribution systems. In: IEEE, pp 222–226

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aneesh Krishna.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sumesh, S., Potdar, V. & Krishna, A. Cubic reward penalty structure for power distribution companies. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 10, 350–368 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00783-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00783-z

Keywords

  • Deregulation
  • Power
  • Reliability
  • Performance
  • Reward
  • Penalty