We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Additive manufacturing applications in Defence Support Services: current practices and framework for implementation | SpringerLink

Additive manufacturing applications in Defence Support Services: current practices and framework for implementation


This research investigates through a systems approach, “Additive Manufacturing” (AM) applications in “Defence Support Services” (DS2). AM technology is gaining increasing interest by DS2 providers, given its ability of rapid, delocalised and flexible manufacturing. From a literature review and interviews with industrial and academic experts, it is apparent that there is a lack of research on AM applications in DS2. This paper’s contribution is represented by the following which has been validated extensively by industrial and academic experts: (1) DS2 current practices conceptual models, (2) a framework for AM implementation and (3) preliminary results of a next generation DS2 based on AM. To carry out the research, a Soft System Methodology was adopted. Results from the research increased the confidence of the disruptive potential of AM within the DS2 context. The main benefits outlined are (1) an increased support to the availability given a reduced response time, (2) reduced supply chain complexity given only supplies of raw materials such as powder and wire, (3) reduced platform inventory levels, providing more space and (4) reduced delivery time of the component as the AM can be located near to the point of use. Nevertheless, more research has to be carried out to quantify the benefits outlined. This requirement provides the basis for the future research work which consists in developing a software tool (based on the framework) for experimentation purpose which is able to dynamically simulate different scenarios and outline data on availability, cost and time of service delivered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22


  1. Apte A, Rendon R (2009) A diagnostic approach to weapon system lifecycle support: the phalanx close-in weapon system. Int J Def Acquis Manag 2:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASTM (2013) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies (No. F2792-12a). ASTM Int

  3. Busachi A, Erkoyuncu J, Colegrove P (2015a) A review of cost modelling of additive manufacturing for defence support services. J Manuf Sci Technol

  4. Busachi A, Erkoyuncu J, Colegrove P, Martina F, Ding J (2015b) Designing a WAAM based manufacturing system for defence applications. Proc CIRP 37:48–53. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Checkland PB (2001) Soft Systems Methodology. Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  6. Erkoyuncu et al (2015) Opportunities for additive manufacturing to address component obsolescence challenges. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ivanova O, Williams C, Campbell T (2013) Additive manufacturing (AM) and nanotechnology: promises and challenges. Rapid Prototyp J 19:353–364. doi:10.1108/RPJ-12-2011-0127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwata C, Mavris D (2013) Object-oriented discrete event simulation modeling environment for aerospace vehicle maintenance and logistics process. Proc Comput Sci 16:187–196. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khajavi SH, Partanen J, Holmström J (2014) Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain. Comput Ind 65:50–63. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2013.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. MBDA (2015) Missile systems, defence systems—MBDA missiles. (WWW Document). http://www.mbda-systems.com/. Accessed 12 June 2015

  11. Pérès F, Noyes D (2006) Envisioning e-logistics developments: making spare parts in situ and on demand. Comput Ind 57:490–503. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2006.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. RAND (2013) Future technology landscapes. RAND Europe, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. REF (2015) REF rapid equipping force—United states army (WWW Document). http://www.ref.army.mil/. Accessed 12 June 2015

  14. Robinson S (2004) Simulation: the practice of model development and use. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  15. US Army, 2015. The official home page of the United States Army, The United States Army (WWW Document). http://www.army.mil/. Accessed 12 June 201515

Download references


The Authors thank Dr. Richard Drake and Dr. Chris Watts of Babcock International for their contribution. This research is performed within the EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in Through-Life Engineering Services, Grant Number EP/1033246/1.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Busachi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Busachi, A., Erkoyuncu, J., Colegrove, P. et al. Additive manufacturing applications in Defence Support Services: current practices and framework for implementation. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9, 657–674 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0585-9

Download citation


  • Additive manufacturing
  • Defence Support Service systems
  • Systems science