Additive manufacturing applications in Defence Support Services: current practices and framework for implementation

  • Alessandro Busachi
  • John Erkoyuncu
  • Paul Colegrove
  • Richard Drake
  • Chris Watts
  • Stephen Wilding
Original Article
  • 198 Downloads

Abstract

This research investigates through a systems approach, “Additive Manufacturing” (AM) applications in “Defence Support Services” (DS2). AM technology is gaining increasing interest by DS2 providers, given its ability of rapid, delocalised and flexible manufacturing. From a literature review and interviews with industrial and academic experts, it is apparent that there is a lack of research on AM applications in DS2. This paper’s contribution is represented by the following which has been validated extensively by industrial and academic experts: (1) DS2 current practices conceptual models, (2) a framework for AM implementation and (3) preliminary results of a next generation DS2 based on AM. To carry out the research, a Soft System Methodology was adopted. Results from the research increased the confidence of the disruptive potential of AM within the DS2 context. The main benefits outlined are (1) an increased support to the availability given a reduced response time, (2) reduced supply chain complexity given only supplies of raw materials such as powder and wire, (3) reduced platform inventory levels, providing more space and (4) reduced delivery time of the component as the AM can be located near to the point of use. Nevertheless, more research has to be carried out to quantify the benefits outlined. This requirement provides the basis for the future research work which consists in developing a software tool (based on the framework) for experimentation purpose which is able to dynamically simulate different scenarios and outline data on availability, cost and time of service delivered.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Defence Support Service systems Systems science 

References

  1. Apte A, Rendon R (2009) A diagnostic approach to weapon system lifecycle support: the phalanx close-in weapon system. Int J Def Acquis Manag 2:1–16Google Scholar
  2. ASTM (2013) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies (No. F2792-12a). ASTM IntGoogle Scholar
  3. Busachi A, Erkoyuncu J, Colegrove P (2015a) A review of cost modelling of additive manufacturing for defence support services. J Manuf Sci TechnolGoogle Scholar
  4. Busachi A, Erkoyuncu J, Colegrove P, Martina F, Ding J (2015b) Designing a WAAM based manufacturing system for defence applications. Proc CIRP 37:48–53. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Checkland PB (2001) Soft Systems Methodology. Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  6. Erkoyuncu et al (2015) Opportunities for additive manufacturing to address component obsolescence challenges. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  7. Ivanova O, Williams C, Campbell T (2013) Additive manufacturing (AM) and nanotechnology: promises and challenges. Rapid Prototyp J 19:353–364. doi:10.1108/RPJ-12-2011-0127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iwata C, Mavris D (2013) Object-oriented discrete event simulation modeling environment for aerospace vehicle maintenance and logistics process. Proc Comput Sci 16:187–196. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khajavi SH, Partanen J, Holmström J (2014) Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain. Comput Ind 65:50–63. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2013.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MBDA (2015) Missile systems, defence systems—MBDA missiles. (WWW Document). http://www.mbda-systems.com/. Accessed 12 June 2015
  11. Pérès F, Noyes D (2006) Envisioning e-logistics developments: making spare parts in situ and on demand. Comput Ind 57:490–503. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2006.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. RAND (2013) Future technology landscapes. RAND Europe, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. REF (2015) REF rapid equipping force—United states army (WWW Document). http://www.ref.army.mil/. Accessed 12 June 2015
  14. Robinson S (2004) Simulation: the practice of model development and use. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  15. US Army, 2015. The official home page of the United States Army, The United States Army (WWW Document). http://www.army.mil/. Accessed 12 June 201515

Copyright information

© The Society for Reliability Engineering, Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM), India and The Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Busachi
    • 1
  • John Erkoyuncu
    • 1
  • Paul Colegrove
    • 1
  • Richard Drake
    • 2
  • Chris Watts
    • 2
  • Stephen Wilding
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Aerospace Transport and Manufacturing (SATM)Cranfield UniversityCranfieldUK
  2. 2.Defence Systems TechnologyBabcock InternationalBristolUK

Personalised recommendations