Performance evaluation of various MANET routing protocols for adaptability in VANET environment

  • Kamlesh Chandra PurohitEmail author
  • Sushil Chandra Dimri
  • Sanjay Jasola
Original Article


Vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) is emerging as one of the challenging research area because of the heavy dependency of human being into vehicles which tends to develop an intelligent transport system. VANET is treated as an extension of mobile ad hoc network (MANET) due to its behavior and its working mode. VANET is emerging as a new powerful tool to provide safety and security to the human beings during the time of traveling from one place to another. Routing is one of the challenging tasks for both MANET and VANET due to the frequent change in the topology. In this paper, we are evaluating the adaptability of existing MANET routing protocols for VANET. This paper analyze that what is the impact the vehicle density and speed on the packet delivery ratio, normalized routing load, average end-to-end delay, average throughput, average path length and average loss rate, which will help to design a new routing protocol or to have some improvement in the existing routing protocols.


VANET ITS MANET Routing Topology Mobility Density Packet delivery ratio End_to_End delay Throughput Routing-load and path-length 


  1. Al-Sultan S, Al-Doori MM, Al-Bayatti AH, Zedan H (2014) A comprehensive survey on vehicular ad hoc network. J Netw Comput Appl 37:380–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arshad W, Javaid N, Khan RD, Ilahi M, Qasim U, Khan ZA (2013) Modeling and simulating network connectivity in routing protocols for MANETs and VANETs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.0757
  3. Broch J, Johnson DB, Maltz DA (1998) The dynamic source routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networksGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaurasia BK, Tomar RS, Verma S, Tomar GS (2012) Suitability of MANET routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks. In: 2012 international conference on Communication systems and network technologies (CSNT), pp 334–338Google Scholar
  5. Clausen T, Jacquet P (2003) Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR). pp 2070–1721Google Scholar
  6. Darwish T, Bakar KA (2015) Traffic density estimation in vehicular ad hoc networks: a review. Ad Hoc Netw 24:337–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fall K, Varadhan K (2003) The ns-2 manual. The VINT Project, UC Berkeley, LBL, and Xerox PARCGoogle Scholar
  8. Friginal J, de Andres D, Ruiz J-C, Martinez M (2015) A survey of evaluation platforms for ad hoc routing protocols: a resilience perspective. Comput Netw 75:395–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guangyu P, Mario G, Tsu-Wei C (2000) Fisheye state routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of ICC, pp 71–78Google Scholar
  10. Haas ZJ, Pearlman MR, Samar P (2002) The zone routing protocol (ZRP) for ad hoc networks.
  11. Jacquet P, Muhlethaler P, Clausen T, Laouiti A, Qayyum A, Viennot L (2001) Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks. In: Technology for the 21st century: proceedings of the multi topic conference, 2001. IEEE (INMIC’2001). IEEE International, pp 62–68Google Scholar
  12. Johnson DB, Maltz DA (1996) Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In: Imielinski T, Korth H (eds) Mobile computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar D, Verma P (2015) Routing protocols for MANET, VANET and AANET: a survey. IJITR 3:1953–1956Google Scholar
  14. Li P, Fang Y, Li J (2010) Throughput, delay, and mobility in wireless ad hoc networks. In: 2010 proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  15. Mahajan A, Potnis N, Gopalan K, Wang A (2006) Evaluation of mobility models for vehicular ad-hoc network simulations. In: IEEE international workshop on next generation wireless networks (WoNGeN)Google Scholar
  16. Marina MK, Das SR (2001) On-demand multipath distance vector routing in ad hoc networks. In: Ninth international conference on network protocols, 2001. pp 14–23Google Scholar
  17. Maurya AK, Singh D (2010) Simulation based performance comparison of AODV, FSR and ZRP routing protocols in MANET. Int J Comput Appl (0975-8887), vol 12Google Scholar
  18. Murthy S, Garcia-Luna-Aceves JJ (1996) An efficient routing protocol for wireless networks. Mobile Netw Appl 1:183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Perkins CE, Bhagwat P (1994) Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. In: ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review, pp 234–244Google Scholar
  20. Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S (2003) Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing, pp 2070–1721Google Scholar
  21. Rahman AHA, Zukarnain ZA (2009) Performance comparison of AODV, DSDV and I-DSDV routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks. Eur J Sci Res 31:566–576Google Scholar
  22. Raju CS, Sailaja M, Balaswamy C (2013) Adaptability of MANET routing protocols for VANETS. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng 2:2823–2829Google Scholar
  23. Ranjan P, Ahirwar KK (2011) Comparative study of VANET and MANET routing protocols. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced computing and communication technologies (ACCT’2011), pp 517–523Google Scholar
  24. Sharef BT, Alsaqour RA, Ismail M (2014) Vehicular communication ad hoc routing protocols: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl 40:363–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singh D, Maurya AK, Sarje AK (2011) Comparative performance analysis of LANMAR, LAR1, DYMO and ZRP routing protocols in MANET using random waypoint mobility model. In: 2011 3rd international conference on electronics computer technology (ICECT), pp 62–66Google Scholar
  26. Sood M, Kanwar S (2014) Clustering in MANET and VANET: a survey. In: International conference on circuits, systems, communication and information technology applications (CSCITA), pp 375–380Google Scholar
  27. Vijayalakshmi K, Chezian RM (2015) Performance evaluation of ad-hoc protocols in MANET and VANET. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng 4:208–212Google Scholar
  28. Beijar N (2002) Zone routing protocol (ZRP). Networking Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  29. Sultana S, Raj CV (2014) Packet delivery ratio and normalized routing load analysis on ad hoc network protocols. Appl Eng Technol Sci 6:212–216Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Reliability Engineering, Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM), India and The Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graphic Era UniversityDehradunIndia
  2. 2.Graphic Era Hill UniversityDehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations