Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human reliability assessment (HRA) in maintenance of production process: a case study

  • Case Study
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human reliability makes a considerable contribution to the maintenance performance, safety, and cost-efficiency of any production process. To improve human reliability, the causes of human errors should be identified and the probability of human errors should be quantified. Analysis of human error is very case-specific; the context of the field should be taken into account. The aim of this study is to identify the causes of human errors and improve human reliability in maintenance activities in the cable manufacturing industry. The central thrust of this paper is to employ the three most common HRA techniques—human error assessment and reduction technique, standardized plant analysis risk-human reliability, and Bayesian network—for estimating human error probabilities and then to check the consistency of the results obtained. The case study results demonstrated that the main causes of human error during maintenance activities are time pressure, lack of experience, and poor procedure. Moreover, the probabilities of human error, obtained by employing the three techniques, are similar and consistent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AgenaRisk (2015) Agena—Bayesian network and simulation software for risk analysis and decision support. http://www.agenarisk.com/

  • Akyuz E, Celik M (2015) Computer-based human reliability analysis onboard ships. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 195:1823–1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostolakis G (1985) On the assessment of human error rates using operational experience. Reliab Eng 12:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayele YZ, Barabady J, Droguett EL (2015) Risk assessment of Arctic drilling waste management operations based on Bayesian Networks. Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems: ESREL 2015. CRC Press, Zurich, pp 1907–1915

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baraldi P, Conti M, Librizzi M, Zio E, Podofillini L, Dang V (2009) A Bayesian network model for dependence assessment in human reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL, 2009, pp 223–230

  • Bell J, Holroyd J (2009) Review of human reliability assessment methods. Health and Safety Laboratory, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertolini M (2007) Assessment of human reliability factors: a fuzzy cognitive maps approach. Int J Ind Ergon 37:405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring RL, Gertman DI (2005) Advancing usability evaluation through human reliability analysis. In: Proceedings of HCI international 2005

  • Brooker P (2011) Experts, Bayesian Belief Networks, rare events and aviation risk estimates. Saf Sci 49:1142–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calixto E (2012) Gas and oil reliability engineering: modeling and analysis. Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillia F, Giardina M (2013) Analysis of operator human errors in hydrogen refuelling stations: comparison between human rate assessment techniques. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:1166–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čepin M (2008) DEPEND-HRA—a method for consideration of dependency in human reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:1452–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudian K, Wu J-S, Apostolakis G (1994) Incorporating organizational factors into risk assessment through the analysis of work processes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 45:85–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Felice F, Petrillo A, Carlomusto A, Ramondo A (2012) Human reliability analysis: a review of the state of the art. IRACST Int J Res Manag Technol (IJRMT)

  • De Galizia A, Duval C, Serdet E, Weber P, Simon C, Lung B (2015) Advanced investigation of HRA methods for probabilistic assessment of human barriers efficiency in complex systems for a given organisational and environmental context. In: International topical meeting on probabilistic safety assessment and analysis, PSA 2015

  • Deacon T, Amyotte P, Khan F, Mackinnon S (2013) A framework for human error analysis of offshore evacuations. Saf Sci 51:319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon B (1989) Human errors: a review. Microelectron Reliab 29:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embrey D, Kontogiannis T, Green M (1994) Guidelines for reducing human error in process operations. Centre for Chemical Process Safety, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca RA, Alvim ACM, Frutuoso E, Melo PFF, Alvarenga MAB (2013) A THERP/ATHEANA analysis of the latent operator error in leaving EFW valves closed in the TMI-2 accident. Sci Technol Nucl Install. doi: 10.1155/2013/787196

  • Groth KM, Swiler LP (2013) Bridging the gap between HRA research and HRA practice: a Bayesian network version of SPAR-H. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 115:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (1998) Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim MC, Seong PH, Hollnagel E (2006) A probabilistic approach for determining the control mode in CREAM. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan B (1992) Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Part 2: detailed comparison of techniques. Appl Ergon 23:371–381

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan B (1994) A guide to practical human reliability assessment. CRC Press, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan B (1996) The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques—THERP, HEART and JHEDI: Part 1—technique descriptions and validation issues. Appl Ergon 27:359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan B (1997) The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques—THERP, HEART and JHEDI: Part iii—practical aspects of the usage of the techniques. Appl Ergon 28:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan B, Ainsworth LK (1992) A guide to task analysis: the task analysis working group. CRC Press, United Kingdom

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Konstandinidou M, Nivollianitoi Z, Kiranoudis C, Markatos N (2006) A fuzzy modeling application of CREAM methodology for human reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:706–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korb KB, Nicholson AE (2010) Bayesian artificial intelligence. CRC Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C-J, Lee KJ (2006) Application of Bayesian network to the probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear waste disposal. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:515–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons M, Adams S, Woloshynowych M, Vincent C (2004) Human reliability analysis in healthcare: a review of techniques. Int J Risk Saf Med 16:223–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannan S (2012) Lees’ loss prevention in the process industries: Hazard identification, assessment and control. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquez D, Neil M, Fenton N (2010) Improved reliability modeling using Bayesian networks and dynamic discretization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95:412–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod RW (2015) Designing for human reliability: human factors engineering in the oil, gas, and process industries. Gulf Professional Publishing, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MA, Booker JM (2001) Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment: a practical guide, SIAM edition. American Statistical Association and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 3600 University City Science Center, Philadelphia, USA

  • Mihajlovic V, Petkovic M (2001) Dynamic Bayesian networks: a state of the art. University of Twente, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Moieni P, Spurgin A, Singh A (1994) Advances in human reliability analysis methodology. Part I: frameworks, models and data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 44:27–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noroozi A, Khakzad N, Khan F, Mackinnon S, Abbassi R (2013) The role of human error in risk analysis: application to pre-and post-maintenance procedures of process facilities. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 119:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park KS (1987) Fuzzy apportionment of system reliability. IEEE Trans Reliab 36:129–132

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Park KS, Jung KT (1996) Considering performance shaping factors in situation-specific human error probabilities. Int J Ind Ergon 18:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podofillini L, Dang V, Zio E, Baraldi P, Librizzi M (2010) Using expert models in human reliability analysis—a dependence assessment method based on fuzzy logic. Risk Anal 30:1277–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raouf A, Duffuaa S, Ben-Daya M, Dhillon B, Liu Y (2006) Human error in maintenance: a review. J Qual Maint Eng 12:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Kumar R (2015) Evaluation of human error probability of disc brake unit assembly and wheel set maintenance of railway bogie. Procedia Manuf 3:3041–3048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain AD (1990) Human reliability analysis: need, status, trends and limitations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 29:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain AD, Guttmann HE (1983) Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report. Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Adams S, Kirwan B (1997) Human reliability data requirements. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 6:318–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trucco P, Cagno E, Ruggeri F, Grande O (2008) A Bayesian Belief Network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: a case study in maritime transportation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:845–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson I (1985) Review of human factors in reliability and risk assessment. IChemE Symposium Series No. Assess Control of Major Hazards 93:323–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber P, Medina-Oliva G, Simon C, Iung B (2012) Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25:671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J (1988) A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance. Human Factors and Power Plants, 1988. In: IEEE fourth conference on Conference record for 1988. IEEE, pp 436–450

  • Williamson J (2004) Bayesian nets and causality: philosophical and computational foundations. Oxford University Press, UK

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zio E, Baraldi P, Librizzi M, Podofillini L, Dang VN (2009) A fuzzy set-based approach for modeling dependence among human errors. Fuzzy Set Syst 160:1947–1964

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden

    Mojgan Aalipour

  2. Department of Engineering and Safety, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

    Yonas Zewdu Ayele & Abbas Barabadi

Authors
  1. Mojgan Aalipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yonas Zewdu Ayele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abbas Barabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Barabadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aalipour, M., Ayele, Y.Z. & Barabadi, A. Human reliability assessment (HRA) in maintenance of production process: a case study. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7, 229–238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0453-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0453-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation