Abstract
Mead is an ancient alcoholic beverage produced through the fermentation of a diluted solution of honey. Due to the peculiar and varied composition of honey, mead production faces several problems, such as slow or stuck fermentations mainly due to the low nitrogen concentration, lack of uniformity of the final product and the production of unpleasant aromas. In this context, this work aimed to select low nitrogen-demand yeast strains and evaluate their potential for the production of mead. Therefore, among 21 commercial wine yeast strains, 5 were selected based on their fermentative behavior at low assimilable nitrogen concentrations. The selected strains were further evaluated for their contributions in meads produced with limited nitrogen availability, and the results showed significant differences on some physicochemical parameters like biomass production, residual sugars, glycerol concentration, and fermentative rate. Moreover, meads obtained with selected strains differed in the concentration of several volatile compounds. The volatile compounds concentration and the principal component analysis based on odor activity values allowed separating strains into three groups. In general, S. cerevisiae var bayanus strains (QA23, Spark, and AWRI-R2) were the largest producers of aromatic compounds, particularly those with floral and fruity descriptors. The selection of yeast strains with low nitrogen-demand and different volatile compounds production can be explored by mead makers to limit fermentation problems and obtain characteristic products.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonelli A, Castellari L, Zambonelli C, Carnacini A (1999) Yeast influence on volatile composition of wines. J Agr Food Chem 47:1139–1144. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9807317
Ball DW (2007) The chemical composition of honey. J Chem Educ 84:1643–1646. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p1643
Brice C, Sanchez I, Tesnière C, Blondina B (2014) Assessing the mechanisms responsible for differences between nitrogen requirements of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts in alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1330–1339. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03856-13
Calleja A, Falqué E (2005) Volatile composition of Mencıa wines. Food Chem 90:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.04.013
Caridi A, Fuda S, Postorino S, Russo M, Sidari R (1999) Selection of Saccharomyces sensu stricto for mead production. Food Technol Biotechnol 37:203–207
Carrau F, Medina K, Boido E, Farina L, Gaggero C, Dellacassa E, Versini G, Henschke PA (2005) De novo synthesis of monoterpenes by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett 243:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.050
Cavalcante da Silva SMP, de Carvalho CAL, Sodré GDS, Estevinho LM (2018) Production and characterization of mead from the honey of Melipona scutellaris stingless bees. J Inst Brew 124:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.485
da Silva PM, Gauche C, Gonzaga LV, Costa ACO, Fett R (2016) Honey: chemical composition, stability and authenticity. Food Chem 196:309–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.051
Felipe ALD, Souza CO, Santos LF, Cestari A (2019) Synthesis and characterization of mead: from the past to the future and development of a new fermentative route. J Food Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03968-3
Galanakis CM, Kordulis C, Kanellaki M, Koutinas AA, Bekatorou A, Lycourghiotis A (2012) Effect of pressure and temperature on alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on γ-alumina pellets. Bioresour Technol 114:492–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.010
Gardner JM, Poole K, Jiranek V (2002) Practical significance of relative assimilable nitrogen requirements of yeast: a preliminary study of fermentation performance and liberation of H2S. Aust J Grape Wine Res 8:175–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2002.tb00253.x
Gomes T, Dias T, Cadavez V, Verdial J, Morais JS, Ramalhosa E, Estevinho LM (2015) Influence of sweetness and ethanol content on mead acceptability. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 65:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjfns-2015-0006
Guth H (1997) Identification of character impact odorants of different white varieties. J Agric Food Chem 45:3022–3026. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9608433
Iglesias A, Pascoal A, Choupina AB, Carvalho CA, Feás X, Estevinho LM (2014) Developments in the fermentation process and quality improvement strategies for mead production. Molecules 19:12577–12590. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules190812577
Lambrechts MG, Pretorius IS (2000) Yeast and its importance to wine aroma-a review. S Afr J Enol Vitic 21:97–129
Lemos Junior WJF, Viel A, Bovo B, Carlot M, Giacomini A, Corich V (2017) Saccharomyces cerevisiae vineyard strains have different nitrogen requirements that affect their fermentation performances. Lett Appl Microbiol 65:381–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12798
Liu PT, Lu L, Duan CQ, Yan GL (2016) The contribution of indigenous non-Saccharomyces wine yeast to improved aromatic quality of Cabernet Sauvignon wines by spontaneous fermentation. LWT-Food Sci Technol 71:356–363
Martínez-Moreno R, Morales P, Gonzales R, Mas A, Beltran G (2012) Biomass production and alcoholic fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a function of nitrogen source. FEMS Yeast Res 12:477–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00802.x
Mazauric JP, Salmon JM (2005) Interactions between yeast lees and wine polyphenols during simulation of wine aging: I. Analysis of remnant polyphenolic compounds in the resulting wines. J Agric Food Chem 53:5647–5653. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf050308f
Nieuwoudt H, Prior B, Pretorius I, Bauer F (2002) Glycerol and wine quality: fact and fiction. Wynboer 9:96–101
OIV (2016) International oenological codex. https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/5119/code-2017-en.pdf. Acessed 15 Oct 2019
Pereira AP, Dias T, Andrade J, Ramalhosa E, Estevinho LM (2009) Mead production: selection and characterization assays of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Food Chem Toxicol 47:2057–2063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.05.028
Pereira AP, Mendes-Ferreira A, Oliveira JM, Estevinho LM, Mendes-Faia A (2013) High-cell-density fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the optimization of mead production. Food Microbiol 33:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.09.006
Pereira AP, Mendes-Ferreira A, Oliveira JM, Estevinho LM, Mendes-Faia A (2015) Mead production: effect of nitrogen supplementation on growth, fermentation profile and aroma formation by yeasts in mead fermentation. J Inst Brew 121:122–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.184
Pereira AP, Oliveira JM, Mendes-Ferreira A, Estevinho LM, Mendes-Faia A (2017) Mead and other fermented beverages. In: Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, pp 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63666-9.00014-5
Pretorius IS (2000) Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16:675–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0061(20000615)16:8%3c675:AID-YEA585%3e3.0.CO;2-B
Pretorius IS (2003) The genetic improvement of wine yeasts. In: Arora DK (ed) Handbook of fungal biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca Ratin, pp 373–415
Ramalhosa E, Gomes T, Pereira AP, Dias T, Estevinho LM (2011) Mead production: tradition versus modernity. Adv Food Nutr Res 63:101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384927-4.00004-X
Ribéreau-Gayon P, Dubourdieu D, Donèche B, Lonvaud A (2006) Handbook of enology, vol 1: the microbiology of wine and vinifications. Wiley, Hoboken
Saerens SM, Delvaux FR, Verstrepen KJ, Thevelein JM (2010) Production and biological function of volatile esters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Biotechnol 3:165–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00106.x
Santos AAD, Deoti JR, Müller G, Dário MG, Stambuk BU, Alves Junior SL (2017) Microwell plate-based method for the determination of reducing sugars with the DNS reagent. Braz J Food Technol 20:e2015113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.11315
Swiegers JH, Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA, Pretorius I (2005) Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour. Aust J Grape Wine Res 11:139–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x
Vidrih R, Hribar J (2016) Mead: the oldest alcoholic beverage. In: Kristbergsson K, Oliveira J (eds) Traditional foods. Integrating Food science and engineering knowledge into the food chain, vol 10. Springer, Boston, pp 325–338
Welke JE, Zanus M, Lazzarotto M, Zini CA (2014) Quantitative analysis of headspace volatile compounds using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and their contribution to the aroma of Chardonnay wine. Food Res Int 59:85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.02.002
Xiao Z, Zhou X, Niu Y, Yu D, Zhu J, Zhu G (2015) Optimization and application of headspace-solid-phase micro-extraction coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the determination of volatile compounds in cherry wines. J Chromatogr B 978:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.12.006
Zapata J, Mateo-Vivaracho L, Lopez R, Ferreira V (2012) Automated and quantitative headspace in-tube extraction for the accurate determination of highly volatile compounds from wines and beers. J Chromatogr A 1230:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.01.037
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination—Brazil (CAPES)—Financial Code 001 and University of Caxias do Sul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwarz, L.V., Marcon, A.R., Delamare, A.P.L. et al. Selection of low nitrogen demand yeast strains and their impact on the physicochemical and volatile composition of mead. J Food Sci Technol 57, 2840–2851 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04316-6
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04316-6