Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 1988–1996 | Cite as

The quality of rice wine influenced by the crystal structure of rice starch

  • Qi Lai
  • Yihua Li
  • Yanwen Wu
  • Jie OuyangEmail author
Original Article


Normal rice wine (NRW) and waxy rice wine (WRW) were fermented to study the relationship between the structure of starch as well as the taste and texture of rice wine. The total starch content of NRW decreased to 21.2%, and that of WRW decreased to 15.6%. The water-soluble sugar content of NRW increased to 169.3, and that of WRW increased to 194.4 mg/g. The ethanol content of NRW increased to 6.5%, and that of WRW increased to 8.9%. These changes indicated that WRW exhibited higher quality than NRW. Sweetness was negatively correlated with total starch content and positively correlated with ethanol content. Starch molecules were degraded by enzymolysis, thereby enhancing crystallinity. The size of starch particle was negatively correlated with crystallinity, whereas the chewiness and gumminess of vinasse (fermented rice grains) were positively correlated with the size of starch particle and negatively correlated with crystallinity. The higher degrees of chewiness and gumminess of vinasse render the texture of WRW superior to that of NRW. The results indicated that WRW is superior to NRW in taste and texture because of the difference in starch structure.


Rice wine Starch Texture Crystallinity Short-range molecular order 



The authors are grateful for support from Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2015ZCQ-SW-04), the Beijing Forestry University Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students (No. S201610022053), and Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Base Cultivation and Development Projects (IG201710C1).


  1. AOAC (2001) Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Asaoka M, Okuno K, Fuwa H (1985) Effect of environmental temperature at the milky stage on amylose content and fine structure of amylopectin of waxy and nonwaxy endosperm starches of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agric Biol Chem 49:373–379Google Scholar
  3. de la Hera E, Gomez M, Rosell CM (2013) Particle size distribution of rice flour affecting the starch enzymatic hydrolysis and hydration properties. Carbohydr Polym 98:421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dung NTP, Rombouts FM, Nout MJR (2006) Functionality of selected strains of moulds and yeasts from Vietnamese rice wine starters. Food Microbiol 23:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gomand SV, Lamberts L, Derde LJ, Goesaert H, Vandeputte GE, Goderis B, Visser RGF, Delcour JA (2010) Structural properties and gelatinisation characteristics of potato and cassava starches and mutants thereof. Food Hydrocoll 24:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grandy AS, Erich MS, Porter GA (2000) Suitability of the anthrone-sulfuric acid reagent for determining water soluble carbohydrates in soil water extracts. Soil Biol Biochem 32:725–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gusakov AV, Kondratyeva EG, Sinitsyn AP (2011) Comparison of two methods for assaying reducing sugars in the determination of carbohydrase activities. Int J Anal Chem. Google Scholar
  8. Jiao AQ, Xu XM, Jin ZY (2017) Research progress on the brewing techniques of new-type rice wine. Food Chem 215:508–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaur P, Pal P, Virdi AS, Kaur A, Singh N, Mahajan G (2016) Protein and starch characteristics of milled rice from different cultivars affected by transplantation date. J Food Sci Technol 53:3186–3196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kohyama K, Matsuki J, Yasui T, Sasaki T (2004) A differential thermal analysis of the gelatinization and retrogradation of wheat starches with different amylopectin chain lengths. Carbohydr Polym 58:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li HY, Prakash S, Nicholson TM, Fitzgerald MA, Gilbert RG (2016) Instrumental measurement of cooked rice texture by dynamic rheological testing and its relation to the fine structure of rice starch. Carbohydr Polym 146:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luo ZG, Shi YC (2012) Preparation of acetylated waxy, normal, and high-amylose maize starches with intermediate degrees of substitution in aqueous solution and their properties. J Agric Food Chem 60:9468–9475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meng LP, Liu LB, Zhou CZ, Pan SL, Zhai XY, Jiang CJ, Guo Y, Ji Z, Chi JF, Peng F, Guo HY (2016) Polyphenols and polypeptides in Chinese rice wine inhibit homocysteine-induced proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cardiovasc Pharm 67:482–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pal P, Singh N, Kaur P, Kaur A, Virdi AS, Parmar N (2016) Comparison of composition, protein, pasting, and phenolic compounds of brown rice and germinated brown rice from different cultivars. Cereal Chem 93:584–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Presečki AV, Blažević ZF, Vasić-Rački D (2013) Complete starch hydrolysis by the synergistic action of amylase and glucoamylase: impact of calcium ions. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36:1555–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Qiao DL, Yu L, Liu HS, Zou W, Xie FW, Simon G, Petinakis E, Shen ZQ, Chen L (2016) Insights into the hierarchical structure and digestion rate of alkali-modulated starches with different amylose contents. Carbohydr Polym 144:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sevenou O, Hill SE, Farhat IA, Mitchell JR (2002) Organisation of the external region of the starch granule as determined by infrared spectroscopy. Int J Biol Macromol 31:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shen F, Yang DT, Ying YB, Li BB, Zheng YF, Jiang T (2012) Discrimination between Shaoxing wines and other Chinese rice wines by near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:786–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Singh N, Kaur L, Sandhu KS, Kaur J, Nishinari K (2006) Relationships between physicochemical, morphological, thermal, rheological properties of rice starches. Food Hydrocoll 20:532–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Singh N, Nakaura Y, Inouchi N, Nishinari K (2007) Fine structure, thermal and viscoelastic properties of starches separated from Indica rice cultivars. Stärke 59:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Syahariza ZA, Sar S, Hasjim J, Tizzotti MJ, Gilbert RG (2013) The importance of amylose and amylopectin fine structures for starch digestibility in cooked rice grains. Food Chem 136:742–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tang HJ, Ando H, Watanabe K, Takeda Y, Mitsunaga T (2001) Physicochemical properties and structure of large, medium and small granule starches in fractions of normal barley endosperm. Carbohydr Res 330:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tang HJ, Watanabe K, Mitsunaga T (2002) Structure and functionality of large, medium and small granule starches in normal and waxy barley endosperms. Carbohydr Polym 49:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van Soest JJG, Tournois H, de Wit D, Vliegenthart JFG (1995) Short-range structure in (partially) crystalline potato starch determined with attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform IR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 279:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vandeputte GE, Vermeylen R, Geeroms J, Delcour JA (2003) Rice starches. I. Structural aspects provide insight into crystallinity characteristics and gelatinisation behaviour of granular starch. J Cereal Sci 38:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang SJ, Li PY, Yu JL, Guo P, Wang S (2017) Multi-scale structures and functional properties of starches from indica hybrid, japonica and waxy rice. Int J Biol Macromol 102:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wei CX, Qin FL, Zhou WD, Xu B, Chen C, Chen YF, Wang YP, Gu MH, Liu QQ (2011) Comparison of the crystalline properties and structural changes of starches from high-amylose transgenic rice and its wild type during heating. Food Chem 128:645–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiao ZZ, Storms R, Tsang A (2006) A quantitative starch-iodine method for measuring alpha-amylase and glucoamylase activities. Anal Biochem 351:146–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang YJ, Xia YJ, Wang GQ, Yu JS, Ai LZ (2017) Effect of mixed yeast starter on volatile flavor compounds in Chinese rice wine during different brewing stages. LWT Food Sci Technol 78:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yoshizaki Y, Susuki T, Takamine K, Tamaki H, Ito K, Sameshima Y (2010) Characterization of glucoamylase and α-amylase from Monascus anka: enhanced production of α-amylase in red koji. J Biosci Bioeng 110:670–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yu SF, Ma Y, Menager L, Sun DW (2012) Physiochemical properties of starch and flour from different rice cultivars. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:626–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang TX, Li XX, Chen L, Situ WB (2016) Digestibility and structural changes of waxy rice starch during the fermentation process for waxy rice vinasse. Food Hydrocoll 57:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao R, Wu X, Seabourn BW, Bean SR, Guan L, Shi YC, Wilson JD, Madl R, Wang D (2009) Comparison of waxy vs. nonwaxy wheats in fuel ethanol fermentation. Cereal Chem 86:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhou WZ, Yang J, Hong Y, Liu GL, Zheng JL, Gu ZB, Zhang P (2015) Impact of amylose content on starch physicochemical properties in transgenic sweet potato. Carbohydr Polym 122:417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhu J, Zhang SY, Zhang BJ, Qiao DL, Pu HY, Liu SY, Li L (2017) Structural features and thermal property of propionylated starches with different amylose/amylopectin ratio. Int J Biol Macromol 97:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Science and Engineering, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Forest Food Process and SafetyBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Center for Physical and Chemical Analysis, Beijing Food Safety Analysis and Testing Engineering Research CenterBeijing Academy of Science and TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations