Importance of the gastrointestinal life cycle of Bacillus for probiotic functionality
Bacillus spp. are widely used in animal production for their probiotic properties. In many animal species, feed supplementation with specific Bacillus strains can provide numerous benefits including improvement in digestibility, the gut microbiota and immune modulation, and growth performance. Bacilli are fed to animals as spores that can sustain the harsh feed processing and long storage. However, the spores are metabolically quiescent and it is widely accepted that probiotics should be in a metabolically active state to perform certain probiotic functions like secretion of antimicrobial compounds and enzymes, synthesis of short chain fatty acids, and competition for essential nutrients. These functions should become active in the host gastrointestinal tract (GIT) soon after digestion of spores in order to contribute to microbiota and host metabolism. Considering that bacterial spores are metabolically dormant and many health benefits are provided by vegetative cells, it is of particular interest to discuss the life cycle of Bacillus in animal GIT. This review aims to capture the main characteristics of spores and vegetative cells and to discuss the latest knowledge in the life cycle of beneficial Bacillus in various intestinal environments. Furthermore, we review how the life cycle may influence probiotic functions of Bacillus and their benefits for human and animal health.
KeywordsBacillus Spore Vegetative cells Germination Probiotic Gastrointestinal tract
The authors would like to express their thanks to Kirsty Gibbs and Laura Payling from DuPont Industrial Biosciences for review and comments on the manuscript.
- Bernlohr RW, Leitzmann C (1969) Control of sporulation. In: Gould GW, Hurst A (eds) The bacterial spore. Academic Press, London, pp 183–213Google Scholar
- Ceuppens S, Uyttendaele M, Drieskens K, Heyndrickx M, Rajkovic A, Boon N, Van de Wiele T (2012a) Survival and germination of Bacillus cereus spores without outgrowth or enterotoxin production during in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal transit. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:7698–7705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cheng BC, Wan CX, Yang SL, Yu HY, Wei H, Liu JS, Tian WH, Zeng M (2010) Detoxification of deoxynivalenol by Bacillus strains. J Food Saf 30:599–614Google Scholar
- Ciffo F, Dacarro C, Giovanetti M, Mazza PG (1987) Gastric resistance of Bacillus subtilis spores used in oral bacteriotherapy: in vitro studies. Farmacia Terapia 4:163–169Google Scholar
- González-Pastor JE (2012) Multicellularity and social behaviour in Bacillus subtilis. In: Graumann P (ed) Bacillus: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd edn. University of Freiburg, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, pp 351–376Google Scholar
- Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, Morelli L, Berni Canani R, Flint HJ, Salminen S, Calder PC, Sanders ME (2014) The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:506–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krawczyk AO, de Jong A, Omony J, Holsappel S, Wells-Bennik MH, Kuipers OP, Eijlander RT (2017). Spore heat-activation requirements and germination responses correlate with sequences of germinant receptors and with the presence of a specific spoVA2mob operon in food-borne strains of Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol 27. pii: AEM.03122-16Google Scholar
- Latorre JD, Hernandez-Velasco X, Kallapura G, Menconi A, Pumford NR, Morgan MJ, Layton SL, Bielke LR, Hargis BM, Téllez G (2014) Evaluation of germination, distribution, and persistence of Bacillus subtilis spores through the gastrointestinal tract of chickens. Poult Sci 93:1793–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen HT, Truong DH, Kouhoundé S, Ly S, Razafindralambo H, Delvigne F (2016) Biochemical engineering approaches for increasing viability and functionality of probiotic bacteria. Int J Mol Sci 17: pii: E867Google Scholar
- Pedraza-Reyes M, Ramírez-Ramírez N, Vidales-Rodríguez LE, Robleto EA (2012) Chapter 6: mechanisms of bacterial spore survival. In: Abel-Santos E (ed) Bacterial spores: current research and applications. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, p 282Google Scholar
- Piggot PJ, Coote JG (1976) Genetic aspects of bacterial endospore formation. Bacteriol Rev 40:908–962Google Scholar
- Riaz QU, Masud T (2013) Recent trends and applications of encapsulating materials for probiotic stability. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 53:231-44 Rhee KJ, Sethupathi P, Driks A, Lanning DK, Knight KL (2004) Role of commensal bacteria in development of gut-associated lymphoid tissues and preimmune antibody repertoire. J Immunol 172:1118–1124Google Scholar