Abstract
Whole grains consumption promotes health benefits, but demonstrates controversial impacts from phytic acid in meeting requirements of good health. Therefore, this study was aimed to determine the nutrient bioaccessibility and antioxidant properties of rice cultivars named “Adan” or “Bario” and deduce the nutritional impact of phytic acid. Majority of the dehusked rice in the collection showed an acceptable level of in-vitro starch digestibility and in-vitro protein digestibility, but were poor in antioxidant properties and bioaccessibility of minerals (Ca, Fe and Zn). The drawbacks identified in the rice cultivars were due to relatively high phytic acid content (2420.6 ± 94.6 mg/100 g) and low phenolic content (152.39 ± 18.84 μg GAE/g). The relationship between phytic acid content and mineral bioaccessibility was strongest in calcium (r = 0.60), followed by iron (r = 0.40) and zinc (r = 0.27). Phytic acid content did not significantly correlate with in-vitro starch digestibility and in-vitro protein digestibility but showed a weak relationship with antioxidant properties. These suggest that phytic acid could significantly impair the mineral bioaccessibility of dehusked rice, and also act as an important antioxidant in non-pigmented rice. Bario rice cultivars offered dehusked rice with wide range of in-vitro digestibility of starch and protein, and also pigmented rice as a good source of antioxidants. However, there is a need to reduce phytic acid content in dehusked rice for improved mineral bioaccessibility among Bario rice cultivars.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Bohn L, Meyer AS, Rasmussen SK (2008) Phytate: impact on environment and human nutrition. A challenge for molecular breeding. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 9:165–191. doi:10.1631/jzus.B0710640
Butsat S, Siriamornpun S (2010) Antioxidant capacities and phenolic compounds of the husk, bran and endosperm of Thai rice. Food Chem 119:606–613. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.001
Canan C, Delaroza F, Casagrande R et al (2012) Antioxidant capacity of phytic acid purified from rice bran. Acta Sci Technol 34:457–463. doi:10.4025/actascitechnol.v34i4.16358
Dipti SS, Bergman C, Indrasari SD et al (2012) The potential of rice to offer solutions for malnutrition and chronic diseases. Rice (N Y) 5:16. doi:10.1186/1939-8433-5-16
Dost K, Tokul O (2006) Determination of phytic acid in wheat and wheat products by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. Anal Chim Acta 558:22–27. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.11.035
Ekholm P, Virkki L, Ylinen M, Johansson L (2003) The effect of phytic acid and some natural chelating agents on the solubility of mineral elements in oat bran. Food Chem 80:165–170
Gbadamosi SO, Abiose SH, Aluko RE (2012) Amino acid profile, protein digestibility, thermal and functional properties of Conophor nut (Tetracarpidium conophorum) defatted flour, protein concentrate and isolates. Int J Food Sci Technol 47:731–739. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02901.x
Gilani GS, Chao WX, Cockell KA (2012) Impact of antinutritional factors in food proteins on the digestibility of protein and the bioavailability of amino acids and on protein quality. Br J Nutr 108:S315–S332. doi:10.1017/S0007114512002371
Goufo P, Trindade H (2014) Rice antioxidants: phenolic acids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, tocopherols, tocotrienols, γ-oryzanol, and phytic acid. Food Sci Nutr 2:75–104. doi:10.1002/fsn3.86
Grases F, Costa-Bauza A, Prieto RM (2006) Renal lithiasis and nutrition. Nutr J 5:23. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-5-23
IRRI (2002) Standard Evaluation System for Rice (SES). International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)
Iwai T, Takahashi M, Oda K et al (2012) Dynamic changes in the distribution of minerals in relation to phytic-acid accumulation during rice seed development. Plant Physiol 160:2007–2014. doi:10.1104/pp. 112.206573
Kies AK, De Jonge LH, Kemme PA, Jongbloed AW (2006) Interaction between protein, phytate, and microbial phytase. In vitro studies. J Agric Food Chem 54:1753–1758. doi:10.1021/jf0518554
Kumar V, Sinha AK, Makkar HPS, Becker K (2010) Dietary roles of phytate and phytase in human nutrition: a review. Food Chem 120:945–959. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.11.052
Lee KY, Lee S, Lee HG (2010) Effect of the degree of enzymatic hydrolysis on the physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility of rice starch. Food Sci Biotechnol 19:1333–1340. doi:10.1007/s10068-010-0190-z
Lee HH, Bong CFJ, Loh SP et al (2014) Genotypic, grain morphological and locality variation in rice phytate content and phytase activity. Emirates J Food Agric 26:844–852. doi:10.9755/ejfa.v26i10.18503
Liang J, Han B, Han L et al (2007) Iron, zinc and phytic acid content of selected rice varieties from China. J Sci Food Agric 87:504–510. doi:10.1002/jsfa
Liang J, Li Z, Tsuji K et al (2008) Milling characteristics and distribution of phytic acid and zinc in long-, medium- and short-grain rice. J Cereal Sci 48:83–91. doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2007.08.003
Ma G, Jin Y, Piao J et al (2005) Phytate, calcium, iron, and zinc contents and their molar ratios in foods commonly consumed in China. J Agric Food Chem 53:10285–10290. doi:10.1021/jf052051r
Ma G, Li Y, Jin Y et al (2007) Phytate intake and molar ratios of phytate to zinc, iron and calcium in the diets of people in China. Eur J Clin Nutr 61:368–374. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602513
Maenz DD, Engele-Schaan CM, Newkirk RW, Classen HL (1999) The effect of minerals and mineral chelators on the formation of phytase-resistant and phytase-susceptible forms of phytic acid in solution and in a slurry of canola meal. Anim Feed Sci Technol 81:177–192. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00085-1
Nicholas D, Hazila KK, Chua HP, Rosniyana A (2014) Nutritional value and glycemic index of Bario rice varieties. J Trop Agric Food Sci 42:1–8
Norazalina S, Norhaizan ME, Hairuszah I, Norashareena MS (2010) Anticarcinogenic efficacy of phytic acid extracted from rice bran on azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats. Exp Toxicol Pathol 62:259–268. doi:10.1016/j.etp.2009.04.002
Norhaizan ME, Nor Faizadatul Ain A (2009) Determination of phytate, iron, zinc, calcium contents and their molar ratios in commonly consumed raw and prepared food in malaysia. Malays J Nutr 15:213–222
Norhaizan ME, Ng S, Norashareena M, Abdah MA (2011) Antioxidant and cytotoxicity effect of rice bran phytic acid as an anticancer agent on ovarian, breast and liver cancer. Malays J Nutr 17:367–375
Parada J, Aguilera JM (2007) Food microstructure affects the bioavailability of several nutrients. J Food Sci 72:R21–R32. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00274.x
Rattanachitthawat S (2010) Phenolic content and antioxidant activities in red unpolished Thai rice prevents oxidative stress in rats. J Med Plants Res 4:796–801
Sakac M, Canadanovic-Brunet J, Misan A et al (2010) Antioxidant activity of phytic acid in lipid model system. Food Technol Biotechnol 48:524–529
Sharma P, Gujral HS, Singh B (2012) Antioxidant activity of barley as affected by extrusion cooking. Food Chem 131:1406–1413. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.009
Subudhi PK, Sasaki T, Khush GS (2006) Rice. In: Kole C (ed) Genome Mapp. Mol. Breed. Plants, Cereal. Millets. Springer, Verlag, pp 264–270
Syahariza ZA, Sar S, Hasjim J et al (2013) The importance of amylose and amylopectin fine structures for starch digestibility in cooked rice grains. Food Chem 136:742–749. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.08.053
Thompson LU (1993) Potential health benefits and problems associated with antinutrients in foods. Food Res Int 26:131–149. doi:10.1016/0963-9969(93)90069-U
Vermerris W, Nicholson R (2008) Phenolic compound biochemistry. Springer Science+Business Media B.V
Yoon JH, Thompson LU, Jenkins DJ (1983) The effect of phytic acid on in vitro rate of starch digestibility and blood glucose response. Am J Clin Nutr 38:835–842
Zhang MW, Zhang RF, Zhang FX, Liu RH (2010) Phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of black rice bran of different commercially available varieties. J Agric Food Chem 58:7580–7587. doi:10.1021/jf1007665
Zhao H, Fan W, Dong J et al (2008) Evaluation of antioxidant activities and total phenolic contents of typical malting barley varieties. Food Chem 107:296–304. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.018
Zhu K-X, Lian C-X, Guo X-N et al (2011a) Antioxidant activities and total phenolic contents of various extracts from defatted wheat germ. Food Chem 126:1122–1126. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.144
Zhu L-J, Liu Q-Q, Wilson JD et al (2011b) Digestibility and physicochemical properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) flours and starches differing in amylose content. Carbohydr Polym 86:1751–1759. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.017
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the research funding provided by the Ministry of Education, Malaysia (FRGS 01-01-13-1246FR), financial support from the National Paddy and Rice Board, Malaysia (64279) and generous assistance from the Sarawak Department of Agriculture. Lee HH also wishes to thank the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Malaysia on the National Science Fellowship provided. We thank Dr. Rajan Amartalingam and ScienceDocs. Inc for the English revision and editorial services.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Research highlights
1. High level of InsP6 in dehusked rice impaired Ca, Fe and Zn bioaccessibility.
2. InsP6 showed the strongest relationship with calcium bioaccessibility.
3. InsP6 content contributed to antioxidant properties of non-pigmented rice.
4. Phenolic compounds in dehusked rice exhibit wider antioxidant properties than InsP6.
5. Breakdown of InsP6 is needed for efficient mineral absorption from Bario rice.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, H.H., Loh, S.P., Bong, C.F.J. et al. Impact of phytic acid on nutrient bioaccessibility and antioxidant properties of dehusked rice. J Food Sci Technol 52, 7806–7816 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1918-9
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1918-9

