Advertisement

Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 51, Issue 9, pp 2014–2021 | Cite as

Effect of spray drying on the sensory and physical properties of hydrolysed casein using gum arabic as the carrier

  • S. F. Subtil
  • G. A. Rocha-Selmi
  • M. Thomazini
  • M. A. Trindade
  • F. M. Netto
  • C. S. Favaro-TrindadeEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This study was aimed at spray drying hydrolysed casein using gum Arabic as the carrier agent, in order to decrease the bitter taste. Three formulations with differing proportions of hydrolysed casein: gum Arabic (10:90, 20:80 and 30:70) were prepared and characterized. They were evaluated for their moisture content, water activity, hygroscopicity, dispersibility in water and in oil, particle size and distribution, particle morphology, thermal behaviour (DSC) and bitter taste by a trained sensory panel using a paired-comparison test (free samples vs. spray dried samples). The proportion of hydrolysed casein did not affect the morphology of the microspheres. The spray drying process increased product stability and modified the dissolution time, but had no effect on the ability of the material to dissolve in either water or oil. The sensory tests showed that the spray drying process using gum Arabic as the carrier was efficient in attenuating or masking the bitter taste of the hydrolysed casein.

Keywords

Microencapsulation Encapsulation Bitter taste Thermal behaviour Sensory analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for their financial support (Process 05/56674-3) and for the scholarships conceded (Processes 05/55374-6 and 06/56714-8).

References

  1. Barbosa CMS, Morais HA, Delvivo FM, Mansur HS, Oliveira MCO, Silvestre MPC (2004) Papain hydrolysates of casein: molecular weight profile and encapsulation in lipospheres. J Sci Food Agric 84(14):1891–1900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BeMiller JN, Whistler RL (1996) Carbohydrates. In: Fennema OR (ed) Food Chemistry, vol 3. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 157–224Google Scholar
  3. Bertolini AC, Siani AC, Grosso CRF (2001) Stability of monoterpenes encapsulated in gum arabic by spray-drying. J Agric Food Chem 49:780–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruschi ML, Cardoso MLC, Lucchesi MB, Gremião MPD (2003) Gelatin microparticles containing propolis obtained by spray-drying technique: preparation and characterization. Int J Pharm 264:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai YZ, Corke H (2000) Production and properties of spray dried Amaranthus betacyanin pigments. J Food Sci 65:1248–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comunian TA, Monterrey-Quintero ES, Thomazini M, Balieiro JCC, Piccone P, Pittia P, Favaro-Trindade CS (2011) Assessment of production efficiency, physicochemical properties and storage stability of spray-dried chlorophyllide, a natural food colourant, using gum Arabic, maltodextrin and soy protein isolate-based carrier systems. Int J Food Sci Technol 46:1259–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Tinay AH, Ismail IA (1985) Effect of some additives and processes on the characteristics of agglomerated and granulated spray-dried Roselle powder. Acta Alimentaria Hung 14:283–295Google Scholar
  8. Favaro-Trindade CS, Santana AS, Monterrey-Quintero ES, Trindade MA, Netto FM (2010) The use of spray drying technology to reduce bitter taste of casein hydrolysate. Food Hydrocoll 24:336–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goula MA, Adamopoulos KG (2005) Spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: II. The effect on powder properties. J Food Eng 66:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jardim DCP, Candido LMB, Netto FM (1999) Sorption isotherms and glass transition temperatures of fish protein hydrolysates with different degrees of hydrolysis. Int J Food Prop 2(3):227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kalichevsky MT, Blanshard JM, Tokarczuck PF (1993) Effect of water content and sugars on the glass transition of casein and sodium caseinate. Int J Food Sci Technol 28:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karim AA, Bhat R (2008) Gelatin alternatives for the food industry: recent developments, challenges and prospects. Trends Food Sci Technol 19:644–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurozawa LE, Park KJ, Hubinger MD (2009) Effect of maltodextrin and gum arabic on water sorption and glass transition temperature of spray dried chicken meat hydrolysate protein. J Food Eng 91:287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lagemaat J, Silván JM, Moreno FJ, Olano A, Castillo MD (2007) In vitro glycation and antigenicity of soy proteins. Food Res Int 40:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT (1991) Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Mendanha DV, Ortiz SEM, Favaro-Trindade CS, Mauri A, Monterrey-Quintero ES, Thomazini M (2009) Microencapsulation of casein hydrolysate by complex coacervation with SPI/pectin. Food Res Int 42(8):1099–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mizumoto T, Tamura T, Kawai H, Kajiyama A, Itai S (2008) Formulations desing of taste-masked particles, including famotidine, for oral fast disintegrating dosage form. Chem Pharm Bull 56(4):530–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morais HA, De Marco LM, Oliveira MC, Silvestre MPC (2005) Casein hydrolysates using papain: peptide profile and encapsulation in liposomes. Acta Aliment 34(1):59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Newell GJ, MacFarlane JD (1987) Expanded tables for multiple comparison procedures in the analysis of ranked data. J Food Sci 52(6):1721–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oliveira AC, Moretti TS, Boschini C, Baliero JCC, Freitas AP, Freitas O, Favaro-Trindade CS (2007a) Microencapsulation of B. lactis (BI 01) and L. acidophilus (LAC 4) by complex coacervation followed by spouted-bed drying. Drying Technol 25:1687–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oliveira AC, Moretti TS, Boschini C, Baliero JCC, Freitas O, Favaro-Trindade CS (2007b) Stability of microencapsulated B. lactis (BI 01) and L. acidophilus (LAC 4) by complex coacervation followed by spray drying. J Microencapsul 24(7):685b–693bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ortiz SEM, Mauri A, Monterrey-Quintero ES, Trindade MA, Santana AS, Favaro-Trindade CS (2009) Production and properties of casein hydrolysate microencapsulated by spray drying with soybean protein isolate. LWT – Food. Sci Technol 42:919–923Google Scholar
  23. Pérez-Alonso C, Beristain CI, Lobato-Calleros C, Rodriguez-Huezo ME, Vernon-Carter EJ (2006) Thermodynamic analysis of the sorption isotherms of pure and blended carbohydrate polymers. J Food Eng 77(4):753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Righetto AM, Netto FM (2005) Effect of encapsulating materials on water sorption. glass transition and stability of encapsulated juice from immature acerola. Int J Food Prop 8:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rocha GA, Trindade MA, Netto FM, Favaro-Trindade CS (2009) Microcapsules of casein hydrolysate: production, characterization, and application in protein bar. Food Sci Technol Int 15(4):407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roos YH (1995) Phase Transitions in Foods, 1st edn. Academic, San Diego, 360pGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenberg M, Kopelman IJ, Talmon Y (1985) A scanning electron microscopy study of microencapsulation. J Food Sci 50(1):139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sagar VR, Kumar PS (2010) Recent advances in drying and dehydration of fruits and vegetables: a review. J Food Sci Technol 47(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Santos AB, Favaro-Trindade CS, Grosso CRF (2005) Preparo e caracterização de microcápsulas de oleoresina de páprica obtidas por atomização. Cienc Technol Aliment 25(2):322–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Trindade MA, Grosso CRF (2000) The stability of ascorbic acid microencapsulated in granules of rice starch and in gum Arabic. J Microencapsul 17(2):169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tonon RV, Baroni AF, Brabet C, Gibert O, Pallet D, Hubinger MD (2009) Water sorption and glass transition temperature of spray dried açai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) juice. J Food Eng 94:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. F. Subtil
    • 1
  • G. A. Rocha-Selmi
    • 2
  • M. Thomazini
    • 1
  • M. A. Trindade
    • 1
  • F. M. Netto
    • 2
  • C. S. Favaro-Trindade
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Animal Science and Food EngineeringUniversity of São Paulo (USP)PirassunungaBrazil
  2. 2.College of Food EngineeringState University of Campinas (UNICAMP)CampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations