Advertisement

Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 1047–1057 | Cite as

Textural properties of mango cultivars during ripening

  • Shyam Narayan JhaEmail author
  • Pranita Jaiswal
  • Kairam Narsaiah
  • Poonam Preet Kaur
  • Ashish Kumar Singh
  • Ramesh Kumar
Original Article

Abstract

Firmness and toughness of fruit, peel and pulp of seven different mango cultivars were studied over a ripening period of ten days to investigate the effects of harvesting stages (early, mid and late) on fruit quality. Parameters were measured at equatorial region of fruits using TA-Hdi Texture Analyzer. The textural characteristics showed a rapid decline in their behaviour until mangoes got ripened and thereafter, the decline became almost constant indicating the completion of ripening. However, the rate of decline in textural properties was found to be cultivar specific. In general, the changes in textural attributes were found to be significantly influenced by ripening period and stage of harvesting, but firmness attributes (peel, fruit and pulp) of early harvested mangoes did not differ significantly from mid harvested mangoes, while peel, fruit and pulp firmness of late harvested mangoes were found to be significantly lower than early and mid harvested mangoes.

Keywords

Harvesting stage Quality Ripening period Cultivar Textural characteristics Shelf life 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) through its subproject entitled “Development of non-destructive systems for evaluation of microbial and physico-chemical quality parameters of mango” (Code number-C1030).

References

  1. Breene WM (1975) Application of texture profile analysis to instrumental food texture evaluation. J Texture Studies 6:53–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bugaud C, Chillet M, Beaute MP, Dubois C (2006) Physicochemical analysis of mountain bananas from the French West Indies. Sci Hort 108:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen P (1996) In: Quality Evaluation Technology for Agricultural Products, Proceedings of the International Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Seoul, Korea, 12–15 November 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Goulao LF, Oliveira CM (2008) Cell wall modifications during fruit ripening: when a fruit is not the fruit – A Review. Trends Food Sci Technol 19:4–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gunness P, Kravchuk O, Nottingham ST, D’arcy BR, Gidley MJ (2009) Sensory analysis of individual strawberry fruit and comparison with instrumental analysis. Postharvest Biol Technol 52:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hosakote MY, Tyakal NP, Rudrapatnam NT (2006) Mango ripening: changes in cell wall constituents in relation to textural softening. J Sci Food Agric 86:713–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jarimopas B, Kitthawee U (2007) Firmness properties of mangoes. Int J Food Properties 10:899–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jha SN, Matsuoka T (2005) Determination of post-harvest storage life of tomato fruits. J Food Sci Technol 42(6):526–529Google Scholar
  9. Jha SN, Kingsly ARP, Chopra S (2006) Physical and mechanical properties of mango during growth and storage for determination of maturity. J Food Eng 72:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jha SN, Chopra S, Kingsly ARP (2007) Modelling of color values for nondestructive evaluation of maturity of mango. J Food Eng 78:22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jha SK, Sethi S, Srivastav M, Dubey AK, Sharma RR, Samuel DVK, Singh AK (2010a) Firmness characteristics of mango hybrids under ambient storage. J Food Eng 97:208–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jha SN, Narsaiah K, Sharma AD, Singh M, Bansal S, Kumar R (2010b) Quality parameters of mango and potential of non-destructive techniques for their measurement – a review. J Food Sci Technol 47(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson DS, Ridout MS (2000) Effects on the quality of stored apple fruit. In: Shewfelt RL, Bruckner B (eds) Fruit and vegetable quality - An integrated view. Technomic, Lancaster, pp 67–84Google Scholar
  14. Johnston JW, Hewett EW, Hertog MLATM (2002) Postharvest softening of apple (Malus domestica) fruit - A review. NZ J Crop Hort Sci 30:145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Judith AA, Tianxia Wu (2002) Firmness and force relaxation characteristics of tomatoes stored intact or as slices. Postharvest Biol Technol 24(1):59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalra SK, Tondon DK, Singh BP (1995) In: Salunkhe DK, Kadam SS (eds) Handbook of fruit science and technology: Production, Composition, Storage and Processing. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 123–170Google Scholar
  17. Konopacka D, Plocharski WJ (2004) Effect of storage conditions on relationship between apple firmness and texture acceptability. Postharvest Biol Technol 32:205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lakshminarayana S, Subhadra NV, Subramanyam H (1970) Some aspects of developmental physiology of mango fruit. J Hort Sci 45:133–142Google Scholar
  19. Medlicott AP, New SW, Thompson AK (1988) Harvest maturity effects on mago fruit ripening. Trop Agric (Trinidad) 65:153–157Google Scholar
  20. Mohsenin NN (1986) Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordan and Breach Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Nnadozie CO, Richard KV, Claire JW, Heather CMB, Alistair JH, Susan EG (2007) Influence of Md-ACS1 alletype and harvest season within an apple germplasm collection on fruit softening during cold air storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 44(3):212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pandit SS, Chidley HG, Kulkarni RS, Pujari KH, Giri AP, Gupta VS (2009) Cultivar relationships in mango based on fruit volatile profiles. Food Chem 114:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Qin W, Rongchao M, Qiao D, Yao X (2006) Studies on postharvest physiology and the storage technology of mango (Mangifera indica L.). J Food Process Preserv 30(6):670–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmilovitch Z, Mizrach A, Hoffman A, Egozi H, Fuchs Y (2000) Determination of mango physiological indices by near-infrared spectrometry. Postharvest Biol Technol 19:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sirisomboon P, Boonmung S, Pornchaloempong P, Pithuncharurnlap M (2008) A preliminary study on classification of mango maturity by compression test. Int J Food Prop 11:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sousa MB, Canet W, Alvarez MD, Fernandez C (2007) Effect of processing on the texture and sensory attributes of raspberry (cv. Heritage) and blackberry (cv. Thornfree). J Food Eng 78:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Varela P, Salvador A, Fiszman S (2008) Shelf life estimation of ‘Fuji’ apples II. The behaviour of recently harvested fruit during storage at ambient conditions. Postharvest Biology Technol 50:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shyam Narayan Jha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pranita Jaiswal
    • 1
  • Kairam Narsaiah
    • 1
  • Poonam Preet Kaur
    • 1
  • Ashish Kumar Singh
    • 1
  • Ramesh Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Agricultural Structures and Environmental Control DivisionCentral Institute of Post-harvest Engineering & TechnologyLudhianaIndia

Personalised recommendations