Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 721–728 | Cite as

Effects of modified atmosphere packaging on quality of ‘Alphonso’ Mangoes

  • Nidhi Ramayya
  • Keshavan NiranjanEmail author
  • Eric Duncan
Original Article


Postharvest quality of Alphonso mangoes (Mangifera indica L) is vital to ensure proper ripening and good quality. 500 g mature green mangoes, were subjected to three pre- packaging hot water dips (20, 30 & 40°C) for 40 min, two packaging films (OPP unperforated and perforated), using three levels of gas concentrations of 25,50 and 75% v/v CO2 treatments (balance N2) and stored at 10°C for 21 days. During the storage period headspace gas composition, weight loss, ascorbic acid, pulp firmness, external fruit colour and overall quality score were measured to determine optimum storage conditions. The most effective postharvest condition was found to be dipping in water maintained at 40°C for 40 min, followed by packaging under 50% CO2 in bags made of unperforated film when compared to mangoes packed under 25 and 75% CO2 which showed deteriorated quality including spoilage and mould. Good keeping quality of at least 21 days was achieved under these conditions, which was much superior to the control samples that showed deterioration after 12 days of storage.


Alphonso mango Modified atmosphere packaging Carbon dioxide Quality Postharvest Hot water treatment 


  1. Abreu M, Beirão-da-Costa S, Concalves E, Beirão-da-Costa ML, Moldao-Marins M (2003) Use of mild heat pre-treatments for quality retention of fresh-cut ‘Rocha’ pear. Postharvest Biol Technol 30:135–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali ZM, Armugam H, Lazan H (1995) β-Galactosidase and its significance in ripening mango fruit. Phytochem 38:1109–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali ZM, Chin LH, Lazan L (2005) A comparative study on wall degrading enzymes pectin modifications and softening during ripening of selected tropical fruits. Plant Sci 167:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaulieu JC, Lea JM (2003) Volatile and quality changes in fresh-cut mangos prepared from firm-ripe and soft-ripe fruit, stored in clamshell containers and passive MAP. Postharvest Biol Technol 30:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beirão-da-Costa S, Steiner A, Correia L, Empis J, Moldão-Martins M (2006) Effects of maturity stage and mild heat treatments on quality of minimally processed kiwifruit. J Food Eng 76:616–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bender RJ, Brecht JK, Baldwin EA, Malundo, T (1997) Effects of controlled atmosphere storage on aroma volatiles of ‘Tommy Atkins’ mangoes; In: Kader AA (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Controlled Atm. Research Conference, vol. 3, Davis, CA, 13–18 July, p 82Google Scholar
  7. Benitez MM, Acedo AL Jr., Jitareerat P, Kanlavanarat P (2006) Mango fruit softening response to postharvest heat treatment. Acta Hort 712:811–816Google Scholar
  8. Berardini N, Fezer R, Conrad J, Beifuss U, Carle R, Schieber A (2005) Screening of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars for their contents of flavonol O- and xanthone C-glycosides, anthocyanins, and pectin. J Agric Food Chem 53:1563–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantwell MI, Suslow TV (2002) Postharvest handling systems: fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. In: Kader AA (ed) Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. University of California, Davis, pp 445–463Google Scholar
  10. Chaplin GR, Scott KJ, Brown BI (1982) Effects of storing mangoes in polyethylene bags at ambient temperature. Singapore J Pr Ind 10:84–88Google Scholar
  11. Chatanawarangoon S (2000) Quality maintenance of fresh-cut mango slices, Master Thesis, Davis University of California, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Civello PM, Martinez GA, Chaves AR, Anon MC (1997) Heat treatment delay ripening and postharvest decay of strawberry fruit. J Agric Food Chem 45(12):4589–4594Google Scholar
  13. Djioua T, Charles F, Lopez-Lauri F, Filgueiras H, Coudret A, Freire M Jr, Ducamp-Collin MN, Sallanon H (2009) Improving the storage of minimally processed mangoes (Mangifera indica L.) by hot water treatments. Postharvest Biol Technol 52:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Food and Agriculture Organization (2005) FAOSTAT database collections, agricultural data, food and agriculture organization of the United NationGoogle Scholar
  15. Gholap AS, Bandyopadhyay C, Nadkarni GB (1986) Aroma development in mango fruit. J Food Biochem 10:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorny JR (1997) A summary of CA and MA requirements and recommendations for the storage of fresh-cut (minimally processed) fruits and vegetables. Proc. Seventh International Controlled Atmosphere Research Conference; Davis, CA, July 13–18, 1997 Vol. 5: Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables and MAP. Postharvest Horticulture Series No. 19, University of California at Davis, pp: 30–66Google Scholar
  17. Grundhofer P, Niemetz R, Schilling G, Gross GG (2001) Biosynthesis and sub cellular distribution of hydrolysable tannins. Phytochem 57:915–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haard NF, Chism GW (1996) Characteristics of edible plant tissues. In: Fennema OR (ed) Food Chemistry, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 943–1011Google Scholar
  19. Jacobi KK, Giles JE (1997) Quality of ‘Kensington’ mango (Mangifera indica Linn.) fruit following combined vapour heat disinfestation and hot water disease control treatments. Postharvest Biol Technol 12:285–292Google Scholar
  20. Jacobi KK, MacRae EA, Hetherington SE (2001) Postharvest heat disinfestation treatments of mango fruit. Scientia Hort 89:171–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson GI, Sharp JL, Mine DL, Oostluyse SA (1997) Postharvest technology and quarantine treatments. In: Litz RE (Ed), The Mango: Botany, Production and Uses, Tropical Research and Education Center, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Kader AA (1994) Modified and controlled atmosphere storage of tropical fruits. In: Champ BR, Highley E, Johnson GI (Eds.), ACIAR Proceedings, vol. 50: Postharvest Handling of Tropical Fruits, Thailand, p 239–249Google Scholar
  23. Kader AA (2003) Physiology of CA treated produce. Acta Hort 600:349–354Google Scholar
  24. Kader AA, Zagory D, Kerbel EL (1989) Modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables. Crit Rev Food Sci Nut 28:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kampfenkel K, Van Montagu M, Inze D (1995) Extraction and determination of ascorbate and dehydroascorbate from plant tissue. Anal Biochem 225:165–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim DM, Smith NL, Lee CY (1993) Apple cultivar variations in response to heat treatment and minimal processing. J Food Sci 58:1111–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim Y, Brecht JK, Talcott ST (2007) Antioxidant phytochemical and fruit quality changes in mango (Mangifera indica L.) following hot water immersion and controlled atmosphere storage. Food Chem 105:1327–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein JD, Lurie S (1990) Prestorage heat treatment as a means of improving post storage quality of apples. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 115:265–269Google Scholar
  29. Koukounaras A, Diamantidis G, Sfakiotakis E (2007) The effect of heat treatment on quality retention of fresh-cut peach. Postharvest Biol Technol 48:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lakshminarayana S, Subramanyam H (1970) Carbon dioxide injury and fermentative decarboxylation in mango fruit at low temperature. J Food Sci Technol 7:148–152Google Scholar
  31. Lazan H, Ali Z, Lee K, Voon J, Chaplin G (1986) The potential role of polygalacturonase in pectin degradation and softening of mango fruit. ASEAN Food J 2:93–95Google Scholar
  32. Lurie S (1998) Postharvest heat treatments. Postharvest Biol Technol 14:257–269Google Scholar
  33. Maga JA (1995) Influence of dips, modified atmospheric packaging, and storage time on the enzymatic discoloration of processed raw potatoes. Food Flavours, Ingredients and Composition 37A: 491–495Google Scholar
  34. McCollum TG, Daquino S, McDonald RE (1993) Heat treatment inhibits mango chilling injury. HortScience 28:197–198Google Scholar
  35. Mc Guire RG (1992) Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 27:1254–1255Google Scholar
  36. Miller WR, Hale PW, Spaldling DH, Davis P (1983) Quality and decay of mango fruit wrapped in heat-shrinkable film. HortScience 18:957–958Google Scholar
  37. Mitcham EJ, McDonald RE (1993) Respiration rate, internal atmosphere, and ethanol and acetaldehyde accumulation in heat-treated mango fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 3:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitra SK, Baldwin EA (1997) Mango. In: Mitra SK (ed) Postharvest physiology and storage of tropical and subtropical fruits. CAB, New York, pp 85–122Google Scholar
  39. Nanos GD, Kader AA (1993) Low O2 induced changes in pH and energy change in pear fruit tissue. Post Harvest Biol Technol 3:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ortega-Zaleta D, Yahia EM (2000) Tolerance and quality of mango fruit exposed to controlled atmospheres at high temperatures. Postharvest Biol Technol 20:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pesis E, Aharoni D, Aharon Z, Ben-Arie R, Aharoni N, Fuchs Y (2000) Modified atmosphere and modified humidity packaging alleviates chilling injury symptoms in mango fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 19:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Porat R, Pavoncello D, Peretz, J Ben-Yehoshua S, Lurie S (2000) Effects of various heat treatments on the induction of cold tolerance and on the postharvest qualities of “Star Ruby” grapefruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 18:159–165Google Scholar
  43. Roberts JKM, Chang K, Webster C, Callis J, Walbot V (1989) Dependence of ethanolic fermentation, cytoplasmic pH regulation and viability on the activity of alchohol dehydrogenase in hypoxic maize roots. Plant Physiol 89:1275–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rodov V, Fishman S, De la Asuncion R, Peretz J, Ben Yehoshua S (1997) Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) of ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango in perforated films. Acta Hort 455:654–661Google Scholar
  45. Sauco VG (2004) Mango production and world market: current situation and future prospects. Acta Hort 45:107–116Google Scholar
  46. Schieber A, Ullrich W, Carle R (2000) Characterization of polyphenols in mango puree concentrate by HPLC with diode array and mass spectrometric detection. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 1:161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shalom NR, Hanzon J, Pinto R, Lurie S (1996) Cell wall changes and partial prevention of fruit softening in prestorage heat treated ‘Anna’ apples. J Sci Food Agric 72:231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shellie C, Mangan RL, Ingle SJ (1997) Tolerance of grapefruit and Mexican fruit fly larvae to heated controlled atmospheres. Postharvest Bio Technol 10:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tefera A, Seyoum T, Woldetsadik K (2007) Effect of disinfection packaging, and storage environment on the shelf life of mango. Biosystems Eng 96:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vinci G, Botre F, Mele G, Ruggieri G (1995) Ascorbic acid in exotic fruits: a liquid chromatographic investigation. Food Chem 53:211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Youngmok Kim, Jeffrey K Brecht, Stephen T Talcott (2007) Antioxidant phytochemical and fruit quality changes in mango (Mangifera indica L.) following hot water immersion and controlled atmosphere storage. Food Chemistry 105:1327–1334Google Scholar
  52. Yuen CMC, Tan SC, Joyce D, Chettri P (1997) Effect of postharvest calcium and polymeric films on ripening and peel injury in ‘Kensington Pride’ mango. ASEAN Food J 8:110–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food and Nutritional SciencesUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  2. 2.Paragon FlexibleGainsboroughUK

Personalised recommendations