Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative wood anatomy with ecological and evolutionary trends among different growth forms of genus Ficus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ficus is a largest genus of family Moraceae with amazing diversity in growth forms varying from shrub and lianas/climbers to free-growing and epiphytic trees. While it is easy to find habits variations among various families, within families, or even between genera, it is more interesting to find them within a genus. The objective of the study was to investigate the wood anatomical variations among the different habits of Ficus. Wood samples were collected from the ten Ficus species which includes shrub (F. squamosa), climbers/lianas (F. pumila and F. hederacea), small trees (F. carica, F. arnottiana, F. sarmentosa) and very large trees (F. virens, F. drupacea, F. pomifera, F. krishnae). All species of selected growth forms shared common wood anatomical features like diffuse porosity, solitary with radial multiple of 2–5 vessels, SVOs angular, simple perforation plate and heterocellular rays. However, significant variations were observed in fiber septation; ripple marks, tyloses, ray characteristics, type of parenchyma, prismatic crystals and shape of IVPs. Among all habits, vessel frequency decrease from climber (~ 50/ mm) to shrubs followed by small tree with lowest in large trees ( ~ 10 vessels/ mm). Climber species have less fiber with more vessels per millimeter and presence of ripple marks. In evolutionary trends, shrub are more primitive than tree, climber/lianas and ecologically the lower value of mesomorphy and vulnerability index in shrub indicate devoid to xeric conditions and tree habit with highest values shown in large tree F. virens i.e., 61.14 and 21,703 respectively. The present study reveals that even wood anatomy is conservative science with consistent or constant qualitative wood anatomical features but the habits alter the anatomy itself within same genus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baas P, Schweingruber FH (1987) Ecological trends in the wood anatomy of trees, shrubs and vines. IAWA Bull N.s. 8:245–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey IW (1957) The potentialities and limitations of wood anatomy in the study of the phylogeny and classification of angiosperms. J Arnold Arboretum 38(3):243–254. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43794464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y (2007) Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot 99:375–407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berg CC (1989) Classification and distribution of Ficus. Experientia 45:605–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg CC, Corner EJH (2005) Moraceae-Ficus. Flora Malesiana Ser I (seed Plants) 17(2):1–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsen KJ, ter Welle BJH (1984) Systematic wood anatomy and affinities of the Urticaceae. Botanische Jahrbucher Fur Systematik 105:49–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist S (1975) Ecological strategies in xylem evolution. University of California Press, Berkley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist S (1977) Ecological factors in wood evolution: a floristic approach. Am J Bot 64(7):887–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist S (1985) Observation on functional wood histology of vines and lianas: vessels dimorphism, tracheids, vasicentric tracheids, narrow vessels, and parenchyma. Aliso 11:139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist S, Hoekman DA (1985) Ecological wood anatomy of the woody southern Californian flora. IAWA Bull 6:319–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist S (2001) Comparative wood anatomy. Systematic, ecological, and evolutionary aspects of dicotyledon wood. Springer, Berlin.

  • Corner EJH (1965) Check list of Ficus in Asia and Australasia with keys to identification. Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 21:1–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist A (1968) The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1865) On the movements and habits of climbing plants. Bot J Linn Soc 9:1–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers FW (1985) Xylem structure and water conduction in conifer trees, dicot trees, and lianas. IAWA Bull N.s. 6:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers FW, Fisher JB, Chiu ST (1990) A survey of vessel dimensions in stems of tropical lianas and other growth forms. Oecologia 84:544–552

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers FW, Fisheb JB, Fichtner K (1991) Water flux and xylem structure in vines. In: Putz FZ, Mooney H (eds) Biology of vines. Cambridge University Press, pp 119–152

  • Gartner BL, Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Brown VB, Whitbeck JL (1990) Water transport properties of vine and tree stems in a tropical deciduous forest. Amer J Bot 77:742–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAWA Committee (1989) IAWA list of microscopic feature of hardwood identification, IAWA Bull. (N.S.) 10: 219–332.

  • Isnard S, Silk WK (2009) Moving climbing plants from Charles Darwin’s time into the 21st century. Amer J Bot 96:1205–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koek-Noorman J, ter Topper SMC, Welle BJH (1984) The systematic wood anatomy of the Moraceae (Urticales) III. Tribe Ficeae IAWA Bulletin 5:330–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Cabrera HI, Jones CS, Espino S, Schenk HJ (2009) Wood anatomy and wood density in shrubs: responses to varying aridity along transcontinental transects. Am J Bot 96:1388–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Cabrera HI, Schenk HJ, Cevallos-Ferriz SRS, Jones CS (2011) Integration of vessel traits, wood density, and height in angiosperm shrubs and trees. Ame J Bot 98(5):915–922. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27975354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe CR and Chalk L (1950) Anatomy of the dicotyledons: Leaves, Stem, and Wood, in Relation to taxonomy with Notes on Economic Uses. 2nd Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford. http://www.worldcat.org/title/anatomy-of-the-dicotyledons-leaves-stem-and-wood-in-relation-to-taxonomy-with-notes-on-economic-uses/oclc/517842

  • Morris H, Plavcová L, Cvecko P et al (2016) A global analysis of parenchyma tissue fractions in secondary xylem of seed plants. New Phytol 209:1553–1565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RS, Brown HP (1932) Commercial Timbers of India: their Distribution, Supplies, Anatomical Structure, Physical and Mechanical Properties and Uses. Vol. 1. Pp. xlv + 548 + 182 plates. Vol. 2. Pp. ix + 549–1150 + plates 183–320. (Calcutta: Government of India Central Publication Branch; London: High Commissioner for India, 1932).

  • Putz FE (1990) Liana stem diameter growth and mortality rates on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 22:103–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raturi RD, Chauhan L, Gupta S (2001) Indian woods: their identification, properties and uses. volume-vi. Saharanpur electric press, ICFRE.

  • Rowe N, Speck T (2005) Plant growth forms: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. New Phytol 166:61–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rury PM (1985) Systematic and ecological wood anatomy of the Erythroxylaceae. IAWA Bull N.s. 2:3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M, Sharma C, Lalmalsawma M, Singh M, Gogoi B (2014) Wood anatomy of some Ficus species of Mizoram, ne India with reference to their identification. Int J Bot Res (IJBR) 4:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussex IM, Kerk NM (2001) The evolution of plant architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:33–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tippo O (1938) Comparative anatomy of the Moraceae and their presumed allies. Bot Gaz 100:1–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis K, McElwain JC (2013) The evolution of plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav R, Kumar D, Ansari T (2022) Wood fiber characteristics of underutilized poplar species and comparision with P. deltoides in terms of their pulp and paper quality. J ISSN 3(11):1433–1439. https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1617. https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres1617.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronak Yadav.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, R., Gupta, S., Verma, P.K. et al. Comparative wood anatomy with ecological and evolutionary trends among different growth forms of genus Ficus. J Indian Acad Wood Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13196-024-00336-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13196-024-00336-3

Keywords

Navigation