Abramowitz, G. (2017). Calibrating ensembles for model independence. Talk available online, last checked the 18. Sept. 2020. https://www.agci.org/lib/17s2/calibrating-ensembles-model-independencehttps://www.agci.org/lib/17s2/calibrating-ensembles-model-independence.
Abramowitz, G., Herger, N., Gutmann, E., Hammerling, D., Knutti, R., Leduc, M., Lorenz, R., Pincus, R., & Schmidt, G.A. (2018). Model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: Weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing. Earth System Dynamics Discussions, 1–20.
Baumberger, C., Knutti, R., & Hadorn, G.H. (2017). Building confidence in climate model projections: An analysis of inferences from fit. WIREs Climate Change, 8, e454.
Betz, G. (2015). Are climate models credible worlds? prospects and limitations of possibilistic climate prediction. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(2), 5.
Brunner, L., Pendergrass, A.G., Lehner, F., Merrifield, A.L., Lorenz, R., & Knutti, R. (2020). Reduced global warming from cmip6 projections when weighting models by performance and independence. Earth System Dynamics, 11 (4), 995–1012.
Carrier, M., & Lenhard, J. (2019), Climate models: How to assess their reliability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
Charney, J.G., et al. (1979). Carbon dioxide and climate: A scientific assessment : Report of an ad hoc study group on carbon dioxide and climate, woods hole, massachusetts, july 23-27, 1979 to the climate research board, assembly of mathematical and physical sciences, national research council. National Academy of Sciences: Available from Climate Research Board, http://books.google.com/books?id=cj0rAAAAYAAJ.
Clarke, L. (2008). Possibilistic thinking: A new conceptual tool for thinking about extreme events. Social Research, 75, 669–690.
Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., & et al. (2013). Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility. In In Stocker et al. (2013), chapter 12.
Dahan, A. (2010). Putting the earth system in a numerical box ? the evolution from climate modeling toward climate change. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 282–292.
Fosser, G., Kendon, E.J., Stephenson, D., & Tucker, S. (2020). Convection-permitting models offer promise of more certain extreme rainfall projections, (Vol. 47.
Hausfather, Z. (2019). Cmip6: The next generation of climate models explained. Carbon Brief, https://www.carbonbrief.org/cmip6-the-next-generation-of-climate-models-explained, last checked the 05/04/2020.
Herger, N., Abramowitz, G., Knutti, R., Angélil, O., Lehmann, K., & Sanderson, B.M. (2018). Selecting a climate model subset to optimise key ensemble properties. Earth System Dynamic, 9, 135–151.
IPCCFAQ 1.1 (2013). If understanding of the climate system has increased, why hasn’t the range of temperature projections been reduced?. In Stocker et al. (2013), chapter 1 (pp. 140–141).
IPCCFAQ 12.1 (2013). Why are so many models and scenarios used to project climate change?. In Stocker et al. (2013), chapter 12(pp. 1036–1037).
IPCCFAQ 9.1 (2013). Are climate models getting better, and how would we know?. In Stocker et al. (2013), chapter 9 (pp. 824–825).
Katzav, J. (2014). The epistemology of climate models and some of its implications for climate science and the philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46, 228–238.
Katzav, J., & Parker, W.S. (2015). The future of climate modeling. Climatic Change, 132, 475–487.
Klein, S.A., & Hall, A. (2015). Emergent constraints for cloud feedbacks. Current Climate Change Reports, 4(1), 276–287.
Knutti, R. (2010). The end of model democracy? Climatic Change, 102, 395–404.
Knutti, R., & Sedláček, J. (2012). Robustness and uncertainties in the new cmip5 climate model projections. Nature Climate Change, 3, 369–373.
Le Treut, H. (2009). Nouveau climat sur la Terre : Comprendre, prédire, réagir. Flammarion.
Leduc, M., Laprise, R., Elía, R., & Šeparović, L. (2016). Is institutional democracy a good proxy for model independence?. American Meteorological Society, 29.
Lloyd, E.A. (2009). I–varieties of support and confirmation of climate models. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 83, 213–232.
Lloyd, E.A. (2010). Confirmation and robustness of climate models. Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 971–984.
Lloyd, E.A. (2015). Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 49, 58–68.
Murphy, J.M., Sexton, D.M., Barnett, H., & et al. (2004). Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature, 430, 768–772.
Parker, W.S. (2011). When climate models agree: The significance of robust model predictions. Philosophy of Science, 78(4), 579–600.
Parker, W.S (2013). Ensemble modeling, uncertainty and robust predictions. Climate Change, 4, 213–223.
Parker, W.S. (2018). Climate science, the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2018 edition). Zalta, E.N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/climate-science/.
Parker, W.S., & Lusk, G. (2019). Incorporating user values into climate services. American Meteorological Society, (September, 2019, 1643–1650.
Pichelli, E., Coppola, E., Sobolowski, S., Ban, N., Giorgi, F., Stocchi, P., Alias, A., Belušić, D., Berthou, S., Caillaud, C., Cardoso, R.M., Chan, S., Christensen, O.B., Dobler, A., de Vries, H., Goergen, K., Kendon, E.J., Keuler, K., Lenderink, G., ..., Vergara-Temprado, J. (2021). The first multi-model ensemble of regional climate simulations at kilometer-scale resolution part 2: Historical and future simulations of precipitation. Climate Dynamics.
Räisänen, J. (2007). How reliable are climate models? Tellus A, 59, 2–29.
Reichler, T., & Kim, J. (2008). How well do coupled models simulate today’s climate? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 89, 303–312.
Ribes, A., Qasmi, S., & Gillett, N.P. (2021). Making climate projections conditional on historical observations. Science Advances, 7(4).
Sanderson, B.M., Knutti, R., & Caldwell, P. (2015a). Addressing interdependence in a multimodel ensemble by interpolation of model properties. Journal of Climate, 28, 5150–5170.
Sanderson, B.M., Knutti, R., & Caldwell, P. (2015b). A representative democracy to reduce interdependence in a multimodel ensemble. Journal of Climate, 28(13), 5171–5194.
Schmidt, G.A. (2018). Model independence day. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2018/07/model-independence-day/, last checked March 5, 2021.
Schupbach, J.N. (2018). Robustness analysis as explanatory reasoning. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(1), 275–300.
In T. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. Allen, & et al. (Eds.) (2013). IPCC climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, E., Frigg, R., & Helgeson, C. (2016). Expert judgment for climate change adaptation. Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 1110–1121.
Vezér, M. A. (2016). Computer models and the evidence of anthropogenic climate change: An epistemology of variety-of-evidence inferences and robustness analysis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 56, 95–102.
Vezér, M. A. (2017). Variety-of-evidence reasoning about the distant past: A case study in paleoclimate reconstruction. European Journal in Philosophy of Science, 7, 257–265.
Webb, M.J., Andrews, T., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Bony, S., Bretherton, C.S., Chadwick, R., Chepfer, H., Douville, H., Good, P., Kay, J.E., Klein, S.A., Marchand, R., Medeiros, B., Siebesma, A.P., Skinner, C.B., Stevens, B., Tselioudis, G., Tsushima, Y., & Watanabe, M. (2017). The cloud feedback model intercomparison project (cfmip) contribution to cmip6. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(1), 359–384.
Winsberg, E. (2018). What does robustness teach us in climate science: A re-appraisal. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01997-7.