Armstrong, D. M. (1983). What is a law of nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1993). The identification problem and the inference problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 421–422.
Barker, S. (2009). Dispositional monism, relational constitution and quiddities. Analysis, 69(2), 242–250.
Barker, S., & Smart, B. (2012). The ultimate argument against dispositional monist accounts of Laws. Analysis, 72(4), 714–722.
Bigelow, J., Ellis, B., & Lierse, C. (1992). The world as one of a kind: Natural necessity and Laws of nature. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 43, 371–388.
Bird, A. (2007). Nature’s metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carroll, J. W. (2008). Nailed to Hume’s cross? In J. Hawthorne, T. Sider & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Contemporary debates in metaphysics (pp. 67–81). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Carroll, J. W. (1994). Laws of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cartwright, N., & Pemberton, J. (2013). Aristotelian powers: Without them, what would modern science do? In R. Groff & J. Greco (Eds.), Powers and capacities in philosophy: The new Aristotelianism (pp. 93–112). New York: Routledge.
Cartwright, N., & Ward, K. (Eds.). (2016). Rethinking order: After the Laws of nature. London: Bloomsbury.
Cei, A., & French, S. (2010). Getting away from governance: A Structuralistic approach to Laws and Symmetries. Methode: Analytic Perspectives, 4, 25–48.
Chakravartty, A. (2019). Physics, metaphysics, dispositions, and symmetries – À la French. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 74, 10–15.
Demarest, H. (2017). Powerful properties, powerless Laws. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Causal powers (pp. 38–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Descartes, R. (1982) . Principles of philosophy. Miller, V.R. and Miller, R.P. (trans) Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company..
Dretske, F. (1977). Laws of nature. Philosophy of Science, 44, 248–268.
Dumsday, T. (2019). Dispositionalism and the metaphysics of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, B. (1999). Causal powers and Laws of Nature & Response to David Armstrong. In Sankey, H. (ed.) Causation and Laws of Nature. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 19-34, 39–44.
Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, B. (2005). Universals, the essential problem and categorical properties. Ratio, 18, 462–472.
Fraassen, B. V. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
French, S. (2014). The structure of the world: Metaphysics and representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Handfield, T. (2004). Counterlegals and necessary Laws. The Philosophical Quarterly, 54, 402–419.
Hildebrand, T. (2013). Tooley’s account of the necessary connection between law and regularity. Philosophical Studies, 166, 33–43.
Kistler, M. (2020). Powers, dispositions, and laws of nature. In A. S. Meincke (Ed.), Dispositionalism: perspectives from metaphysics and the philosophy of science (pp. 171–188). Cham: Springer.
Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every thing must go. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lange, M. (2009). Laws and Lawmakers: Science, metaphysics, and the Laws of nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Livanios, V. (2010). Symmetries, dispositions and essences. Philosophical Studies, 148, 295–305.
Livanios, V. (2014). The “constant” threat to the dispositional essentialist conception of Laws. Metaphysica, 15, 129–155.
Livanios, V. (2017). Science in metaphysics: Exploring the metaphysics of properties and Laws. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Livanios, V. (2018). Dispositionality and symmetry structures. Metaphysica, 19, 201–217.
Marmodoro, A. (Ed.). (2010). The metaphysics of powers: Their grounding and their manifestations. London: Routledge.
Maudlin, T. (2007). The metaphysics within physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Molnar, G. (2003). Powers: A study in metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mumford, S. (2004). Laws in nature. London: Routledge.
Mumford, S., & Anjum, R. L. (2011). Getting causes from powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mumford, S., & Anjum, R. L. (2018). What tends to be: The philosophy of dispositional modality. New York: Routledge.
Noether, E. (1918). Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachr. d. Konig. Gesellschd. d.Wiss. Zu Gottingen, Math-phys. Klasse, 235–57.
Pages, J. (2002). The Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong theory of natural Laws and the inference problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 16, 227–243.
Psillos, S. (2016). Broken structuralism. Metascience, 25(2), 163–171.
Psillos, S. (2018). Laws and Powers in the frame of nature. In L. Patton & W. Ott (Eds.), Laws of nature (pp. 80–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schaffer, J. (2016). It is the business of Laws to govern. Dialectica, 70(4), 577–588.
Sider, T. (1992). Tooley’s solution to the inference problem. Philosophical Studies, 67, 261–275.
Tooley, M. (1977). The nature of law. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7, 667–698.
Tooley, M. (1987). Causation: A realist approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tugby, M. (2016). Universals, Laws, and governance. Philosophical Studies, 173(5), 1147–1163.
Vetter, B. (2009). Review of Nature’s metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 12, 320–328.
Vetter, B. (2012). Dispositional essentialism and the Laws of nature. In A. Bird, B. Ellis, & H. Sankey (Eds.), Properties, powers and structures: Issues in the metaphysics of realism (pp. 201–215). New York: Routledge.
Vetter, B. (2015). Potentiality: From dispositions to modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weiland, J. W., & Betti, A. (2008). Relata-specific relations: A response to Vallicella. Dialectica, 62(4), 509–524.