Synthetic biology and the search for alternative genetic systems: Taking how-possibly models seriously
- 633 Downloads
Many scientific models in biology are how-possibly models. These models depict things as they could be, but do not necessarily capture actual states of affairs in the biological world. In contemporary philosophy of science, it is customary to treat how-possibly models as second-rate theoretical tools. Although possibly important in the early stages of theorizing, they do not constitute the main aim of modelling, namely, to discover the actual mechanism responsible for the phenomenon under study. In the paper it is argued that this prevailing picture does not do justice to the synthetic strategy that is commonly used in biological engineering. In synthetic biology, how-possibly models are not simply speculations or eliminable scaffolds towards a single how-actually model, but indispensable design hypotheses for a field whose ultimate goal is to build novel biological systems. The paper explicates this by providing an example from the study of alternative genetic systems by synthetic biologist Steven Benner and his group. The case will also highlight how the method of synthesis, even when it fails, provides an effective way to limit the space of possible models for biological systems.
KeywordsHow-possibly models Synthetic biology Alternative genetic systems Possibility Actuality
I would like to thank Tero Ijäs, Tarja Knuuttila, Kristin Kokkov, and Jani Raerinne for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Academy of Finland project number 272604: Biological Knowledge through Modeling and Engineering.
- Beatty, J. (1995). The evolutionary contingency thesis. In G. Wolters, J.G. Lennox, & P. McLaughlin (Eds.), Concepts, theories, and rationality in the biological sciences. The second Pittsburgh-Konstanz colloquium in the philosophy of science (pp. 45–81). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Benner, S. A., Karalkar, N. B., Hoshika, S., Laos, R., Shaw, R. W., Matsuura, M., et al. (2016). Alternative Watson–Crick synthetic genetic systems. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a023770.
- Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Dray, W. (1957). Laws and explanation in history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Glennan, S. (2010). Mechanisms, causes, and the layered model of the world. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXXXI, 362–381.Google Scholar
- Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sterelny, K, and P.E. Griffiths. (1999). Sex and death: An introduction to philosophy of biology. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Szathmáry, E. (2003). Why are there four letters in the genetic alphabet? Nature Reviews Genetics, 4, 995–1001.Google Scholar
- Wagner, A. (2005). Robustness and evolvability in living systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar