Allchin, D. (2001). Error types. Perspectives on Science, 9, 38–59.
Blachowicz, J. (2009). How science textbooks treat scientific method: a philosopher’s perspective. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(2), 303–344.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Bird, A. (1998). Philosophy of science. London: Routledge.
Bortolotti, L. (2008). An introduction to the philosophy of science. Cambridge: Polity.
Cable, M. (2005). Calibration: A technician’s guide. ISA.
Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? (3rd ed.). Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
COPE. (2011). Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors. http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf. Accessed June 12th, 2013.
Curd, M., & Cover, J. A. (2012). Philosophy of science: The central issues (2nd ed.). New York: WW Norton.
Doran, P. (2006). Cold, hard facts. The New York Times. July 27, 2006.
Ennis, R. (1979). Research in philosophy of science bearing on science education. In P. Asquith & H. Kyburg (Eds.), Current research in philosophy of science (pp. 138–170). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
European Commission. (2008). The European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (EQF). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/education/pub/pdf/general/eqf/broch_en.pdf. Accessed May 15th, 2013.
Grayson, D. J. (2006). Rethinking the content of physics courses. Physics Today, 59(2), 31.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hansson, S. O. (2012). Risk. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition). <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/risk/>. Accessed June 15th, 2013.
Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: a methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 383–403.
Hillerbrand, R., & Ghil, M. (2008). Anthropogenic climate change: scientific uncertainties and moral dilemmas. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 237(14), 2132–2138.
Hodson, D. (1991). Philosophy of science and science education. In M. Matthews (Ed.), History, philosophy, and science teaching (pp. 19–32). Toronto, ON: OISE Press.
Hoover, K. D., & Perez, S. J. (2000). Three attitudes towards data mining. Journal of Economic Methodology, 7(2), 195–210.
IPCC. (2007). Summary for policymakers. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, & H. L. Miller (Eds.), Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Limited.
Kitcher, P. (2003). Science, truth and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge.
Lehtinen, A., & Kuorikoski, J. (2007). Computing the perfect model: why do economists shun simulation? Philosophy of Science, 74, 304–329.
Macrina, F. L. (2005). Scientific integrity. Washington, DC: ASM Press.
Martin, M. (1976). The relevance of philosophy of science for science education. In R. Cohen, C. A. Hooker, A. C. Michalos, & J. van Evra (Eds.), PSA 1974 (pp. 293–300). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Matthews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Medawar, P. B. (1963). Is the scientific paper a fraud. The Listener, 70(12), 377–378.
Medawar, P. B. (1969). Induction and intuition in scientific thought. London: Routledge.
Okasha, S. (2002). Philosophy of science: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ontario Council of Academic Vice Presidents (OCAV). (2008). Guidelines for university undergraduate degree level expectations. http://www.uwo.ca/univsec/handbook/general/OCAV_Guidelines_2005.pdf. Last accessed May 16th, 2013.
Prather, C. M., Choate, D. M., Michel, M. J., & Crowl, T. A. (2009). Putting the “Ph” back into “PhD”: framing graduate research in a theoretical context. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(7), 389–390.
Rosenberg, A. (2005). Philosophy of science a contemporary introduction (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Salmon, M. H., Earman, J., Glymour, C., Lennox, J., Schaffner, K. F., Salmon, W. C., et al. (1999). Introduction to the philosophy of science: A text by members of the department of the history and philosophy of science of the University of Pittsburgh. Indianapolis, IN: Hacket Publishing Company.
Schickore, J. (2008). Doing science, writing science. Philosophy of Science, 75(3), 323–343.
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2009). Responsible conduct of research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siegel, H. (1989). The rationality of science, critical thinking, and science education. Synthese, 80(1), 9–41.
Stigler, S. (2008). Fisher and the 5 % level. Chance, 21(4), 12.
Turner, S. (2001). What is the problem with experts? Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 123–149.
Varian, H. R. (1997). How to build an economic model in your spare time. The American Economist, 41, 3–10.