Filling in the mechanistic details: two-variable experiments as tests for constitutive relevance
- 125 Downloads
This paper provides an account of the experimental conditions required for establishing whether correlating or causally relevant factors are constitutive components of a mechanism connecting input (start) and output (finish) conditions. I argue that two-variable experiments, where both the initial conditions and a component postulated by the mechanism are simultaneously manipulated on an independent basis, are usually required in order to differentiate between correlating or causally relevant factors and constitutively relevant ones. Based on a typical research project molecular biology, a flowchart model detailing typical stages in the formulation and testing of hypotheses about mechanistic components is also developed.
KeywordsMolecular biology Experimentation Mechanistic explanation Causal relevance
I would like to thank Lindley Darden, as well as the editor and two anonymous reviewers for very useful comments on earlier drafts.
- Baetu, T. M. (2012a). Chance, Reproducibility and Irregular Mechanisms.Google Scholar
- Baetu, T. M. (2012b), Holistic Confirmation and Extrapolative Hypotheses in Molecular Biology.Google Scholar
- Baetu, T. M., Kwon, H., Sharma, S., Grandveaux, N., & Hiscott, J. (2001). Disruption of NF-kB signalling reveals a novel role for NF-kB in the regulation of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand expression. Journal of Immunology, 167, 3164–3173.Google Scholar
- Bechtel, W. (2006). Discovering cell mechanisms: The creation of modern cell biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Darden, L. (1991). Theory change in science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kwon, H., Pelletier, N., DeLuca, C., Genin, P., Cisternas, S., Lin, R., Wainberg, M. A., & Hiscott, J. (1998). Inducible expression of IκBα repressor mutants interferes with NF-κB Activity and HIV-1 replication in Jurkat T cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273, 7431–7440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leuridan, B. (2011). Three Problems for the mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance in mechanisms. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, doi: 10.1093/bjps/axr036.
- McKay, P., & Williamson, J. (2011). What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. European Journal for Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
- Miura, Y., Misawa, N., Maeda, N., Inagaki, Y., Tanaka, Y., Ito, M., Kayagaki, N., Yamamoto, N., Yagita, H., & Mizusawa, H. (2001). Critical contribution of Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis- inducing Ligand (TRAIL) to apoptosis of human CD4(+) T cells in HIV-1- infected hu-PBL-NOD-SCID mice. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 193, 651–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wimsatt, W. C. (1976). Reductive explanation: a functional account. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Boston studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 671–710). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
- Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar