Skip to main content
Log in

Long-Term Outcomes of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Repair/Reconstruction in Oncological Settings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vocal cord paralysis results from involvement of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), either before the surgery or following excision. Coaptation of the resected edges utilising microsurgical techniques is the most promising therapeutic strategy available for RLN excision. The RLN can be repaired by direct epineural coaptation or using nerve grafts adhering to recommended microsurgical techniques. This article aims to convey our experience with RLN resections/injuries and their subsequent effects. We assessed the RLN repairs that our institute had completed from April 2018 to September 2023(5 years and 5 months) including follow-up of minimum 1 year. The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOSI) was applied to assess dysphagia, aspiration risk, and glottic gap by laryngoscopy, and GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) comprised the basis for the assessment of voice quality by speech specialists. Surgical technique included using 9–0 Ethilon either for primary repair or for repair with a nerve graft. Ten patients were included in the study; six (60%) of them were male with the median age of 32 years. At 12-month follow-up, only 10% (n = 1) was found to have dysphagia. Only 10% (n = 1) had a mild harsh voice. This same patient was the only patient to show a minimal remnant glottic gap. Ten percent (n = 1) patient showed B/l cord mobility at 12 months, while 30% (n = 3) showed flickering movements of the affected vocal cord. In all the patients, the opposite vocal cord was found to be compensating. Thus, immediate repair of RLN is helpful along with the general physiological adaptation of vocal cords to improve phonation and reduce aspiration and dysphagia risks, thus helping to improve the quality of life. The right procedure should choose from the armoury after careful intraoperative assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data can be made availabile by author, if requested.

References

  1. Tsumori T, Nakao K, Miyata M (1985) Clinicopathologic study of thyroid carcinoma infiltrating the trachea. Cancer 56(12):2843–2848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Randolph GW, Dralle H, Abdullah H, Barczynski M, Bellantone R, Brauckhoff M et al (2011) Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: international standards guideline statement. Laryngoscope 121(Supplement 1):S1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Netter FH (2019) Atlas of human anatomy, 7th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jeannon J-P, Orabi AA, Bruch GA, Abdalsalam HA, Simo R (2009) Diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after thyroidectomy: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract 63(04):624–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Masuoka H, Miyauchi A (2022) Intraoperative management of the recurrent laryngeal nerve transected or invaded by thyroid cancer. Front Endocrinol 13:884866. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.884866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Simó R, Nixon IJ, Rovira A et al (2021) Immediate intraoperative repair of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery. Laryngoscope 131(06):1429–1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou F-F, Su C-Y, Jeng S-F, Hsu K-L, Lu K-Y (2003) Neurorrhaphy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. J Am Coll Surg 197(01):52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gurrado A, Pasculli A, Pezzolla A et al (2018) A method to repair the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroidectomy. Can J Surg 61(04):278–282

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong JW, Roh TS, Yoo H-S et al (2014) Outcome with immediate direct anastomosis of recurrent laryngeal nerves injured during thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope 124(06):1402–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ward GM, Sauder C, Olson GT, Nuara MJ (2015) Longitudinal voice outcomes following laryngeal reinnervation via vagus-to-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis after vagal nerve sacrifice: a case series. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 124(02):153–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyauchi A, Ishikawa H, Matsusaka K et al (1993) Treatment of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis by several types of nerve suture [in Japanese]. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 94(06):550–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horsely JA (1909) Suture of recurrent laryngeal nerve with report of a case trans. South Surg Gynecol Assoc 22:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ezaki H, Ushio H, Harada Y, Takeichi N (1982) Recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis following thyroid surgery. World J Surg 6:342–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01653553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faaborg-Andersen K, Vennard W (1964) Electromyography of extrinsic laryngeal muscles during phonation of different vowels. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 73:248–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng H, Li Z, Zhou S (1995) Electromyographic study of human extrinsic laryngeal muscles. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 30:108–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DeLozier KR, Gould FDH, Ohlemacher J, Thexton AJ, German RZ (2018) Impact of recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion on oropharyngeal muscle activity and sensorimotor integration in an infant pig model. J Appl Physiol (1985) 125(1):159–166. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00963.2017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Vinay Kant Shankhdhar, Dushyant Jaiswal, Kunal Mokhale, Saumya Mathews, Mayur Mantri, Vineet Kumar, and Ameya Bindu performed the surgeries. Vineet Kumar and Mayank Mandavgane had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Mayank Mandavgane and Vineet Kumar wrote the manuscript. Kunal Mokhale and Ameya Bindu reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vineet Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study was done in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki protocol. Proper pre-procedure consents were taken for surgery, documentation, and research purposes. Data storage was performed inconsistence with good clinical practice guidelines.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandavgane, M., Kumar, V., Mokhale, K. et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Repair/Reconstruction in Oncological Settings. Indian J Surg Oncol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-01932-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-01932-y

Keywords

Navigation