Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Invasive Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma: an Uncommon and Underreported Variant in Cystectomy Specimens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional urothelial carcinoma is the most common histological type of urinary bladder carcinoma. The latest edition of the WHO classification of tumours of the urothelial tract lays special emphasis on the ability of urothelial tumours to exhibit divergent differentiation with multiple histologic variants and a diverse genomic landscape. The presence of a micropapillary component (MPC) in urothelial carcinoma is associated with high-grade disease and poor response to intravesical chemotherapy. The present study aims to enumerate the clinicohistological features of urothelial carcinomas with micropapillary differentiation. Slides from 144 radical cystectomy specimens received over 6 years were reviewed independently by two pathologists. A predominant histological pattern along with co-existing pathology was noted. Of these, five cases were pure micropapillary carcinomas, four had conventional urothelial carcinoma with a MPC, one had a microscopic tumour at the mucosal surface, and two cases showed micropapillary histology in the lymph node metastasis, following transurethral resection of bladder tumour and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy. The tumours with pure micropapillary carcinoma presented with a higher pathological stage and poor overall survival. Organ and lymph node metastasis was noted in five and eight cases, respectively, of which six showed a micropapillary pattern in the lymph nodes. Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma is a rare and aggressive variant of urothelial carcinoma with unique histologic features. This variant is often missed and underreported in biopsy and surgical resection specimens. Since the presence of MPC confers a poorer prognosis, the identification and reporting of this entity are important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Humphrey PA, Moch H, Cubilla AL, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE (2016) The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part B: prostate and bladder tumours. Eur Urol 70(1):106–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsu J, Ro J (2019) Micropapillary carcinoma of the bladder: recent advances. Annals Urologic Oncol 7:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amin MB, Ro JY, el-Sharkawy T, Lee KM, Troncoso P, Silva EG, Ordóñez NG, Ayala AG (1994) Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder Histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 18(12):1224–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Samaratunga H, Khoo K (2004) Micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder; a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Histopathology 45(1):55–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamat AM, Dinney CP, Gee JR, Grossman HB, Siefker-Radtke AO, Tamboli P, Detry MA, Robinson TL, Pisters LL (2007) Micropapillary bladder cancer: a review of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with 100 consecutive patients. Cancer 110(1):62–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meeks JJ, Taylor JM, Matsushita K, Herr HW, Donat SM, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G (2013) Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive micropapillary bladder cancer. BJU Int 111(8):E325-30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sui W, Matulay JT, James MB, Onyeji IC, Theofanides MC, RoyChoudhury A, DeCastro GJ, Wenske S (2016) Micropapillary bladder cancer: insights from the National Cancer Database. Bladder Cancer 2(4):415–423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng YT, Luo HL, Sung MT, Chiang PH (2010) Micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma: a report of 4 cases and literature review. Chang Gung Med J 33(4):461–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perepletchikov AM, Parwani AV (2009) Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma: clinico-pathologic review. Pathol Res Pract 205(12):807–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Blanca A, Cheng L (2010) Invasive micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Hum Pathol 41(8):1159–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kwon GY, Ro JY (2011) Micropapillary variant of urothelial carcinoma. Adv Urol 2011:217153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Compérat E, Roupret M, Yaxley J, Reynolds J, Varinot J, Ouzaïd I, Cussenot O, Samaratunga H (2010) Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathological analysis of 72 cases. Pathology 42(7):650–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Monn M, Cheng L (2016) Evolving concepts of micropapillary variant urothelial carcinoma. Transl Cancer Res 5(S7):S1539–S1542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hui Y, Lombardo KA, Quddus MR, Matoso A (2018) Cell polarity reversal distinguishes true micropapillary growth from retraction artifact in invasive urothelial carcinoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 26(1):e1–e6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sangoi AR, Higgins JP, Rouse RV, Schneider AG, McKenney JK (2009) Immunohistochemical comparison of MUC1, CA125, and Her2Neu in invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the urinary tract and typical invasive urothelial carcinoma with retraction artifact. Mod Pathol 22(5):660–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chatterjee D, Das A, Radotra BD (2015) Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of urinary bladder: a clinicopathological study. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 58(1):2–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Pallavi Prasad: conceptualisation, methodology, software, reviewing, and editing. Harshita Baranwal: Data curation and writing—original draft preparation. Vinita Agrawal: supervision, reviewing, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pallavi Prasad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasad, P., Baranwal, H. & Agrawal, V. Invasive Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma: an Uncommon and Underreported Variant in Cystectomy Specimens. Indian J Surg Oncol 14, 222–227 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01692-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-022-01692-7

Keywords

Navigation